Cartoons Against Bloodshed in Mexico

No Mas Sangre

by Shannon Young

When a mass movement emerged in Mexico this spring calling for a change of strategy in the drug war, a single image consistently appeared in the protests; the word “no” with a plus sign and a blood stain. It reads No Mas Sangre or No More Blood.

The emblem comes from a graphic campaign launched in January by a group of Mexican political cartoonists.

Cartoonist José Hernández says the campaign was the idea of Rius – the pen name of Eduardo del Rio – who urged his cartoonist colleagues to focus their criticism on the bloodshed. Hernandez says an immediate goal of the campaign was to change the media discourse on the issue of drug war violence.

For years, the dominant narrative – supported by official statements – was that 90 percent of the dead were linked to organized crime. Innocent murder victims were often downplayed as “collateral damage”.

But a major shift in public perception of just who the victims are came in March after the massacre of seven youths in Cuernavaca. One of the young men was the son of recognized poet Javier Sicilia. Within a week , the poet was helping to lead a nationwide protest movement that criticized both cartel violence and the government’s militarized strategy.

The critical groundwork laid by the cartoonists was evident, not only in the presence of the “no more blood” logo, but also in the views of some of the protestors.

At one rally, a retired woman named Winny carried a protest sign critical of mass media coverage in Mexico. She named the bimonthly political cartoon magazine “El Chamuco” as her preferred media. She says she feels avenged in the cartoons and that the information given in them is clear, concise, and precise – as well as a historical documentation.


As a hybrid of journalism and art, political cartoons rely on symbols and exaggeration to get their point across. This is perhaps why cartoonists are able to communicate certain ideas that print journalists either avoid or only touch on with subtleties.

“In Mexico, the language of politics and journalism is very cryptic,” says cartoonist Antonio Helguera. “If you don’t already have a background in the given subject, it’s very difficult to understand what’s happening. I think, that’s why so many people distance themselves from politics. In my own experience, I found that when I opened newspapers, the key to unlocking the messages were the cartoons. If you go by what the newspapers tell you directly, the messages are empty. Cartoons provide the keys to decode these messages.”

The drug war in Mexico has claimed well over 40,000 lives. Some estimates now put the toll at 50,000. Using a humorous medium like cartoons to address such a deadly issue can seem like walking a fine line, but Helguera says the limits are clear.

“We don’t direct our work against the victims of this war. We’re not laughing at them at all – quite the opposite. We focus our ridicule on the creators and promoters of this war. I’m referring to (President) Calderón and the secretaries of the armed forces and marines, the chief of the federal police and all those people. It’s against them. Therefore, there’s no risk of it turning into ridicule of victims because we never direct our criticisms against them – not even in the cases in which the victims were probably criminals – because, in the end, they’re dead. It’s just something you don’t do.”

Aside from covering current events, Mexican cartoonists have also assumed the role of popular educators. Mexico’s most influential cartoonist, Rius, has authored and illustrated more than a hundred books on topics that include philosophy, political theory and history – with a knack for making dense subject matter easily digestible.

In his 50-plus-year-career, Rius has earned a certain celebrity status within Mexico. A recent book signing in Mexico City drew a crowd of close to a thousand readers who lined up around the block.

Laura Flores – who stood in line for an hour and a half to have her book signed – says three generations of her family read and enjoy the works of Rius. She describes his books on Mexico in particular as excellent alternatives to the views and information available on television.

It’s precisely this type of education and self-awareness that cartoonist José Hernández says he hopes for as a larger outcome of the “No More Blood” campaign “because a society that’s informed and organized is less susceptible to manipulation and abuse.”

Discussion

9 comments for “Cartoons Against Bloodshed in Mexico”

  • Anonymous

    Bla bla bla

  • http://twitter.com/Bilinguish Bilinguish

    Thank you for such an interesting and informative piece.  I wonder why so much public anger is directed at the government and so little at the cartel leaders themselves?  In that slide show, the only cartel boss we saw depicted critically (or at all) was Chapo Guzman, who remains a folk hero in the north.  I have long thought that Calderon probably did not have a choice about starting a war with the cartels, because to do otherwise would have been capitulation of his whole government to corruption.  (Not to say that may not have happened anyway.)  When the military loses a soldier in a shootout with a drug boss, and shortly after the soldier’s funeral gunmen massacre his mother, sisters and aunts, why do the people of a country that purports to value its mothers not protest in revulsion? After the massacre in the casino in Monterrey last month, why is Calderon the only bad guy?

