Comments on: Pakistan Troubled By US Remarks About Bin Laden Capture http://www.theworld.org/2012/01/pakistan-panetta-bin-laden-capture/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pakistan-panetta-bin-laden-capture Global Perspectives for an American Audience Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: yrag01 http://www.theworld.org/2012/01/pakistan-panetta-bin-laden-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-23199 yrag01 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:21:00 +0000 http://www.theworld.org/?p=104683#comment-23199 I hope our government does everything it can to help, and help free doctor Shakeel Afridi. He deserves it for his service to the world. The fact that the good doctor was charged with treason against Pakistan for his help tracking down Osama bin Laden tells me that (at least a portion of) the Pakistani leadership ARE OUR ENEMIES. With it's clear support and sponsoship of terror in Afganistan AND our friends in India there is something so bizarre and troubling going on in the Pakistani Military that DEMANDS we confront--especially if the elected civilian government is in fear of it. I hope our government does everything it can to help, and help free doctor Shakeel Afridi. He deserves it for his service to the world.

The fact that the good doctor was charged with treason against Pakistan for his help tracking down Osama bin Laden tells me that (at least a portion of) the Pakistani leadership ARE OUR ENEMIES.

With it’s clear support and sponsoship of terror in Afganistan AND our friends in India there is something so bizarre and troubling going on in the Pakistani Military that DEMANDS we confront–especially if the elected civilian government is in fear of it.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.theworld.org/2012/01/pakistan-panetta-bin-laden-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-23196 Anonymous Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:49:00 +0000 http://www.theworld.org/?p=104683#comment-23196 It appears from the number of comments on the program segments that I've viewed online (averaging zero) that you don't have any listeners, so I really shouldn't worry about the retrograde propaganda you broadcast. I was particularly bothered by this story, heard on my local NPR station, and even worse than the usual NPR fair. To describe the US slaughter of Pakistani soldiers as a "cross border clash" is like discussing an interspecies clash between Colonel Sanders and a flock of chickens. The outcome was so one-sided because it was a unprovoked, unexpected, unilateral attack by the US, not a "clash."  The US government did not "bag" Bin Laden, they murdered him. Murder is a useful, honest word, Laura, you should get it into your vocabulary. It appears from the number of comments on the program segments that I’ve viewed online (averaging zero) that you don’t have any listeners, so I really shouldn’t worry about the retrograde propaganda you broadcast. I was particularly bothered by this story, heard on my local NPR station, and even worse than the usual NPR fair. To describe the US slaughter of Pakistani soldiers as a “cross border clash” is like discussing an interspecies clash between Colonel Sanders and a flock of chickens. The outcome was so one-sided because it was a unprovoked, unexpected, unilateral attack by the US, not a “clash.”  The US government did not “bag” Bin Laden, they murdered him. Murder is a useful, honest word, Laura, you should get it into your vocabulary.

]]>