Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Download MP3
Emotions have been running high in Jerusalem over the al-Aqsa mosque, Islam’s third holiest site, which sits on the Haram al-Sharif or Temple Mount, next to the Jewish Western Wall, in Jerusalem’s heavily contested walled Old City. After several weekends of riots by Palestinians on the Al Aqsa compound, Israeli police sealed off the West Bank and limited Muslim prayer at the mosque. The rebuilding of a destroyed synagogue in Jerusalem’s old city this week prompted rumors among Palestinians that it’s just the first step in Jewish efforts to build a temple where the Al Aqsa mosque stands, and where Jewish tradition holds that the Biblical temples stood. Police are on high alert for more rioting. The Noble Sanctuary or Temple Mount compound is a minefield in the Israeli Palestinian conflict. And as Daniel Estrin reports from Jerusalem, the archaeology of the area can be just as explosive.
Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.
JEB SHARP: Israel’s diplomatic feud with the U.S. has overshadowed its longer lasting dispute with the Palestinians over Jerusalem’s holiest shrine. That dispute erupted again this week when Palestinian leaders called on their constituents to protect Al Aqsa Mosque. Israel had imposed tight restrictions on Palestinian access to the mosque. But today those restrictions were lifted. Still, Al-Aqsa remains an archaeological flash point in Jerusalem. Daniel Estrin reports on some digs there that are pitting Israeli archaeologists against not only Palestinians, but each other.
DANIEL ESTRIN: If there’s one stereotype that archaeologists like Eilat Mazar try to shake off; it’s the Indiana Jones image of digging up treasures of Biblical proportions. But Mazar’s latest find comes pretty close. A few weeks ago this third generation Israeli archaeologist announced that she had uncovered a massive fortification wall, and she’s convinced that it was built by none other than King Solomon.
EILAT MAZAR: I mean, it fits the Biblical story that King Solomon built the fortification line, the wall of Jerusalem, as it says very clearly. Up until now, this is the only construction that we can come as close as possible to King Solomon’s reign.
ESTRIN: The find, of course, created a buzz among archaeologists. But in Jerusalem, stones also carry political weight. Israeli leaders refer to the city as the eternal capital of the Jewish people. Palestinians see the city as the Capital of their future state. This is Abir Zayyad, a Palestinian tour guide with a master’s in archaeology from Al Quds University in Jerusalem speaking on Palestinian TV a few months ago. David and Solomon don’t appear in historical records of the ancient Near East other than the Bible, and no remains of Solomon’s temple has been found. That’s what makes Zayyad and other Palestinian academics dubious about the Biblical account. It’s not that Zayyad thinks David and Solomon are made up, but she doesn’t believe they were ever in Jerusalem.
ZAYYAD: There is not any kind of archaeological evidence. They dig and dig and dig and there is nothing. From a lot of people point of view, even if David or Solomon was here, they don’t have the right to occupy us.
ESTRIN: After the Israeli watchdog group Palestinian Media Watch publicized her TV appearance, officials fired Zayyad from her job at a Jerusalem city history museum and yanked her Israeli tour guiding license. But Jerusalem archaeology doesn’t just divide Israelis and Palestinians. Even Israeli archaeologists butt heads when it comes to the history of the first Biblical kings. Archaeologist Israel Finkelstein is one of the country’s most vocal critics of Eilat Mazar’s findings.
ISRAEL FINKELSTEIN: She reads the Biblical text as if she reads the New York Times or so. The whole attitude to the Biblical text is wrong here.
ESTRIN: Finkelstein doesn’t doubt that David established a dynasty in ancient Jerusalem, but he thinks it was a small village, not the capital of a large empire, which is what the Bible states and what Mazar thinks. Jerusalem is probably the most excavated city in the world. But there’s one place that’s off limits for archaeologists. Muslims call it the noble sanctuary, where tradition says Muhammad ascended to heaven in his night journey. According to Jewish tradition, it’s the Temple Mount, the place where King Solomon built the first temple and King Harrod built the second. Late Palestinian Yasser Arafat said that no Jewish temple ever stood there. Excavations could set the record straight, but the Islamic authorities that govern the area forbid digging there. So one Israeli archaeologist set out to do what he considers the next best thing.
GABRIEL BARKAY: The soil goes automatically through this device into four buckets. The four buckets are then taken and soaked with water.
ESTRIN: For the last five years, Gabriel Barkay has been sifting through piles and piles of dirt that was unearthed from the compound to build the subterranean mosque. The rubble was dumped in a nearby valley. Barkay says he’s uncovered tens of thousands of finds.
BARKAY: If you look at it carefully, you can see that it is a baked sealing, which was attached once to a written document.
ESTRIN: One seal Barkay found features the Hebrew inscription “son of Imer”. The Bible mentions that a member of the Imer family was in charge of worship at the temple in Jerusalem.
BARKAY: And so we have direct regards from Solomon’s temple in our finds.
ESTRIN: The sifting project costs a million dollars a year, mostly bankrolled by the City of David foundation, a controversial organization that settles Jews in Palestinian neighborhoods of Jerusalem. The foundation has also funded Eilat Mazar’s digs. Critics say these Israeli archaeological activities are similar to building houses in East Jerusalem. But both Barkay and Mazar say they’re doing independent scientific work. And they’re proud of it. For The World, I’m Daniel Estrin in Jerusalem.
Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.
Discussion
2 comments for “Jerusalem’s controversial archaeology”