Education in Libya After Gaddafi

Play
Download

Young girls in Benghazi accompany their father to a one of the many demonstrations in support of the rebels near the city's main courthouse. (Photo: Al Jazeera English)

Young girls in Benghazi accompany their father to a one of the many demonstrations in support of the rebels near the city's main courthouse. (Photo: Al Jazeera English)


Since the toppling and ultimate death of former Libyan president Muammar Gaddafi, change is the watchword in Libya.

A new prime minister has been named, a new transitional government is imminent, and new portraits of fallen martyrs replace pictures of Gaddafi in public spaces.

But perhaps one of the most crucial changes is happening in more discreet locations – in schools, all across the country.

Over his more than four decades of dictatorship, Gaddafi used the country’s schools to get his ideology into the minds of his citizens.

From primary to university level, Libya’s national curriculum is now being cleansed of Gaddafi’s far-reaching influence.

“We don’t want anything that signifies him – neither his name, his family, nor his symbols and signature green color,” said Mohammed Sawi, director of the National Curriculum Reform Office, which is based in Tripoli

It’s a newly formed team of 160 experts charged with rewriting curriculum throughout Libya’s entire public school system.

For now, the Libyan experts are doing an initial, rapid purge of the most flagrant pro-Gaddafi elements in schools. It’s a stop-gap solution until Libya’s transitional period ends and a new government is elected in eight months. Then, according to Sawi, the larger task of long-term revision will start.

“There are no foreign experts because what we are doing is provisional, for one year,” Sawi said. “After that, experts will be brought in from abroad and we will do an international conference to see what we can do in term of broader changes to the curriculum.”

Getting Rid of Subjects

For now, the easiest change is getting rid of subjects like Al-Mujtama Al-Jamahariya, the study of the “Green Book” – Gaddafi’s core treatise on politics and civic life.

But beyond that, many remaining subjects require severe changes. Gaddafi, a strident anti-colonialist, refused to allow what he considered “Western” symbols – for instance, “cm” for centimeters and “kg” for kilogram. Hatem Mhenni, a member of the reform committee, said all symbols in Libyan education will be changed to meet international norms.

“We changed all the symbols that were in Arabic before into Latin script,” Mhenni said. “We corrected many spelling errors and technical errors as well.”

History, which had amounted to glorifying Gaddafi and his regime, is being rewritten from scratch. Until that’s done, the subject has been suspended from the national curriculum.

Subjects like geography would seem less problematic. But education reformer Mahmoud al Chawadi said maps in Libyan schoolbooks were used to confuse rather than inform the students.

“Gaddafi was afraid that the students or their parents could revolt at any time, so it was important that they feel far from each other,” Chawadi said. “So in the maps, he created a big separation between east and west Libya – a vast, impenetrable desert – to disorient people and make sure they felt divided, not united.”

Officials have said that schools won’t have a more Islamic bent, though they will add a subject called Islamic Consciousness. But like everything else in Libya now, it’s hard to predict how schooling will shake out until the constitution is written and a new government is chosen.

But these days, the Ministry of Education’s eyes are set on more immediate goals: the new, temporary curriculum and textbooks set to roll out to an estimated one million Libyan students by January 14th.

Until then, classes continue at places like the Rixos Technical High School in Tripoli.

Larger Education Goals

The school’s principal, Brahim Al Hajaji, said the larger goal of removing the false ideas and mentalities cultivated through more than four decades of Gaddafi indoctrination may take quite a long time.

“I think a lot about the future of the students and the children of this country,” said Al Hajaji. “The big challenge is the little kids who love Gaddafi and don’t know why they love him.”

17-year-old Epthal Abu Bakker said whenever she used to criticize Gaddafi, other kids would tease her and beat her. Now the power has changed, and Epthal can express her opinions without danger.

“We have to know, the children have to know, what they missed before,” Epthal said. “About the grandparents, the old people, how they were. We have to know why Gaddafi came, why he did all that.”

With the dictator gone, Libya’s future is uncertain – the country is awash in weapons, and the revolutionaries are finding it hard to be good politicians.

But in the country’s schools, the horizon is relatively bright — assuming the country’s political journey continues smoothly.

Discussion

One comment for “Education in Libya After Gaddafi”

  • Anonymous

    Education in new
    Libya is in need of radical change, can the
    transitional government take action before it is
    too late?

    This is a message to the transitional government,
    which confirmed that one of its priorities is the reform of the education
    sector. Has the government already begun the reform of this sector?

    Ameen Rihani defines the Renaissance, by saying ‘I
    understand the renaissance by the revolution on the old, which has become
    sterile, and the old, which has become obsolete, and the old, which was corrupt
    from the start, whether it was in believes or sciences or literature.

    There is no doubt that the success of general
    policies depends on the success of policies directed at education in all its
    levels  and in order for these policies to succeed and achieve their
    goals, the education policies should be successful and achieve its objectives.

