Rwanda Lake Poses Gas Danger, Energy Promise

On the job into the evening, workers re-enforce rails guiding the methane extraction barge into Lake Kivu. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

On the job into the evening, workers re-enforce rails guiding the methane extraction barge into Lake Kivu. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

In the early evening on Lake Kivu, along Rwanda’s western border, clusters of lights bob on the surface of the water. They’re lanterns hanging off wooden boats to attract small herring.

Lake Kivu’s fish are a crucial source of food and income for local residents. But there’s something else below the surface beside fish, something fraught with both peril and, locals hope, promise. Deep at the bottom of the lake, almost a thousand feet down, Kivu’s water is rich with naturally-occurring gas – including high levels of carbon dioxide and methane.

The gas is produced by unusual geological and biological processes. It’s a natural oddity, and it could be very dangerous, says Charles Nyirahuku, who manages energy projects for the Rwandan government.

“It builds up in the water,” Nyirahuku says, “and it can cause a sudden outburst or release of methane into the atmosphere.”

Lake Kivu seen from the town of Gisenyi. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

Lake Kivu seen from the town of Gisenyi. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

Geologic evidence shows that long ago, Lake Kivu had sudden releases of gas, or limnic eruptions, as they’re called. And similar recent events elsewhere show how bad an explosion like that could be today. In the 1980’s, CO2 bursts from two lakes in Cameroon killed nearly 2,000 people. Scientists believe Lake Kivu could be even more deadly, because they estimate it has about 1,000 times more gas than the Cameroonian lakes.

“We are told that this is one of the major environmental risks which we can face,” Nyirahuku says. And the only way to avert this kind of risk is to extract the methane.”

And that’s what his role in energy projects comes in. Nyirahuku is helping develop a project to capture the lake’s dissolved methane and use it to generate energy.

The beginnings of the project are rising on the edge of the lake, where workers chant in unison as they move metal beams next to a big blue barge, and welders fix rails that will guide the barge into the lake.

The barge will eventually float to a spot about eight miles away and become part of what’s known as the KivuWatt project. Equipment on the barge will suck the gas-rich water from the deepest part of the lake through what are called risers—“basically big straws” — stuck more than a thousand feet into the lake, says Bill Barry, a vice president at the New York-based company ContourGlobal, which is developing the unusual power plant.

Barry says the gasses will be separated from the water, and then from each other. The less-volatile CO2 will be pumped back below the surface, and the methane will be piped to shore, where it will be used to fuel a power plant.

If all goes according to plan, the process will help solve two big problems: the threat of an explosion, and Rwanda’s chronic energy shortage. Rwanda has very few energy resources of its own, which has helped make it one of the most expensive places in East Africa to power a home or business. Almost half of the electricity here is generated using diesel fuel, which has to be trucked into the landlocked country.

Backers hope the KivuWatt project will eventually double the amount of electricity generated in Rwanda and help wean the country off diesel energy.

But, there are risks.

For one thing, different layers of the lake have different concentrations of gas, and disturbing them too much could itself cause the very kind of explosion the project is meant to prevent. Experts have come up with guidelines for what they say will be safe gas extraction, and the Rwandan government has created a team to monitor the KivuWatt project.

Engineer Augusta Umutoni, who’s is in charge of the team, says she’s confident that there is no risk that the project might cause an explosion. But she says that isn’t the only risk.

A welder repairs the rails guiding the methane extraction barge into Lake Kivu at night. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

A welder repairs the rails guiding the methane extraction barge into Lake Kivu at night. (Photo: Anna Boiko-Weyrauch)

Extracting the gases could change the lake’s chemistry, Umutoni says. Among other things, there’s a risk that the surface water could become more acidic, or see a growth in algae or other organism, which could be bad news for Kivu’s fish and the human communities that depend on them.

That’s why the methane project will start small, with just a pilot phase expected to start producing energy later this year.

Back on the lake, the fishermen know that the power plant will change their lives, one way or another. Issa Ndungutse says he hopes it will be for the better. He says he hopes the methane project will reduce the risk of a gas explosion, and expects it to bring jobs and electricity to the area. Right now, he says, he doesn’t have power in his house.

Meanwhile the Rwandan government has much greater hopes for the unconventional project. If all the risks can be avoided, capturing Lake Kivu’s methane could be a big step in the country’s economic development.

Discussion

9 comments for “Rwanda Lake Poses Gas Danger, Energy Promise”

  • Shannon Fitzgerald

    Great reporting about Lake Kivu – I swam there last year – now slightly nervous about possible exposures – fascinating science.

  • Steve Stephenson

    Article ignores major issue: without an “explosion” the CO2 in the lake could be released by natural or man-made disturbances similar to Lake Nyos, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos. The resulting CO2 cloud would blanket the valley and suffocate millions of people and livestock. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Kivu.

