<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Campaign Returns Funds to Fugitive Rojas-Cardona&#8217;s Family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theworld.org/2012/02/obama-campaign-returns-funds-fugitive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/02/obama-campaign-returns-funds-fugitive/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-campaign-returns-funds-fugitive</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives for an American Audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camus Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/02/obama-campaign-returns-funds-fugitive/comment-page-1/#comment-23340</link>
		<dc:creator>Camus Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworld.org/?p=105801#comment-23340</guid>
		<description>If there was no wrongdoing, in accepting the money, which the writer of the original article for the NY Times admits on air,  and there was nothing wrong with the two brothers, who, have to be citizens or legal residents to donate themselves, engaging in support of a political candidate who represents their minority interests, as reflected in the sister-in-law&#039;s comment in the article (as Hispanics in America) why is this news?  Making the claim that &quot;there is some ulterior motive&quot;-- looking for a pardon that cannot be given by the re-elected president, because it is in fact legally impossible-- begs the question of the author, what is the secret motive? 

Did anyone even bother to read the articles in Spanish? As a bilingual American, when you read the articles in Spanish, you see that the entire basis of the story reads more like some sort of Hollywood movie plot rather than serious political discussion into politics that is more on par with the level of reporting done at Fox News and regrettably tabloids. 

Most importantly, why is there nothing being published about other people&#039;s contributions being returned, or on the Republican&#039;s side, what contributions are being returned and to whom? As a minority, and American citizen, race in this context as well as automatically citing sources that state that someone is a &quot;gangster&quot; or &quot;drug lord&quot; seem to fall much too easily to the stereotype that minorities, particularly Hispanics and African American are all &quot;gangsters&quot; and &quot;drug lords.&quot; 

I have lost respect for the NYTimes as well as most major news outlets for citing the original article as not only a source of information but being so willing to publish it as &quot;news.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was no wrongdoing, in accepting the money, which the writer of the original article for the NY Times admits on air,  and there was nothing wrong with the two brothers, who, have to be citizens or legal residents to donate themselves, engaging in support of a political candidate who represents their minority interests, as reflected in the sister-in-law&#8217;s comment in the article (as Hispanics in America) why is this news?  Making the claim that &#8220;there is some ulterior motive&#8221;&#8211; looking for a pardon that cannot be given by the re-elected president, because it is in fact legally impossible&#8211; begs the question of the author, what is the secret motive? </p>
<p>Did anyone even bother to read the articles in Spanish? As a bilingual American, when you read the articles in Spanish, you see that the entire basis of the story reads more like some sort of Hollywood movie plot rather than serious political discussion into politics that is more on par with the level of reporting done at Fox News and regrettably tabloids. </p>
<p>Most importantly, why is there nothing being published about other people&#8217;s contributions being returned, or on the Republican&#8217;s side, what contributions are being returned and to whom? As a minority, and American citizen, race in this context as well as automatically citing sources that state that someone is a &#8220;gangster&#8221; or &#8220;drug lord&#8221; seem to fall much too easily to the stereotype that minorities, particularly Hispanics and African American are all &#8220;gangsters&#8221; and &#8220;drug lords.&#8221; </p>
<p>I have lost respect for the NYTimes as well as most major news outlets for citing the original article as not only a source of information but being so willing to publish it as &#8220;news.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>