Egypt’s Revolution Giving Way to Sense of Lost Opportunity

Steven Cook (Photo: Council on Foreign Relations)

Steven Cook (Photo: Council on Foreign Relations)

Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations is visiting Cairo for the third time this year. He says excitement and optimism have given way to a sense of drift and lost opportunity.

 

Read the Transcript
The text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

 

Lisa Mullins: Just as the new Liberia is emerging from the ashes of war, a new Egypt is beginning to emerge from its post revolutionary chaos.  Problem is nobody’s quite sure what the new Egypt will end up looking like.  Steven Cook is a senior fellow from Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.  He’s now in Cairo.  Cook arrived there just after protestors stormed the Israeli embassy there. He says Egypt today feels much different from the Egypt he witnessed back in January at the height of protests against President Hosni Mubarak.

 

Steven Cook: January was a time of tremendous hope and anticipation about the possibility of building a new descent, more open, democratic political system.  When I returned in June I think that there was still a sense that that was possible and although there were a whole host of problems that kind of revolutionary creativity and energy was still very much at play. Here, now, in September there’s a tremendous sense of duress and perhaps lost opportunity.  The problems keep mounting, it’s a complex situation.  There’s a sense really that no one is in charge here.

 

Mullins: But there is a leadership, at least a temporary leadership right now, and it is a leadership that has overseen what has been happening in the last few days.  I mean you arrived right after the Israeli embassy there had been ransacked forcing in fact, the Israeli ambassador to flee.  Can you explain why this is happening and if sentiment has turned against Israel?

 

Cook: Well, there’s been for a long time sentiment that has run opposed to Israel and among many of the youth activists that instigated the revolution has long had ill feelings toward Israel.  But this particular situation has to be situated in a context of something that happened about 10 days before in which Israeli forces killed six Egyptian soldiers on Egyptian territory. This was clearly by mistake, but the Israelis have been slow to express their regret, and at the time there were demand for the recall of the Egyptian ambassador from Tel Aviv and to kick the Israelis out.  The march on the Israeli embassy was conducted by a few people and many people regretted it and thought that despite their feelings toward Israel it was Egypt’s responsibility to protect the embassy. So by no means was this a widely held sentiment that they go after the Israeli embassy, but nevertheless, sentiment, the political climate in which public opinion matters more in Egypt is likely to run against Israel and the United States for that matter.

 

Mullins: And how is that exemplifying itself against Israel or the United States aside from the violence…

 

Cook: Well, I think that in general, there has a been a call for a renegotiation of the Camp David Accords for a, there’s a pipeline that runs gas from Al-Arish to Ashkelon in  Isreal, demands that the company that runs that pipeline renegotiate the prices that it sells the gas to the Israelis. For the United States it signals that the Egyptians are interested in reestablishing diplomatic relations with Iran after some odd years, a renewed or different perspective on Hamas, some of the key issues for the United States in the Middle East.  And much of this is being driven by public opinion.

 

Mullins: How much American aid, foreign aid comes to Egypt now per year?

 

Cook: Well, there’s $1.3 billion that is allotted annually to the military, and then most recently there’s been about $250 million in economic aid to the masses, $1.55 billion dollars.  It’s less than what we’d been giving in years past, considerably so.  In the mid 1980s Egypt got more than $2 billion a year.  It’s still a significant amount of money, but in an economy that is over $100 billion economy it’s really a drop in the bucket.

 

Mullins: But even it is a drop in the bucket it still comes with strings attached, I mean America still wants to keep Egypt as its ally.  The new Egypt now, does it need America the way Egypt under Mubarak did?

 

Cook: Well, in some ways it needs it more and there was some hope that the United States would step up very quickly and provide in particular, economic assistance for the new Egypt.  But at the same time there is significant sentiment that the United States should stay out of Egyptian politics.  There was a perception that President Mubarak was too close to the United States and public opinion generally doesn’t like the idea of the United States trying to influence or manage this transition. So in one sense the Egyptians very much want our technical assistance and our economic assistance, but at the same time would like us to take hands off of their building a new political system.

 

Mullins: Steven Cook is a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council of Foreign Relations.  He spoke to us from Cairo.

 

Copyright ©2009 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.

Discussion

2 comments for “Egypt’s Revolution Giving Way to Sense of Lost Opportunity”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Y6L6FTDBJYFKOHEZCN6BO6ZEGQ dorn

    This afternoon (Wed. 14 Sept.) Steven Cook claimed that SIX Egyptian
    policemen were killed accidentally by Israeli troops, and that Israel
    was slow to apologize.

    He is wrong on both accounts. The most I have ever seen referred to
    before is FIVE, and all the initial accounts said THREE – and even
    circumstances around those are disputed. And Israel did apologize very
    quickly, and asked for a joint enquiry very quickly.

    It is very sad that Mr. Cook should so distort issues. He knows well
    the real issue – for decades, anti-Israel incitement was a staple of
    Mubarak’s media. Hatred for the West, Israel, Jews was one of the sole
    permissible distractions. The same was true across the Middle east.

    How long will it take The World to stop punting every PRETEXT for mob violence in Cairo as a CAUSE?

    Did Israelis riot because the terrorists that killed 8 Israelis came
    from Egypt, and by many accounts, were allowed to do so by Egyptian
    soldiers?

    Maybe you should have watched the PBS Newshour crew (Margaret Warner et
    al) report how they were attacked by a mob outside Israel’s embassy,
    and  about the lawlessness in Cairo?

    What we are never told, is that anti-Israel sentiment builds on 1400
    years of anti-semitism that has religious roots; nor are we ever told
    of the history endured by Jews in Arab countries. Yet after all that,
    the Jewish refugees from Arab lands looked forward, rebuilt their lives
    in Israel. Compare this to 63 years of cynical Arab manipulation of
    Arab refugees and their descendants.

    Nor are we ever told that economic conditions are far better on the
    West Bank than in Egypt, Jordan, Syria, … . Nor is there ever any
    mention that Fatah and Hamas cannot even agree on a common prime
    minister, nor could they even agree on a common clock time for Gaza and
    the West Bank.
     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Y6L6FTDBJYFKOHEZCN6BO6ZEGQ dorn