Background   BBC   Books   Cartoons   Economy   Environment   Health   History   Language   Religion   Science   Special Reports   Technology   Travel

Latest Editions

Dealing with Pakistan’s insurgency

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download MP3
Four recent militant attacks in Pakistan – including one over the weekend against the Army headquarters in Islamabad – raise questions about how Pakistan is cracking down on militant groups. The World’s Matthew Bell reports.

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

MARCO WERMAN:  The latest attacks in Pakistan are raising serious concerns about the security situation there, as The World’s Matthew Bell reports.

MATTHEW BELL:  Pakistan’s Army is the most powerful institution in the country, which makes this weekend’s braising attack on army headquarters outside the capital Islamabad all the more worrisome. South Asia expert, Christine Fair of Georgetown University says, the cracks of the problem is that Pakistan’s military has only declared a partial war on terrorism. That’s to say the army has decided to fight some elements of the Pakistani Taliban.

CHRISTINE FAIR:  But it has not declared a war on terrorism against a variety of other organizations, that operate collusively with the Pakistan Taliban because those organizations are asset to the state. And I’m specifically talking about the [INDISCERNIBLE] on Taliban, and I’m specifically talking about groups that focus their efforts and energies against India.

MATTHEW BELL:  First, take the Afghan Taliban, for example. This is the group allied with Al Qaeda that the US-led invasion of Afghanistan toppled back in 2001. The Afghan Taliban leader, Mullah Omar is now thought to be in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province. The American ambassador to Pakistan recently suggested that if the Pakistani military doesn’t get rid of Mullah Omar, then the US would do so. That was seen as a threat to begin American drone attacks in Baluchistan. Pakistan’s Army chief responded by saying that would not be allowed. Christine Fair says the episode is instructive.

CHRISTINE FAIR:  The Afghan Taliban continue to enjoy sanctuary in Pakistan, period, end of story.

MATTHEW BELL:  As for the other extremist groups in Pakistan, many of them have been historically focused on India, and they’ve received support from Pakistan’s intelligence service. Fair says Pakistan’s military is still reluctant to move against them as well.

CHRISTINE FAIR: And that’s the realization that Pakistan has not yet come to. And until it does, it is gonna deal with an increasingly vicious internal security problem.

MATTHEW BELL:  Pakistan’s foreign minister paints a very different picture. Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations last week, and he said Pakistan does not distinguish between good terrorists and bad ones. Qureshi said Pakistan’s military is cracking down on militant groups in the country.

MAKHDOOM SHAH MAHMOOD QUERESHI: Because we want to clear our territory of all kind of mischief. These people have caused us more harm than anybody else.

MATTHEW BELL:  A new US aid package is already having political implications. Congress just approved an additional seven and a half billion dollars in military and economic assistance for Pakistan. The money would be delivered over the next five years. but only if certain conditions are met, including a demand to crack down on terrorist groups. Some of those conditions are proving to be controversial in Pakistan however. The head of the Army has reportedly raised objections. And the political opposition is portraying the conditions as an American infringement on Pakistan’s sovereignty. The foreign minister appeared to have the diplomatic standoff in mind last week when he said the US and Pakistan should learn to trust each other more. For The World, I’m Matthew Bell.


Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

See also

Discussion

No comments for “Dealing with Pakistan’s insurgency”

Post a comment

Support The World

PRI's The World on Facebook