Homepage Feature

Voices from Jerusalem

Play
Download

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

It’s been a busy week for Mideast diplomats. The US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Middle East envoy George Mitchell met with Israeli and Palestinians leaders numerous times over several days. The World’s Matthew Bell has been gauging public opinion on both sides of the divide. Friday he visited the Mehane Yehuda market in downtown Jerusalem and brings us these voices. (Photo: Daniel Estrin)
Download MP3


More reports and additional context from Matthew Bell

Read the Transcript
This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

MARCO WERMAN: I’m Marco Werman. This is The World. It’s been a busy week for Mideast diplomats. The latest round of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks did not produce a breakthrough. In fact, it produced a walk-out threat from the Palestinians over the issue of Israeli settlement construction. The World’s Matthew Bell has been gauging public opinion on both sides of the divide. Today he visited the Mehane Yehuda market in downtown Jerusalem and sent us these voices.

ALONA:  My name is Alona.

MATTHEW BELL:  When you see pictures of Hillary Clinton meeting with Abbas, Netanyahu, do you feel?

ALONA: Nothing. Because I don’t know if Abbas is the right leader that we need to negotiate with. Because he is not the main enemy for us. The main enemy, for example, is the Hamas. If we’ll do a peace with him, it won’t help us because the main enemy will stay and they don’t want peace with us.

RON BELOVSKY: My name is Ron Belovsky, I’m from Toronto and I live here in Har Hohma, which is one of the disputed areas according to America, but obviously not disputed according to us. You know, I’m sorry. Let’s see the Palestinians start to cooperate with something that we’re trying to do and then something happening. There’s actually an old adage that says, if the Palestinians put down their guns, there will be peace. If the Israelis put down their guns, there won’t be an Israel. That’s what it comes down to.

SPEAKING HEBREW

SARIT: I really hope that the talks succeed but I think that the Israeli public is tired of it. Every time we see this, it repeats itself and the talks blow up in our face. I don’t think the public’s interested any more.

DEBORAH: My name is Deborah. I think that maybe it’s a start to find a way to the solution of this problem of coexistence. Maybe it’s a beginning of something.

GABRIEL: Well, my name is Gabriel. I think that, as my sister said, it’s a very good beginning. But we don’t have to forget that this is the land of the Jewish people. I think that we have to be with our eyes open.

NATANEL: My names in Natanel. I’m 27 years old. I think that the peace come from the people, both people, not from the leaders. If we have a business together and if we sit and eat together and drink coffee together and we have relationship, kind of relationship. So this is peace, but not from the leader and all this paper, because [INDISCERNIBLE] and for the Nobel prize. But it’s bulls**t.

PAUL VESSELEY:  My name is Paul Vesseley. And I believe that Netanyahu has already come to the table. I believe it shows that he’s actually very serious about making peace. And I think it’s now time for the Palestinian leadership to show they’re serious about the talks. And they need to come to the table with some serious statements of speaking of a two state solution for two peoples as well which is very important.

WERMAN: Israeli voices from the Mehane Yehuda market in Jerusalem. You can see and hear more from the market in an audio slideshow. You can find it at TheWorld.org.


Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

8 comments for “Voices from Jerusalem”

  • Kenneth Jopp

    Why do we hear only Israeli opinions? Aren’t the
    Palestinians most affected by the “peace talks”
    Are you anti-Arab? Go to the West Bank and Gaza
    and get another view please.

  • Buccaneer

    Yet another Matthew Bell only Israel matters report. Marco Werman introduces the piece as voices from both sides, and not a single voice from Palestine, only Israel. Bell has lost even the minimal credibility he may have had. Get a new reporter.

    • http://www.theworld.org The World

      Please see our additional reports from Matthew Bell cited in this post and in the above comments.

      Thanks,
      The World

  • Dorn

    Isn’t it strange how when a rare Israeli voice is heard, some commenters throw a tantrum.

    How long will it take for the World to balance its overwhelming pro-Palestinian bias?

    This biggest bias is in the issues it chooses to ignore.
    How long will it take AP to mention legitimate Israeli concerns:

    (1) Security.
    Israel’s Gaza withdrawal led to 10 000 rockets launched into Israel. Israel has a legitimate fear that the same would happen from the West Bank – but worse, as most Israelis live in the country’s center. Moreover, Israel (the size of New Jersey) has been repeatedly attacked by far larger neighbors in the past 62 years.

    (2) Incitement.
    This includes PA TV childrens’ programs that call all of pre-1967 Israel occupied; The naming of youth camps, town squares, computer centers after Dalal Mugrabi, Amin Al Hindi. Their only claim to fame were the worst terror attacks on Israel. These include the PA’s (racist) death sentence on anyone selling land to Jews.

    (3) The refugee issue.
    Mahmoud Abbas demands that descendants of Arab refugees be resettled in pre-1967 Israel, and not in a future Palestinian state. At the same time, he demands a Judenrein West Bank. Thus he demands a purely Palestinian state in the West Bank along a state with a major Palestinian minority in what is now Israel. In so doing, he denies the rights of the similar number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands; and sidesteps Arab responsibility for starting the wars that led to BOTH refugee issues.

    (4) Arab refusal to compromise.
    Past and present Israeli concessions have not led to reciprocal measures by the Arab world. The Arab boycotts and political attacks on Israel continue. Abbas has stuck to every hardline position of Arafat. Why does this “peace process” amount to one-sided concessions by Israel, followed only by further Arab demands?

    • Buccaneer

      Have you ever even done a basic search of The World’s website? *Rare* Israeli voices? You are out of your mind.

  • Buccaneer

    I have; I’m unimpressed.