Farms, Factories, and a Dangerous Nitrogen Overload

Play
Download

Robert Law (Photo: Laura Lynch)

Robert Law (Photo: Laura Lynch)

Robert Law raises sheep and grows sugar beets, wheat, barley oats and rye on his farm about an hour north of London. It’s a big operation set on nearly 4,000 acres of rolling hills near the town of Royston, and there’s one key ingredient that makes it all flourish—nitrogen fertilizer.

Law says he uses it for almost all his crops, because his land is inherently very low in naturally-available nitrogen, which plants need to thrive.

Law is hardly alone. The invention of nitrogen based fertilizer in 1909 helped fuel a global agricultural boom, and it’s been crucial in feeding a growing population ever since.

But a growing number of scientists say that boon to our food supply has come at a big cost—massive nitrogen-based pollution.

Mark Sutton, of the Center for Ecology and Hydrology in the United Kingdom, sums up the dilemma: “We’ve known for many years that using nitrogen for fertilizer is a great thing for farming to increase productivity,” Sutton says. “But there’s a whole range of threats resulting from this nitrogen leaking into the environment.”

Nitrogen itself is an inert gas that’s necessary for life. But Sutton says we’re changing it into forms that are harmful, overloading the environment with it, and throwing the natural nitrogen cycle out of whack.

Nitrogen compounds running off farmland have led to water pollution problems around the world, while nitrogen emissions from industry, agriculture and vehicles make a big contribution to air pollution.

“Massive cost” from Nitrogen Pollution in the EU

Sutton says the cost of all of these impacts is immense. Last year he was part of a team of 200 scientists from 21 countries who studied the problem in the European Union. They calculated the dollar value of the damage of nitrogen pollution at between 90 and 400 billion dollars a year.

That’s “a massive number,” Sutton says.

The cost comes to both the environment and human health. For instance, Sutton says, particulate air pollution caused in part by nitrogen shortens the lives of many Europeans by more than a year.

Overall, the EU report estimated that the cost of nitrogen pollution in the EU is more than double the value that nitrogen fertilizers add to European farm income.

“So these are significant issues,” Sutton says.

The EU study is the first to calculate these costs in Europe. But Alan Townsend, an ecologist at the University of Colorado, says nitrogen pollution is “unquestionably” a global problem.

Townsend says the US is also a major hotspot, and that big problems are emerging in China, Southeast Asia and Latin America.

The impacts of nitrogen pollution can be hard to recognize. Big environmental disasters like oil spills tend to grab all the attention, Townsend says, but “there is essentially a nitrogen spill everyday.”

The irony is that in the right places and chemical forms, nitrogen is valuable stuff. Every ounce of fertilizer that runs off a field into a river is a waste of resources and money.

“Solutions are Right in Front of Us”

But Townsend says it’s a problem that shouldn’t be that hard to solve.

“This is not one of those problems where we sit around scratching our heads and say, ‘Man this is going to be a disaster, how are we going to deal with it, there’s nothing we can do,’” he says. “A lot of the solutions are right in front of us. It’s just about moving down that path.”

That path includes increasing the use of technology to cut nitrogen pollutants from power plants and vehicles, which is already widely used in the US and Europe.

Cutting nitrogen pollution from food production is a more complicated challenge, but Townsend says on the farm field itself, it comes down to a simple principle: use fertilizer more efficiently.

“We have to approach it as an efficiency problem,” he says. “How do we maximize the benefits that we’re going to get from this stuff and minimize the unwanted consequences?”

Farmworker Mark Moule (Photo: Laura Lynch)

Farmworker Mark Moule (Photo: Laura Lynch)

Royston farmer Robert Law is trying to rise to that challenge. He prides himself on running a farm that’s not only productive, but environmentally sensitive.

His tractor now sports a small computer console with which his farmhands can ensure that each field gets only the exact amount of fertilizer it needs, depending on the crop, the season and the weather.

“We just program each individual field as we come to it,” says Law’s farmworker Mark Moule. ”Just press start and finish and one minute you’ll be putting 50 kilos on per hectare next minutes it’s a hundred and fifty.”

That kind of precision helps reduce the amount of nitrogen that runs off farm fields into nearby streams. It can also help save money on fertilizer.

Economic & Demographic Challenges

But this kind of technology is expensive, and many smaller farms can’t afford it.

