Latest Editions

Britain’s health care system

Play

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download MP3
The World’s Laura Lynch reports on Britain’s National Health Service, which is often dragged into the US debate over health care reform. Critics in the United States call the system inefficient, but many Britons defend the NHS.

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

LISA MULLINS: I’m Lisa Mullins and this is The World. The contentious healthcare reform debate is the US political story right now. The debate is a noisy one, especially when members of congress hold town meetings on the subject. In a few minutes we’re going to here what a couple of foreign correspondents based here in the US make of all the noise. First though we turn to Britain which is often dragged into the American debate because of the UK’s National Health Service. The NHS is a fully government-run system. By contrast the so-called public option being considered in Washington would exist along side the current employer-based system here. Yet some critics in the United States are suggesting that the NHS is exactly the kind of bureaucratic and inefficient system Americans would get stuck with if healthcare reform passes. Those are fighting words for folks in Britain who champion their National Health Service. The World’s Laura Lynch reports.

LAURA LYNCH: Warning to Americans whatever you do don’t get sick in Britain. At least that’s what recent advertisements from a group opposed to the president’s healthcare reforms seem to suggest.

MAN IN COMMERCIAL: Before Congress rushes to overall healthcare listen to those who already have a government-run healthcare.

WOMAN IN COMMERCIAL: In Britain Katie Brickell: denied the Pap test that could have saved her from cervical cancer. Kate Spall: her mother suffered on a wait list as her renal cancer became terminal. Angela French: cost-cutting keeps her waiting for the medication she needs to stay alive.

MAN IN COMMERCIAL: Hear those tragic stories and more at CP Rights dot org. Tell Congress to listen too.

LYNCH: The Fox news channel recently brought in a real live Brit – Conservative member of the European Parliament Daniel Hannan – to share his long-standing condemnation of the NHS with American viewers.

FOX NEWS INTERVIEWER: The universal right to medicine that is just fantastic in your country. Tell me about how great universal healthcare is.

DANIEL HANNAN: The most striking thing about it is that you are very often just sent to the back of the queue. You turn up with a complaint with an ailment and you’re told okay how about October of next year or whatever it is.

LYNCH: One US newspaper even claimed that famed British physicist Stephen Hawking – severely disabled with motor neuron disease – wouldn’t have a chance in the UK. Well Britain is used to getting kicked around whenever Americans debate healthcare but this time they’re finding new ways to fight back. Hawking quickly made it clear he wouldn’t be alive today if not for Britain’s health service. Many others – thousands and thousands – are sticking up for the NHS via Twitter.

DAN MOSS: What we saw yesterday, around this time yesterday, Twitter users started mentioning the term we love the NHS in the thousands.

LYNCH: Dan Moss helped to start the online campaign.

MOSS: So one Tweet reads, “My neighbor got cancer. Radiotherapy, home visits, nurses, dieticians, physios – three years later still alive and not bankrupt. We love the NHS.” Steven Fry – a popular Twitter user that we all know in this country – said, “Know this Republicans even the most right-wing British politician wouldn’t think of dismantling our health service.” Another says, “We love the NHS because we don’t have to think about whether we can afford life-saving treatment when an emergency happens.”

LYNCH: Dr. Geoffrey Rivett, who’s worked in and studied Britain’s National Health Service for decades admits the NHS isn’t perfect. But he believes it provides a convenient target for those who are resisting all change in the United States.

GEOFFREY RIVETT: Of course America does not need to adopt a British system. Every developed country in the world has universal coverage with the exception of the United States. There are dozens of models – employer contribution, insurance-based, tax-based. The idea that you have got to put out one particular puppet and knock it down is a debating technique. It’s not a rational argument.

LYNCH: Watching all this from London where he’s lived for five years, American health policy researcher, Zack Cooper, has divided loyalties.

ZACK COOPER: So if you asked me if I were fully insured, if I had terrific access to the health system and I got cancer where would I want to be? I’d say America. If I were living in Duluth, Minnesota, if I were unemployed or owned a small business, didn’t have health insurance, got cancer. Where would I want to be? I’d probably say here – here in England.

LYNCH: But in the heat of the debate Cooper believes something important has been lost – a chance for both countries to learn from each other.

COOPER: So we had this opportunity to see different elements of what worked in another system and instead of looking at those we got very, very scared and we’ve actually started pulling back.

LYNCH: But there’s no sign that those waging the battle of ideas are laying down their rhetorical weapons in what some believe is a very unhealthy debate. For The World I’m Laura Lynch in London.


Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

One comment for “Britain’s health care system”

  • Richard Cole

    Your commentary is a bit behind the times.

    The nespaper in question printed a clarification. What they meant was that the average Brit, not a world famous astrophysicist, who developed ALS would get short shrift.

    I also didn’t hear anything in this on-air article comparing survival rates for, say, breast cancer and prostate cancer.

    Also according to that newspaper the NHS employs 1.4 million people. Considering the pyramid effect, that would be at least 10 million if NHS were translated to the U.S.