    • http://twitter.com/Chalalu Adrián

      Calderón and El Chapo are partners. He is the thief who stole the presidency, and El Chapo is the one who wants to take over the whole drug bussines in Mexico like a Monopoly game. When the cartoonists depict Calderon and not “drug lords” they are just hitting the weakest link in the chain. Thats why.

    • http://twitter.com/rafaMEX3 rafaMEX

      If you get bitten by a Lion in a circus, who would you blame? the Lion or the circus  personel resposible of taking care that the lion doesnt goes out of control in the first place? that’s why we blame the President and not the cartels, cartels are criminal and we all blame them by default, it would be silly to complain against them requesting to stop doing what they do, they will simply kill you, thats why criminals are FORCED by the AUTHORITY  to stop breaking the law and send them to  jail, just like the lion doesn’t understand you, cartels doesn’t care whatever you say.  

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting and informative reporting.  Quite sure that this is really what’s going on as opposed to what the media reports.  I would think that not only the cartoonists, but even those reporting on the cartoonists’ mission could likely be in harms way.  Thanks for , but please be safe.
    Dandine

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting and informative reporting.  Quite sure that this is really what’s going on as opposed to what the media reports.  I would think that not only the cartoonists, but even those reporting on the cartoonists’ mission could likely be in harms way.  Thanks for , but please be safe.
    Dandine

  • http://elvira21.livejournal.com/ Itzel

    Yes indeed RafaMex, you are right in saying that the goverment has the responsibility of punishing the cartels, but why do we concentrate in the one politician that has taken initiative, not an ideal or even a  eficient  one mind you,but an initiative anyway,  when so many others past  politicians in charge of the state not only didnt do anything about this problem for years, but let the cartels grow and even are personally involved with them are ignored? The Cartels didnt begin to exist with Calderon`s period or even Fox`s, they were formed way before their time and now part of the  goverment, and especially , the people, has to deal with them. I do like mr Rius work, but we need to have a bigger picture in mind of our actual problem in order to deal with it more effectively instead of coming back  to our confort zone and blaming the head of state for everything. 
     
    As Mr Sicilia said during one of his speches, if only Calderon were the problem we could only take him out of office, but is the entire system the one who needs  a  radical change if we are to deal with this and a lot others situations, and that involves a lot more than just Calderon. About the Circus allegory, it would be right if Calderon was actually in charge of the Cartels, like the circus is in charge of the Lion, but thas is not true and even if that were the case, why whould he be fighting himself?, you could argue that the ones in charge of the cartels are their motives, drugs, money and weapons, who sells them weapons, who buys their drugs, who is in charge of their money, who protects them and handle them information, etc. This problem is a lot more complex than what it seems.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cristina-Camacho/501592569 Cristina Camacho

    This is quite a biased slideshow, as it only shows a couple of cartoonists. Why not show a couple “more” with a different perspective? (Don’t you think, BBC?) What was published on a Spanish newspaper a couple of weeks ago is true: Mexicans have totally blamed Calderón alone for the war on terror, and they even name this “Calderón’s war”. The cartoons clearly show this. I wonder, in fact, I am sure, that the PRI politicians -who for once started and allowed all this during their 70-year regime- are laughing Calderón off the stage so they can get the presidency back. And not just them. All Mexicans are to blame. We have allowed this to happen and now try to find a scapegoat on the one person in office who has stood up against drug cartels. But oh, no! let him fight this alone, I am too busy as a Mexican citizen with my own problems. “Que se encargue el gobierno”.

  • Anonymous

    Antonio “El guero” lol…them yanks cant’ pronounce any spanish apart from burritos, can they?

FUNDERS