For his part, Law is willing to look for even more efficient ways to use fertilizer. But he warns that Britain and the rest of the world face a growing challenge when it comes to feeding a growing population.

“The area available for farming in this country is getting smaller each year,” Law laments. “Roads are being built, towns are being built.”

It’s a global trend—less farmland and more mouths to feed. And that will only add to the challenge of getting rid of the excess nitrogen we’ve been putting into the environment.

Discussion

6 comments for “Farms, Factories, and a Dangerous Nitrogen Overload”

  • michael kahn

    What the story does not point out explicitly is that without this additional nitrogen, we can’t grow enough food to feed the number of people on the planet now–by about a factor of 2-3.  Adding nitrogen produced by chemistry to the list of available farm inputs has had a major effect–the Green Revolution–that now has us in a position of dependency.

  • Anonymous

    We’ve got big “nitrogen spill” problems on our
    side of the pond as well, with a dead-zone every summer in the Gulf of Mexico. 
    The largest contributor to the Gulf dead-zone is agriculture.  Corn (or
    maize in the UK) accounts for the largest share of agricultural pollution draining
    into the Gulf, and what is the largest user of corn in the US? 
    Ethanol. 

    That’s why we argued recently there is a corn ethanol “spill” every day (http://goo.gl/Nuj5J). 
    High tech application of fertilizer is not enough, we need to change the crop
    mix to address the problems.  The good news is that we can do better, by
    moving fuel production to water-wise crops like perennial grasses (http://goo.gl/NC0Yz)
    and targeting these crops to places that are less suitable for annual crops, we
    can protect water resources and maintain high agricultural productivity (http://goo.gl/t5x75). 
     
    Jeremy Martin, Ph.D.
    Union of Concerned Scientists (ucsusa.org)

  • Anonymous

    We’ve got big “nitrogen spill” problems on our
    side of the pond as well, with a dead-zone every summer in the Gulf of Mexico. 
    The largest contributor to the Gulf dead-zone is agriculture.  Corn (or
    maize in the UK) accounts for the largest share of agricultural pollution draining
    into the Gulf, and what is the largest user of corn in the US? 
    Ethanol. 

    That’s why we argued recently there is a corn ethanol “spill” every day (http://goo.gl/Nuj5J). 
    High tech application of fertilizer is not enough, we need to change the crop
    mix to address the problems.  The good news is that we can do better, by
    moving fuel production to water-wise crops like perennial grasses (http://goo.gl/NC0Yz)
    and targeting these crops to places that are less suitable for annual crops, we
    can protect water resources and maintain high agricultural productivity (http://goo.gl/t5x75). 
     
    Jeremy Martin, Ph.D.
    Union of Concerned Scientists (ucsusa.org)

  • Anonymous

    Jeremy Martin’s point about changing the crop mix is on
    target.  There are a number of ecological approaches to agriculture that
    can reduce nitrogen pollution and that need at least as much attention as the
    tractor-mounted computers described in Lynch’s article (http://tinyurl.com/UCS-NSF11).

     

    In the U.S., our agricultural landscape is increasingly
    dominated by corn, which receives large amounts of nitrogen fertilizer each
    year – much of which ends up in rivers, streams and, ultimately, the Gulf of Mexico.  
    And most of that corn is not used directly to feed people but instead is used
    as animal feed, for processed foods, or to produce ethanol.  By growing a
    more diverse mix of crops on the landscape, we can grow less corn each year, which
    means applying less nitrogen to the landscape, and therefore reducing nitrogen
    pollution to local waters and the Gulf, emission of nitrous oxide (a powerful
    greenhouse gas) from soils, and soil degradation  – all while growing plentiful, nutritious
    food.

     

    Public policies and subsidies have an enormous influence on
    farmers’ decisions.  In the United States, we need a Farm Bill – up for
    reauthorization by Congress this year – that encourages farmers to use diverse
    crop mixes including cover crops that trap excess nitrogen.

    Noel P. Gurwick, Ph.D.
    Union of Concerned Scientists (ucsusa.org)

  • don ohmes

    And if someone has evolved a novel method for growing many vegetable crops that sharply reduces “artificial” N inputs, who will pay them for the knowledge and how much? Note — not a joke, but a serious question…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Youngun-Song/100003323732183 Youngun Song