Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Download MP3
US special envoy George Mitchell will be in Syria soon. Anchor Katy Clark speaks with Syria expert, Joshua Landis, about the prospects for change in the Middle East. Landis is assistant professor of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Oklahoma.
Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.
KATY CLARK: I’m Katy Clark and this is The World. One of the buzzwords from President Obama’s campaign was “change”. And there’s some hope that change could be on the horizon in the Middle East. The President’s special Mid-East envoy, George Mitchell, is on his way to Syria. It will be his second visit in as many months. For years, Syria has been an implacable enemy of Israel, an ally of Iran, and a sponsor of militant groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon. The question is whether Mitchell is able to coax a change out of Damascus. Joshua Landis is a leading blogger on Syria, and is associate professor of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Joshua Landis, I’d like your thoughts on why Mitchell is going back to Damascus?
JOSHUA LANDIS: Well, Obama’s strategic plan for the Middle East and his attempts to get the Middle East peace process moving are in danger of stalling. It’s a little bit like his health plan, in a sense. And so I think this is an attempt to get the ball rolling.
CLARK: So how do you move forward there? I’m wondering if you think that Syria really does want to cooperate with the United States, if it can just get past the fears?
LANDIS: I think Syria does. You know, I just got off the phone with some people at the Syrian embassy, and they’re very concerned. They say, “We’ve been let down by America a number of times in the past. We want very much to move forward. It’s in our interest. We need good relations with America. We want Golan Heights back, and we want peace with Israel. But we don’t want to be roles.” And they put it almost entirely in those words. We want to make sure that this is going to be comprehensive, and developing that trust is difficult. It’s important that Mitchell go continue this dialogue.
CLARK: Do you think that something might come out of this, or these are just the small steps that must be made in democracy and mean nothing out of this particular trip that is building on a greater program?
LANDIS: Well, I think that things can come out of this, that right now the first step is the Iraq intelligence share. America wants to establish a regime where Syria will be arresting people on the Syria side of the border, that Americans will be giving intelligence to Syrian people, and the Syrians will go off and arrest them. And Syrians will be happy to do this, but it also wants to be called an Ambassador and not to be called a territory state and so forth, and it’s moving ahead and working on all these things. So that’s the first step. Then of course there has to be movement on the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Golan Heights. And there we have a real problem, because Prime Minister Netanyahu says Israel is not going to give back the Golan Heights. Syria says, “We need the Golan Heights.” And so much of the problems between America and Syria hinge on this issue, because Syria – as you said in your opening – supports radical groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, that America doesn’t like Israel as much. But Syria supports them because they put pressure on Israel that Syria needs in order to get back the Golan. And Syria’s not going to stop supporting those groups unless it has peace with Israel and gets back its land. So American can go around this issue 100 different ways and patch up relations with Syria, but it will never have decent relations with Syria so long as Golan Heights is occupied by Israel. And that’s the end goal that we really need to get to, and that Mitchell needs to get to. And that’s going to be a very difficult goal.
CLARK: Joshua Lands is director of Middle East studies at the University of Oklahoma. Thank you.
LANDIS: My pleasure.
Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.
I can’t believe you would rely on Elliot Abrams as a source for anything. His claim that the issue of the West Bank settlements was about denying Jews a place to live was a disgusting distortion–it’s about denying Palestinians a place to live. They continue to be driven from the homes and their land and its resources have been stolen. And Abrams is a proven liar, in the thick of the Iran Contra scandal.
Its unfortunate that “The World,” has decided to host Joshua Landis. Among the DC policy world he is known as a regime hack and a mouthpiece for the Syrian foreign ministry. He has indefatigably defended the regime’s support for terror groups and its occupation of Lebanon. While he is certainly entitled to his views, listeners of “The World,” without being informed of his bias, might conclude that these views are the result of scholarly examination.
The interview above makes clear that he wishes to air the views of the embassy of Syria rather than remove himself, as scholars typically do, from the subject at hand. Perhaps his ability, and inclination, to see things from the regime’s perspective is understandable given the amount of time that he has spent in the country. Landis announces on his blog, his yearly trips with his son to his wife’s village in Syria. Landis makes a great representative for the embassy of Syria; but he should not be portrayed as an impartial analyst.