     

    The reform of education/education reform can only
    be achieved by a radical change to all those who occupied positions of
    leadership in the Ministry of Education and were responsible for public
    policies for the sector, which was the reason for the failure and collapse of
    the sector and resulted in the collapse of state institutions.

     

    Unfortunately the same group, which was at the top
    of hierarchy of this ministry during Gaddffi’s reign, has been reselected.  one example is the deputy minister, who was
    the director of curriculum and private education and the further example is the
    director of  curriculum centre. Furthermore they are other ministry
    officials who have been reappointed, who must also bear the burden of serious
    mistakes committed in education. These mistakes began with the signing of
    contracts of flawed curriculum and adoption of Singapore’s curriculum.

     

    One example of flawed curriculum is teaching
    a topic in maths curriculum for year six of primary education, which is overly
    difficult for learners to understand. The topic deals with ratio and proportion.
    This can be seen in (Maths book , First semester, Exercise 4, Page 91) which
    tackles six problems that cannot be understood or solved by most maths teachers
    due to difficulty of the topic.  There are also many disadvantages of this
    curriculum, which should be reviewed by the ministry.

    And what about the assessment marks for subjects
    of multiples of 40 instead of 100? This system of marking is confusing and
    incomprehensible to most learners, parents and teachers.

     

    The education ministry produced a study plan on
    its website which begins with mistakes in the title of the document that was
    signed and adopted by the ministry officials and parked errors (parked errors -
    don’t know what this means) in the table of the plan. They also produced
    schemes of work characterized with lack of debugging and modifying curricula
    and defects in the division of the lessons.

    The ministry has said nothing about the summative
    assessment method of the electronic examinations, which is not suitable for
    assessing subjects such as mathematics, Arabic and other materials. Has the
    ministry changed the method?

     

    Anyone can clearly see the poor performance of the
    education ministry; all Libyans were waiting for plans for the future outlined
    by the Ministry to reform the sector since the liberation of Tripoli .Isn’t it
    to be expected that those interested in the education sector will be able to find
    out everything about education on the ministry’s website, But its website only
    broadcasts news about meetings, events and lectures, and most of the icons and
    options for the site are either ineffective or outdated.

    Has the ministry reformed and purged the centre of
    technologies and maintenance of educational facilities by dismissal of everyone
    who was corrupted and not just dismissal of its director? Have the
    contracts of the board marks been reviewed? Is the ministry aware that
    companies have been assigned to import Chinese board marks with bad quality and
    companies which imported good quality German-made board marks have been
    abandoned, despite the cost of German-made board marks being cheaper than
    Chinese ones?

    Is the ministry aware that the director of
    equippings at that centre was professing by saying (he loves the brother
    leader) and the revolutionary legitimacy was important criterion for his
    arrival to that office?

    Is it possible, at this critical time, the
    ministry allows previous contracts of schools’ furniture and offices to pass of
    which corruption was the most important features? these contracts are worth
    more than  63 million Libyan dinars?

    What about the smart boards which cost more than
    3,000 Libyan dinars each? It has been said that the ministry would
    introduce the smart board to schools where most teachers can’t use computers, let
    alone use the Internet and e-learning.

     

    I’ve kept asking these questions over and over again;
    first in my program on Radio Libya Alhurra FM in September and October last
    year and then in a TV program in which I was a guest and directed some of the
    these questions to the Minister of Education, who was a guest of the same
    channel the next day, but did not answer any of the questions I put forward. I
    also have sent these questions via e-mail to the website of the ministry and
    the transitional government and posted an article about the issue on many
    Libyan websites including the education minister facebook page.

     

    Finally the education replied to my article on
    Friday 13 Jan 2012 saying ‘Mr.
    Fhelboom, this is first time I came across your article. I am sorry, I have not
    heard these repetitive appeals and questions, you are free to criticize whoever
    you want but I do not agree with the criticism of some people mentioned in your
    article. I agree with your view that the difficulty of many topics in the new curriculum
    and difficulty of applying this curriculum in Libyan schools at this present
    time. I do not have on my own the authority to issue a decision to cancel curriculum
    or change the educational system. Therefore, we have adopted the Educational
    Forum which will discuss all matters relating to curriculum and education
    policies in our country, and it will involve teachers and educational
    inspectors in addition to the head teachers and civil society institutions,
    parents and students. We hope your participation in this event. The forum will
    start its activities in the beginning of February in all Libyan cities, and it
    will be under the supervision of educational guidance Office of in each city.
    My best regards and respect.’

     

    Despite
    the minister has not answered many of my questions but the reply was a sign of
    a new democratic free Libya.

    Last but
    not least I wish to see the answers to all of these questions.

     

    Reda
    Fhelboom

    Journalist
    and Political activists

    Co-founder of the Libyan association
    for free media (LA4FM) and Tadhamon Association for human rights
    support (fhelboom@yahoo.com)