Latest Editions

Hillary Clinton goes to Africa

Play

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download MP3
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 11-day trip to Africa begins with a focus on Somalia, though she won’t actually be visiting the war-ravaged nation. Anchor Marco Werman speaks with the BBC’s East Africa correspondent Peter Greste in Nairobi.

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

MARCO WERMAN: Bill Clinton’s wife is on the road too. This is day one of Hilary Clinton’s eleven-day trip to Africa. The secretary of state arrived today in Kenya. Ms. Clinton is expected to focus on the state of Kenya’s democracy and lieu of last year’s post-election violence. In a moment we’ll hear about one Kenyan’s efforts to promote peace in his country through art. But first another issue on Clinton’s Kenya agenda – the turmoil in neighboring Somalia. The BBC’s East Africa correspondent Peter Greste is in the Kenyan capital Nairobi. Peter Washington has largely ignored Somalia since it pulled out American combat troops. That was back in 1993. Why is Secretary Clinton focusing on Somalia now? What is she hoping to accomplish?

PETER GRESTE: The problem for the United States and indeed Britain and much of the West is that Somalia is fast moving along the path that Afghanistan moved the last time the United States abandoned that country. And the problem is that we’re seeing resurgence in extremism. We’re seeing a movement called al-Shabaab which loosely translates as the youth and which has been accused of having links to al-Qaeda. And Somalia is essentially the world’s worst failed state. There is no effective government to speak of. Al-Shabaab is laying siege to the capital city and we’re seeing alarming rising reports of terrorism and extremism across that country. Now Somalia is right on Kenya’s border. Islamic extremists were implicated on the bomb blasts against the US Embassy here in Nairobi more than 10 years ago and also in Dar El Salam. So it is a pressing problem and Hilary Clinton will be meeting the Somali president, Sheik Sharif Ahmed, in her visit here to try and figure out a way of helping ease the problem in Somalia and perhaps bring about some stability.

WERMAN: Now as you say Peter Secretary Clinton will meet with Sheik Sharif Ahmed the Somalian president later this week in Kenya. He’s something of a figure head in Somalia. He doesn’t even live in the capital Mogadishu. What kind of clout does Mr. Ahmed have at this point and is he an ally Washington should be counting on?

GRESTE: He’s an interesting character because he was actually a man that Washington dismissed as an Islamic extremist not so long ago. He led a movement called the Islamic Court’s Union. As such the US felt that he was a threat to the regional stability. Now he’s a man who heads the transitional federal government and he has the endorsement of the United Nations. He has enormous amounts of international recognition including the United States. But his problem is that he has very little military clout. The al-Shabaab movement has the military initiative in Somalia at the moment. They have pushed the government into a very tiny corner to the point where as you say it’s not even safe for the president. The government controls Mogadishu and one other small district in central Somalia. So in practical terms and domestically he doesn’t have anywhere near the amount of authority and power that he needs to really bring stability to the country. And I think this is really one of the major dilemmas facing the international community when it comes to dealing with that country.

WERMAN: In the meantime hundreds of thousands of Somali refugees have fled across the border to Kenya and they keep on coming. The UNHCR, the UN refugee agency said that it was actually failing to provide even the most basic amenities for these refugees in one camp, very sprawling, Dadaab Camp. Now you went to that camp today. What did you see Peter?

GRESTE: That’s right it is an absolutely desperate situation. As you’re saying almost 300,000 people in a camp that was designed for just 90,000. The congestion is so extreme out there that there’s simply no more space to put new arrivals. And the effect of this is really quite staggering. The problem is that the infrastructure simply cannot cope with those numbers. The authorities don’t know where everybody is now because of the way that they’re filtering into the camp. And new arrivals are coming in at a rate of more than 6000 a month. So clearly something has to be done and very urgently.

WERMAN: the BBC’s East Africa correspondent Peter Greste in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi. Thanks for the update Peter.

GRESTE: Pleasure.


Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

2 comments for “Hillary Clinton goes to Africa”

  • Holly King

    First let me say Marco, I am a fan! As I was on my way to work I was astounded by the introduction to the Hillary Clinton goes to Africa story. I understand that the first line was meant to be a transition between stories but even this movement from one idea to another can generate perhaps unwanted, perceptions. What struck me most was the immediate reference to Secretary of state Hillary Clinton as “Bill Clinton’s Wife. I thought to myself, “even OPB cannot be trusted to report about this accomplished person without referencing her gender! To check my perception, when I got to my office I listened carefully to the wording. The story starts, “Bill Clinton’s Wife is on the road too, this is day one of Hillary Clinton’s 11 day trip to Africa. The Secretary of state arrives today in Kenya. Ms Clinton is expected to….” I am not an expert on grammar so I imagine that there could be a better analysis here, but the way I heard this and the way I read this too there seems to be a terrible struggle connecting Hillary Clinton to her role as a leader.
    1. The first phrase assigns her to the role of Wife.
    2. The second indicates she is merely a traveler.
    3. By the third phrase fails to attach the role Secretary of state to the person Hillary Clinton.
    4. Finally the reference to Hillary Clinton as “MS” awkwardly drives at separating her from previously assigned wife role, but by following that with “Is expected to…” keeps her passive.
    How hard would it be to simply leave out the verbal reference to her husband and just introduce, the story with , “ Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State is going to Africa to ease tensions there” Or something like that?
    What if we were talking about Bill?
    Hillary Clinton’s husband is on the road too, this is day 2 of Bill Clinton’s trip to North Korea. The former president arrives today in Piang yen (SP?). Mr. Clinton is expected to….
    Actually, I listened to both stories over again and found that in the story about Bill he is reported as having made accomplishments and important headway in the relations between the two countries even though he is not on official state business. Juxtapose the story about Hillary and you will see her role and accomplishments are relatively vague even though she is there on state business.
    I imagine that the use of language here is not intended to reinforce the dominance of patriarchy in our society; I just ask that you think consider the ways it might. As a Speech Communication and women’s studies instructor I am probably more sensitive to this stuff than others, but I can’t help wondering when our language use will catch up with our ideology of equality between men and women? I would be happy to receive feedback from you on my thoughts here. Thank you for The World. I will keep listening.

  • A Friedman

    I second Holly King’s comment.

    Secretary of State Clinton has earned her position and deserves to be addressed by her own accomplishments before any other affiliations are mentioned.