Relations Souring Among US Allies In The Middle East

Protesters storm Israeli embassy in Cairo. (Photo: Al Jazeera/YouTube)

Protesters storm Israeli embassy in Cairo. (Photo: Al Jazeera/YouTube)

by Derek Stoffel

Turkey’s Prime Minister visited Cairo, Egypt on Monday. Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s trip couldn’t come at a more tense time.

There were violent demonstrations in Cairo over the weekend. The Israeli embassy was attacked, and most of that country’s diplomatic staff were evacuated.

Erodgan went to show his support for the overthrow of the Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak earlier this year. And to sympathize. Many in Egypt are angry after five of their police officers was killed when Israeli troops went after gunmen who launched an attack last month.

Omar Ashour is a Middle East analyst at the University of Exeter in England. He said Erdogan’s trip is well-timed.

“I think he will get an extremely warm welcome on the unofficial popular level – and from the political parties and political groups,” Ashour said. “Many of the Islamist groups perceive him to be a bit of a model to pursue. Many of the nationalists leftist groups are happy with his position regarding Israel after the Marmara attack.”

That attack last year has led to what some analysts call a new low in Turkish-Israeli relations. Turkey is angry that Israel refused to apologize for the deadly raid on the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish ship that was trying to deliver aid to Gaza.

Israel expressed regret for the loss of life, but officials have said they have nothing to apologize for.

On the weekend Erdogan called the attack “grounds for war,” but the Turkish leader said he opted instead for a diplomatic solution to the incident. Relations between the two countries recently though are anything but diplomatic. Turkey kicked Israel’s ambassador out of the country last week.

Israel has been left isolated by the Arab spring, and so it walks the difficult line of defending its security, while not further isolating one of its few regional allies.

Mark Regev speaks for the Israeli government.

“Historically, Jewish people and Turkish people have a very strong relationship, but we’ve had problems over the last few months, maybe even longer and that’s regrettable,” Regev said. “We’re willing and want to see an improvement in the relationship, we hope it’s still possible.”

No doubt many here in Israel will watch Erodogan’s visit to the three Arab nations this week with much interest.

Analysts such as Bertrand Badie of the Center for International Studies and Research in Paris believe the Turkish prime minister wants to be a bigger player. In fact, he said we’re witnessing the “birth of a regional power.”

“Turkey’s probably trying to take benefit from the political vacuum in the Arab world as Turkey is more and more powerful in the region,” Badie said. “The relationships between Turkey and its Arab neighbors – as well as Israel – will be less warm but probably more efficient and probably more powerful.”

That is a clear worry in Israel, as Erdogan has strongly backed the bid by Palestinians for statehood at the United Nations. For its part, Washington has appealed for restraint from both the Israeli and Turkish governments.

Discussion

6 comments for “Relations Souring Among US Allies In The Middle East”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Y6L6FTDBJYFKOHEZCN6BO6ZEGQ dorn

    Why is it that The World always points to Israel actions (actually

    reactions) as the cause of its issues with neighbors?

    Why is it that you always use biased terminology?

    Today (Monday 12 September) your correspondent Derek Stoffel from

    Jerusalem, talked of Egyptian anger over the death of five Egyptian

    policemen (allegedly) killed by Israelis going after GUNMEN. Those

    gunmen were attacking Israeli buses and civilians – and in any other

    country would be called terrorists, or at the least militants. Nor is it

    clear that Israeli troops were responsible for the deaths of the five

    Egyptians.

    Then there was his talk about a Turkish ship that “delivered aid to

    Gaza”. There was little aid aboard the Avi Marmara – it was a propaganda

    exercise, funded by the Turkish government, which provided the ship to

    the IHH.

    Why doesn’t The World mention the deaths of Israeli civilians in the

    terror attacks on the Gaza border? Why does The World not mention that

    those aboard the “aid ships” attacked Israeli soldiers, seriously

    wounding them – and only then did Israelis fire back.

    Nor is there a hint that Israeli troops were attacked and seriously

    wounded before they opened fire, nor that the Turkish government

    provided the ship to the IHH, and helped sponsor the propaganda exercise.
     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Y6L6FTDBJYFKOHEZCN6BO6ZEGQ dorn

    Even more damning is the failure to provide any analysis, in this and

    several other recent articles, of the real core issues in the

    relationship. The decline in Israeli-Turkish relations has little to do

    with the Gaza flotilla.

    That is a pretext, and Lisa Mullins, Anthony Shadid know that well. It

    is a deliberate ploy by the Islamist AKP government to build up its

    standing in the region. Turkey has staged a number of deliberate public

    embarrassments of Israel long before the flotilla (including the walkout

    by Turkey at Davos). It has drawn closer to Iran and Syria (the latter

    until recently), its government funded TV has screened anti-semitic and

    anti-Israel series punting blood libels; its officials have attended

    Holocaust denial conferences.

    The most cursory examination of Egyptian media during President

    Mubarak’s time (see e.g. http://www.memri.org) shows that it was filled with

    the most virulent anti-Israel propaganda, often anti-semitic too.

    Egypt’s TV ran soaps based on blood libels. Governors of the Sinai

    blamed Israel for shark attacks (and that was reported). Mubarak abused

    hatred of Israel and the West, as the sole permissible political

    distraction from his own oppressive policies. In addition, he kept a

    very cold peace, preventing the academic, economic, and cultural ties

    that were promised by the Israeli-Egypt peace accords.

    That indoctrination (which built on longstanding anti-semitism that

    predated the state of Israel, and the expulsion of all Jews from Egypt

    between 1948 and 1967) has left a legacy, that political parties of all

    shades are abusing.
     

  • Carlos R Canas

    Israel’s log term national security rests on solving the israeli-palestinian conflict. Adopting a myopic and hard-line attitude only worsens Israel’s isolation and increases its insecurity.  The israeli prime minister not only scorned the efforts of President Obama (and President Bush) to open talks with the palestinians, but continues to pursue an agressive settlement policy.  Israel might feel secure behind it wall, but remember, the chinese wall eventually proved inefective, and so did the Berlin wall.  Remember, the palestinian birth rate is much higher than the israeli, and Israel might now be sitting on a ticking population bomb.

    Yes it is true that the Hamas are terrorists, but Israel policies gives them and a propaganda vehicle to gain recruits and justify their actions.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1282417375 Asher B. Garber

      What hardline Israeli stance? The Israelis had offered two states to the Palestinians in a 10 year period and got only missiles, kidnappings, and the throats of babies slit in return.

      “Yes it is true that the Hamas are terrorists, but Israel policies gives
      them and a propaganda vehicle to gain recruits and justify their
      actions”

      That’s a slippery slope, and not to mention completely one-sided. Because you and I both know that the “Apartheid” wall was developed AFTER multiple suicide bombings took place in Jerusalem.

      But I keep forgetting. How could 100 milliion Muslims be wrong while only 10 million Jews could be right?

  • Anonymous

    Well, until several Arab countries declare a hot war on Israel it can’t really be an “all time low.”

    It really feels as if Erdogan’s administration is playing politics to suddenly come up with this demand. Why did they not demand this apology a year ago, but rather wait for the wounds to heal, only to reopen them? Also, how is the Gaza Blockade relevant to Turkey? Again, this feels like political posturing by the more right wing elements of turkey’s political spectrum.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1282417375 Asher B. Garber

    Storming an embassy actually is flaunting international law. I am not shocked that the pro-Palestinian posters who pilferred this website with outlandish accusations attacking the Israel and World Jewry (i.e. the Israel/Jewish Lobby) in May are silent are silent about this incident.