Latest Editions

Honduras standoff

Play

Honduras’ interim president said talks may begin Saturday to address the political crisis enveloping the country since the military deposed the country’s sitting president two weeks ago. Anchor Jeb Sharp gets the latest from Jennifer McCoy, director of the Americas Program at the Carter Center in Atlanta. Listen

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

JEB SHARP: No more curfew this week in Honduras. The country’s interim government lifted the restriction last night for the first time in two weeks. But the standoff continues over the status of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya. Zelaya was removed from office and thrown out of the country by the army. Critics say he was planning an illegal referendum to amend the constitution to allow himself to run for a second term as president. Zelaya, who was democratically elected, had six months left in his first term. Jennifer McCoy directs the Americas Program at the Carter Center in Atlanta, Georgia. Professor McCoy, give us a little perspective. Why is the issue of being President for more than one term such a loaded one there in Honduras, and indeed, in Latin America?

JENNIFER MCCOY: Well, after Honduras went through a period of dictatorship, and returned to democracy in 1980, they wrote a new constitution to prohibit re-election in order to avoid the recurrence of presidents saying in power through illegal means, and turning into a new dictator. They were really trying to avoid the repeat of the historical legacy of much of Latin America having long-term strong men in office, who sometimes stayed in office through manipulated elections in the 19th and 20th centuries.

JEB SHARP: So even though this situation in Honduras is being seen as a kind of illegal coup, is your reading of the current situation that the motivation for removing Zelaya was a real fear that democracy would be endangered if he stayed in office?

JENNIFER MCCOY: Well, there was an added element in terms of the fear, in this particular case, and that was that president Zelaya had been growing increasingly closer to Venezuela. And so there were some important sectors in Honduras who feared that alliance with Venezuela, that he would intend to bring Honduras to a more leftist and anti-US policy. So that was an added component to, I think, this gear about his intentions. And the assumption was, that he would be asking for re-election. But, we’re seeing a growing trend across the board in Latin America, to change those single terms, and begin to allow for re-election. And this is the majority of the countries today, that now have this prevision.

JEB SHARP: And can you take us further back, and give us a sense of the history of term limits? I mean, when did they start being established in the first place, and where and why?

JENNIFER MCCOY: Yes. Most of the countries, as they were implementing democracy throughout the 20th century, did put in single term limits, again, to counter that historical past, especially from the 19th century at the strong men dictators. But, by the 1990′s, there was a desire, in certain cases, particularly Brazil and Argentina, I think, of those new democratic president to have a longer chance to implement the reforms, especially the economic reforms, that they were trying to carry out. And they actually started the trend toward changing the constitution to allow for re-election for at least one additional term.

JEB SHARP: Jennifer McCoy is a professor of political science at George Estate University, thanks so much.

JENNIFER MCCOY: Thank you.

Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

2 comments for “Honduras standoff”

  • Art Kubick

    I have been disappointed in The World’s coverage of the coup in Honduras—but especially by Jeb Sharp’s interview with Jennifer McCoy from the Carter Center on Monday, July 13. It seems that The World has decided to go along with the superficial coverage found in most of the main-stream media by focusing on the story that President Zelaya was trying to change the Honduran Constitution to allow him to serve a second term. Jeb Sharp focused her entire set of questions around this—and to my surprise Dr. McCoy went along with this line of questioning, rather than challenging it.

    The issues behind this coup run much deeper than a simple question of term limits. (In fact, Zelaya was not even running for a second term; nor would he have been able to even if the constitutional convention took place.) There has been a developing grassroots movement in Honduras seeking greater participation by the people in the political process in Honduras. This was really what the movement to change the constitution was all about. As things stand now, the small minority controlling the wealth in the country have all the power—and want to keep it that way; hence the military coup against a democratically elected president whom they perceived as moving to the “left.”

    There have been a number of very good analyses of the Honduran coup written in the weeks since that June 28th coup. It seems that The World has ignored all of them and gone with the simplistic media analysis. Listeners demand much more from your program. Hopefully you will do a bit more research for any future coverage of the situation in Honduras. I will suggest just one commentary among many: Professor Stephen Zunes in Foreign Policy in Focus, “Showdown in‘Tegucigolpe’” (http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/6250).

    Thank you for your consideration.

  • Paul

    Thank you Art Kubick for your post informing us of the issues. Until now I too thought that the whole issue centered around Zelaya wanting to be re-elected. Now I know better. Thanks for the links.