Entire program – December 14, 2010

Play
Download

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Today on The World: The late Richard Holbrooke’s accomplishments in his last job, as special US envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan; Also, Cuba launches its own version of Wikipedia, complete with its own version of historical events; Then a look at how South Africa decides who gets life-saving medical care, the first story in our week-long series on the rationing of health care around the globe. Download MP3

Discussion

2 comments for “Entire program – December 14, 2010”

  • rick rice

    Maybe not snarky fruit at all; see this wikipedia selection: In April 1823 US Secretary of State John Quincy Adams discussed the rules of political gravitation, in a theory often referred to as the “ripe fruit theory”. Adams wrote, “There are laws of political as well as physical gravitation; and if an apple severed by its native tree cannot choose but fall to the ground, Cuba, forcibly disjoined from its own unnatural connection with Spain, and incapable of self-support, can gravitate only towards the North American Union which by the same law of nature, cannot cast her off its bosom.” [28] Adams described Cuba as “incapable” and described its separation from Spain as inevitable. He specified the islands gravitation towards North America rather than Europe. As he explained that, “the transfer of Cuba to Great Britain would be an event unpropitious to the interest of this Union.”[29] Adams voiced concern that a country outside of North America would attempt to occupy Cuba upon its separation from Spain. He wrote, “The question both of our right and our power to prevent it, if necessary, by force, already obtrudes itself upon our councils, and the administration is called upon, in the performance of its duties to the nation, at least to use all the means with the competency to guard against and forefend it.”

  • http://wandervogeldiary.wordpress.com Dan Dailey

    Lisa,

    I respectfully disagree with your use of the word “snarky” in connection with the “Cuban Wiki” story.

    Definition: 1. Rudely sarcastic or disrespectful; snide. 2. Irritable or short-tempered; irascible.

    Isn’t it time we begin LISTENING to what our supposed adversaries are saying about us? Seems to me there’s an element of truth in the Cuban view of the US.

    Seems to me we should listen respectfully and think about what they are telling us, even if we think we do not like them.

    Characterizing an adversary as “snarky” can only shut down communication and mutual understanding.

    You have a role in shaping public receptivity to other voices. You have an unique opportunity to bring other voices forward. Please help us to see all sides of issues so we can decide for ourselves.

    Thank you for listening.

    Dan Dailey