    • Anna Boiko-Weyrauch

      Hello Steve,
      Right now, Augusta Umutoni in charge of monitoring Lake Kivu for Rwanda said that the lake is stable because the layers of water in the lake are of such different densities (like oil and water) that it would take quite a bit of additional pressure for the gas to escape the water pressing down on it.
      An earthquake by itself could not trigger an explosion, according to Lake Kivu expert, Martin Schmid at Eawag. He wrote me in an email, “A large landslide within the lake may do so, but only if the lake is much nearer saturation than today, the most possible trigger would be a magma eruption within the lake.”
      Mazukus relate to isolated releases of CO2, and are more commonly found in Congo than Rwanda.
      Thanks,
      Anna Boiko-Weyrauch

      • Anonymous

        Hello Steve and Anna,
        When Augusta Umutoni says the lake is relatively stable, and Martin Schmid that it takes a major event (major input of energy) to cause a limnic eruption, then it is true – for the time being.
        And by the way, Steve is right. The danger in case of an eruption has got nothing to do with an explosion. The gas that would emerge from Lake Kivu is not ignitable, but it is heavy, asphyxiating and toxic. If ever happening, such a cloud would be extremely deadly, given that its volume would suffice to cover the entire lake with a cloud more than 100 m (300 ft) thick.
        The main question is however what we do to the lake while extracting the gas. It is extremely important to maintain the known density structure in the lake so that also the future generations have the possibility to protect themselves against the ever accumulating gases in the lake. Harvesting the present stock of methane is not enough. Otherwise we would only have postponed but not hindered a future eruption. If gas extraction schemes are allowed to destroy the present density structure, it is most likely impossible for the future generations to protect themselves against the risks of a limnic eruption through commercial gas extraction.
        This very short description may open the eyes of the reader to the fact that there are very significant depths in this matter, not covered by Anna’s story. On the level it is at, however it provides a quite good coverage, but it tends to leave behind a little too easy feeling among the readers. There are still significant challenges to be solved.
        Finn Hirslund(one of the experts having drafted the rules for safe gas extraction from Lake Kivu also referred to as the Management Prescriptions)

  • hugo sarmento

    very good piece, scientifically correct. That is rare in our days…

  • Francisco Leotte

    I suppose the idea would be to release CO2 into the atmosphere rather than pumping it back into the lake after the extraction of the methane?! I know partial pressure of the dissolved gases would change and the lower layer would become slightly more stable yet trying to extract most of the CO2 and releasing it into the atmosphere would be by all means more advisable and constitute an effective solution to improve the lake’s stability. Isn’t this so?

    • Anna Boiko-Weyrauch

      Hello Francisco,
      Great question. Actually the CO2 WILL be pumped back into the lake (“redissolved” is the word they use) although at a shallower depth in order to maintain the density gradient.

      There has been a conversation among scientists about whether it is better to release the CO2 or re-dissolve it, and until recently it was considered necessary to vent the gas. However, a group of experts finalized guidelines in 2009 to ensure the safe removal of gas and continued lake stability. The 2009 Management Prescriptions say, “More recent and precise analysis of the density control and gas-lift requirements of the lake leads to a policy of more balanced and precise measures to control lake stability and production (page 17).”

      Redissolving the CO2 into Lake Kivu won’t pose a hazard, because CO2 contributes “only about 25% to total gas pressure,” according to Lake Kivu expert, Martin Schmid.

      Thanks,
      Anna Boiko-Weyrauch

  • Anonymous

    Again, possibly another big missed opportunity for the Congo. Did the Congolese government try to get involved (through the Office of the Governor of North-Kivu)? 

  • Alain Harelimana

    I am happy to see that Lake Kivu is of big interest to
    many people, and I appreciate precisions given by experts (Finn, Martin,..) on
    the scientific point of views on lake Kivu. I would like to ensure Shannon that
    Lake Kivu is at a very stable state now (it is only at 55% of saturation).
    Swimmers in Lake Kivu do not need to worry about gas explosion in Lake Kivu now
    (2012). If methane gas was not extracted until 2100, then swimmers would fear
    for an explosion!! However, we are working on preserving the safety of the lake by extracting methane gas (which
    is the trigger element of gas explosion in Lake Kivu because of its high
    partial pressure). On the other hand, our
    monitoring team is there to ensure that methane gas extraction will be done in
    a safe and sustainable way. The Management Prescriptions (MPs) are there to
    give guidance on good practices to ensure safety and sustainability of methane
    gas extraction and we are committed to find a way of enforcing them. On the
    other hand, the monitoring team is there to monitor if there are any impacts of
    methane gas extraction on the public and on the environment. From this year
    2012, we will be capable of monitoring the physico chemical properties, the
    biological states of the lake and we will have an inspection system on
    extraction facilities.  Concerning the
    cooperation with DRC, I wish to inform Genty that the Ministry of
    Infrastructure in Rwanda and the Ministry of Hydrocarbons in DRC are working
    hands in hands and plan to harmonize their views on the MPs. The 2 governments
    are aware that failure of one of the operators (on Rwanda’s site or on DR
    Congo’s site) will inevitably affect the common resource.