Homepage Feature

The Arab view of US-Israeli relations

Play
Download

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download MP3
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has dismissed the idea that US-Israeli relations are in crisis amid a quarrel over Jewish settlers in East Jerusalem. The spat has certainly been getting a lot of attention in both the US and Israel. But what’s been the reaction in the Arab world? The World’s Jason Margolis has more.

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

JEB SHARP:  The current quarrel between the U.S. and Israel is of great interest to Arab news consumers too.  The World’s Jason Margolis has more on what they are reading and hearing.

JASON MARGOLIS:  Professor Makram Khoury-Machool studies the Arab media.  He teaches at the British Universities of Cambridge and Hartfordshire.  Khoury-Machool has been following the coverage of the U.S.-Israel spat within the Arab media.  He says angry reaction about Israel’s settlement building, not really that surprising.  But Khoury-Machool says the Arab world isn’t especially focused on Israeli actions right now.

MAKRAM KHOURY-MACHOOL:  The change this time, I mean the Arab media was very much concerned this time, whether the American administration is going to change it’s foreign policy towards Israel.  This was the main focus rather than whether the Arab world is angry with Israel’s actions.  The Arab world is angry with Israel’s actions anyway.

MARGOLIS: Khoury-Machool says Arab columnists are split between those who believe the Obama Administration really wants Israel to free settlements, and those who believe the Obama administration is just paying lip service to curry favor in the Arab world.  To understand this schism with how Arabs are feeling about the Obama administration, you have to rewind nine months to Cairo.  That’s when President Obama delivered this speech to the Arab world.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:  The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.  This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace.  It is time for these settlements to stop.

MARGOLIS: President Obama’s speech resonated hugely within the Muslim world.  Michele Dunne, with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said the President didn’t break much ground with new policies.  But she says Mr. Obama’s speech showed a remarkable sensitivity towards Muslims.

MICHELE DUNNE:  In quoting the Koran and the raising things from Muslim history and civilization and so forth and showing that he had respect for those things that was what was remarkable for it.

MARGOLIS: But now, nine months later – -

DUNNE:  There is a lot of disappointment across the Muslim world with what Obama said he would do and what has actually happened.

MARGOLIS: That leads some to suggest there really isn’t that much disagreement in the Arab world.  That the relationship between the Israel and the U.S. comes first, and Arab interests are an afterthought.  Rami Khouri is a syndicated columnist based in Beirut.

RAMI KHOURI:   Generally, people are saying well, don’t be fooled.  The Americans are criticizing the Israelis now, and Clinton is saying this and Obama is saying this, but in a few weeks the AIPAC is holding it’s convention, the major Israeli lobby in the U.S.  The AIPAC convention will bring things back to normal.

MARGOLIS: But while many Arabs expected dispute over new Israeli settlements to end in disappointment for them, Steve Crane of the Brookings Institution sees a positive side.  He argues that the current U.S.- Israeli dispute may actually help improve relations between President Obama and those in the Arab world.

STEVE CRANE:  He’s re-engaging on an issue that’s important to them. He’s re-engaging on this issue of settlements which in many respects is symbolic for them of a greater American commitment to resolve, finally, this conflict.

MARGOLIS: But President Obama has to do more than just re-engage in the Palestinian – Israeli conflict, he has to win the current argument over settlements, says Carnegie’s Michele Dunne.

DUNNE:  If once again the Obama administration sort of backs down and accepts far less than these demands that we’ve now heard that Secretary of State Clinton has made of Prime Minister Netanyahu, then again it will look as though Obama takes no for an answer.

MARGOLIS: The Obama administration may have to take no for an answer.  Despite attempts on both sides to minimize the diplomatic dispute, Israel says it stands behind its long held policy of building in East Jerusalem.  For The World, I’m Jason Margolis.


Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

3 comments for “The Arab view of US-Israeli relations”

  • Doron

    The World and broader media have ignored every act of Palestinian incitement:

    (1) The renaming of a square after the notorious Dalal Mugrabi (who killed 37 Israeli civilians) originally scheduled for last Thursday. It was done a little later to avoid VP Biden’s visit.

    (2) The Hamas and PA call for violence over rededication of the Herva synagogue that caused all the violence this week. The Herva synagogue was blown up together with dozens of others by the Jordanians in 1948.

    But then – every issue is reported through Palestinian eyes.

  • Randy

    I was disturbed by The World’s assertion in their Thursday report on Israeli-US relations. The assertion that the coalitional aspect of Israel’s current government means the Prime Minister lacks room to move on the East Jerusalem issue, without qualification, was uncalled for. The report from the previous news program on NPR explained how Likud’s coalition partners all have a reputation of not putting land at the top of their priorities. It is in fact Likud, Netenyahu’s own party that has the strongest commitment to not surrendering any land ever for any reason.

    Sincrely,
    Randy Gabrielse

  • John Dalton

    Could Israel create an artificial peninsula as Dubai and the Netherlands have in lieu of settling in disputed territories? Most people would rather live near the coast than in hostile territory. Thank you & all the best, John / Kansas City, MO