Capturing the war in cameras

Play
Download

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Combat men and women carry cameras to document the war (Photos: Jake Warga)

We have seen a lot of pictures from Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade. Chances are that many of them were actually taken by the military. All four branches of the US military train a special force of soldiers that carry not just guns into battle, but also cameras. Combat cameramen and women, document everything from battles to the daily life of the soldiers. Most of the soldiers in training will be deployed either to Afghanistan or Iraq. Correspondent Jake Warga has more.

By Jake Warga
(Excerpt from Jake Warga’s interview with Photojournalism Chief Joseph Kane)

“…real borderline on the exposure here, it’s almost overblown, we still have some detail, but be careful.”

“My name is MCC, that’s Mass Communication specialist Chief Joseph Kane, I’m the photojournalism chief for combat camera Pacific.”

Kane is reviewing images his soldiers brought back from a training mission earlier in the day.

“We missed the exposure, and when you’ve blown details out you’re not going to get them back.”

A major component in current conflicts is the war over information, and combat cameramen are in the front lines. They document battles for the historical archives, every image going into the pentagon’s library

“The bulk of our imagery doesn’t get seen until maybe fifty years when it’s declassified or whatever.”

But they also shoot for field strategy review and press releases. Some photos even end-up on Facebook to keep family and friends back home up to date. The military learned early on the power of the photo, that the camera can be a weapon:

“The Vietnam thing and how a piece of information or some imagery can turn the public sentiment, so it is an information war. I think the leaders understand that now …which is why this unit has so many missions now, that basically every six months we’re turning around, going back out the door.”

“What’s your primary mission? Someone tell me? Your primary mission is to bring back imagery. They only hire us to go out on these jobs because we know how to use a camera not because we’re good at weapons, the weapons just enable us to be there and to integrate.”

(weapons sounds) “Give me a thumbs up, you guys good to go”

But they are good at weapons, very good, and much of their training involves taking turns between weapon proficiency and photographing. In this exercise, soldiers shoot at targets inside a mock village with both their rifles and Nikons, we’re all wearing earplugs. The cardboard image of a gun-pointing terrorist hiding in one room did not survive the mock raid.

“I’ve been deployed to Iraq twice. There are some disturbing images, but I don’t know that I necessarily don’t want to remember them. I can do without some of the bloody gory things that come back, where maybe something happened, I don’t try to recall those very much even though some of them do stick there. Whether it’s our guys or their guys, to see human beings, human bodies is always difficult.

How do I live with the fact that I’m out there taking pictures, and this is what I’m risking my life for essentially, what is the importance of me being there? I think everybody probably agrees that we don’t want, we don’t want war, but… it keeps happening, and as long as it keeps happening it’s important that we have people who are going to document that. There’s certainly no magic button that I have access to that can stop the cycle.”

Download MP3 (Photo: Jake Warga)

Discussion

6 comments for “Capturing the war in cameras”

  • Tom Moffatt

    It would be interesting to know what lenses these photographers used most often. Wide, Tele, Wide-ranging Zoom, Low Light? Their insight would be very enlightening for the rest of us.

    • SSG Stephanie Hatcher

      I’m an Army photojournalist, and I teach photography at the Defense Information School at Fort Meade, Md. We train our students on Nikon D200s, and the standard training kit we issue has 50 and 20mm lenses. Later on we issue them 70-300mm zoom lenses. The standard kit for the fleet/field is a Nikon D80, Nikon D200, and an array of lenses from 35-200mm to 400mm fixed lenses to fisheyes and night-vision. Most shops have a wide variety of lenses, and you take what you think you’ll need for that mission. My personal standard is to always have something a little wider (in the 35-50mm range), plus something a little longer (my personal fave is the 35-70mm Nikor). You sometimes have to sacrifice the number of lenses you’d like to take, because when you’re out on mission, you’re carrying a full combat load (weapon, body armor, plus ammo) as well as all your camera equipment. The Marine Corps uses Canon, but the other 4 services use Nikon. Hope this answers your question!

    • http://web.me.com/ablekane/Site/Welcome.html Joe Kane

      Tom,
      We currently use Nikon D3X, D3S, D300 and D700 cameras with a variety of lenses – mostly personal choice and of course whatever the situation dictates.

      We also have military grade night vision lenses that we can use in low light situations.

      Navy Combat Camera has the task of testing and evaluating new camera gear for the rest of the Fleet so we often have slightly better gear all around.

      As SSG Hatcher mentioned above, a good medium-range lens is a great all-purpose lens to start with.

      Cheers!
      MCC Joe Kane

  • http://www.defense.gov/home/features/military_photographers/clare/ Micah Clare

    Here’s to all my fellow photographers who did what they could to make heroes out of our brave men and women in uniform!

  • Gregory Kim

    I’m thinking to join in the U.S ARMY or U.S AIRFORCE, after I got graduate from the university.
    I have only one question.
    Is it possible to utilize my expertise(which is photography) in U.S AIRFORCE? or do I need to join the ARMY?

    • MSG Herrick

      Both Services provide combat documentation. One major difference is that in the Air Force if you are a photographer (3N0X4) you are ONLY a photographer. In the Army, if you are a 25V, you do it all so to speak (video, photo, etc.). Please correct me if I am wrong.