New Law Bans Israelis from Boycotting West Bank Settlements

Danielle Blumenstyk of Peace Now holding the poster/petition calling for people to boycott settlement products. (Photo: Daniel Estrin)

Danielle Blumenstyk of Peace Now holding the poster/petition calling for people to boycott settlement products. (Photo: Daniel Estrin)

by Daniel Estrin

The controversy that’s erupted in Israel over a new law was entirely predictable. The law allows Jewish settlers in the West Bank to sue Israelis who promote boycotts of their products.

The controversy reflects a growing chasm in Israel. On one side are those who support the country’s 44-year-long occupation of the West Bank as an historic Jewish right. On the other are those who view the presence of soldiers and settlers in the Palestinian territory as a national calamity.

The new law says an Israeli can be punished if they boycott an Israeli company or institution that’s in Israel, or in an area under Israel’s control. That last clause –- an area under Israel’s control – is a reference to the Israeli-occupied West Bank. If an Israeli calls for a boycott of products made by settlers, those settlers can sue her.

The law passed at night, and immediately, the Israeli organization Peace Now started a Facebook page. Danielle Blumenstyk is one of 4,000-some Israelis who joined. The first thing they did was to defy the new law.

“We are blatantly saying on our Facebook page,” Blumenstyk said. “We are calling out to a boycott of settlements. Sue us. That’s what it says, black on white.”

Blumenstyk and other activists with Peace Now frantically worked the phones today in their cramped basement office, urging celebrities to support a boycott of products made by Jewish settlers.

The Peace Now logo on their Facebook page. It says "Sue Me: I boycott settlement products"

“This is the petition we are trying to get people to sign today,” Blumenstyk said, holding up a large poster with the word “boycott” in big letters. She hopes Israelis will sign it.

“We’re hoping that this protest will … create a situation in which the law will be revoked,” Blumenstyk said.

Emotions about boycotts run high in Israel. Last year, more than 60 actors and directors from six major Israeli theater companies refused to perform at a theatre in Ariel, a West Bank settlement.

The theatre troupes are government subsidized. But the actors said they couldn’t perform in Ariel in good conscience because they consider Israeli settlements an obstacle to peace. That infuriated Israeli politicians like Danny Danon.

“When we heard about major groups who decided not to perform in Ariel, we decided enough is enough,” said Danon, who co-sponsored the new law.

“You cannot receive funding from the government and decide that you are not performing,” Danon added.” I think that it is part of democracy to put limits. In democracy, when someone is hurting someone else, you have to put limits.”

The other co-sponsor of the law, Zeev Elkin, insists that it’s “not meant to muzzle anyone, but to protect the citizens of Israel” who are settlers.

Parliament member Yohanan Plesner, however, predicts that the law, which seeks to impede boycotts, will only encourage them.

“As a result of this legislation, and as a result of the protest that it will give rise to, they will probably begin all sorts of boycotts,” Plesner said. “So obviously it will backfire because it’s a stupid piece of legislation.”

An Israeli civil rights group says it will challenge the boycott law in Israel’s Supreme Court in the coming days.

Discussion

6 comments for “New Law Bans Israelis from Boycotting West Bank Settlements”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Y6L6FTDBJYFKOHEZCN6BO6ZEGQ dorn

    Estrin omitted the most essential context:
    (1) The West Bank came into Israel’s possession as a result of Arab wars to destroy Israel.

    (2) Repeated Israeli offers to hand over almost all of the West Bank for peace have been rebuffed by the Palestinians and Arab world (in 1967 by the Arab League, in 2001 by Arafat, in 2008 by Abbas).

    (3) Those behind boycotts are not seeking to “end Israel’s occupation” but to deligitimize and destroy Israel. That is the stated purpose of the BDS movement worldwide.

    Nor is there a “chasm” in Israel as claimed by Estrin (except with a very small fringe of Israelis). Repeated opinion polls shows that an overwhelming majority of Israelis (80%+) have been forced to realize there is no peace partner. That same majority would be happy to make major concessions for  peace.

    But they face a Palestinian Authority that
    (a) rejects ever recognizing Israel as a Jewish homeland;
    (b) denies any Jewish connection to Jerusalem;
    (c) names youth camps and town squares after the worst terrorist attackers;
    (d) signed a pact with Hamas;
    (e) is pursuing unilateral statehood without peace;
    (f) shows all of Israel as part of PA territory on all its maps;
    (g) indoctrinates its youth for endless conflict.

     

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kevin-M-Estis/1376179447 Kevin M. Estis

      Well putt.  I’d add that West Bank territory like Nablus & Hebron belonged to Hebrews in biblical times.
      Too bad they can’t all live together like big boys & girls.
      Also, since Israel won the West Bank during the aftermath of the ’67 war with Jordan, Syria & Egypt I have to ask:  Who gives back land they win in a war” and since when do the losers make demands?

      • http://www.facebook.com/kim.holmstedt Kim Holmstedt

        So mass-expulsions and internments is ok by you? Israel has just passed a law criminalizing peacefull dissent. Some “democracy” huh? And apparently there is enopugh of a chasm in israel to make the authorities feel the need to criminalize it. You cannot defend this law and claim to defend basic democratic rights at the same time.

  • Anonymous

    No wonder Muslims HATE Israel and the USA…  WE have enabled Israel to become a Facist State…

  • Aaron Zilbermann

    The US has similar anti-boycott laws, and so does the EU:
    http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/antiboycottcompliance.htm
    If we are going to scrutinize the undemocratic behaviors of Israel, then we must do the same with other purportedly “democratic” nations.  It’s always frustrating to find myself in a position where the left alienates me because it criticizes Israel far beyond any other country with similar or worse behaviors, and the right alienates me because there is clearly a lack of interest in creating peace, a disregard for the basic rights of other ethnic groups, and a lack of logic when religion is used to defend heinous acts of violence and terrorism (both Judaism and Islam).  So I’m left floating in the middle, waiting for moderates on the left and right, Palestinians, Arabs, Isaelis and Jews, to step up and delegitimize the extremist factions on both sides that want to destroy peace.

  • Aaron Zilbermann

    The US has similar anti-boycott laws, and so does the EU:
    http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/antiboycottcompliance.htm
    If we are going to scrutinize the undemocratic behaviors of Israel, then we must do the same with other purportedly “democratic” nations.  It’s always frustrating to find myself in a position where the left alienates me because it criticizes Israel far beyond any other country with similar or worse behaviors, and the right alienates me because there is clearly a lack of interest in creating peace, a disregard for the basic rights of other ethnic groups, and a lack of logic when religion is used to defend heinous acts of violence and terrorism (both Judaism and Islam).  So I’m left floating in the middle, waiting for moderates on the left and right, Palestinians, Arabs, Isaelis and Jews, to step up and delegitimize the extremist factions on both sides that want to destroy peace.