Fukushima’s Hot Zone Cleanup: A Journey Into Uncharted Territory

Reporter Sam Eaton wearing full protective gear. (Photo: Sam Eaton)

Reporter Sam Eaton wearing full protective gear, inside the 12 mile exclusion zone around the Fukushima reactor. (Photo: Sam Eaton)

A year after a tsunami triggered a triple meltdown at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant, the cleanup of the contaminated area around the plant has just begun.

And as Sam Eaton reports from the hot zone, no one knows if it will ever be finished, because no one’s ever tried anything like it.


It‘s the moment when the alarms on the Geiger counters all start going off at once that it sinks in. The bus I’m on is taking me inside the 12 mile ring around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant that just about everyone else has been evacuated from. Up the coast, the earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011 destroyed entire towns and left mountains of wreckage. But here, in the fallout zone of the tsunami-caused triple nuclear meltdown, the devastation is invisible.

Outside the windows of our bus, we pass abandoned fields, and towns that used to be crowded with people but are now empty except for left-behind animals. Inside, we sit completely covered in Tyvek suits, nothing exposed.

The plume of radioactive fallout from the three crippled reactors contaminated an area the size of New Jersey. Now I’ve come to see firsthand how the cleanup is progressing in some of the most contaminated areas.

It’s still early. The first phase of the cleanup only began in January, nine months after the tsunami when the government finally declared the plant stable. But one thing is already certain—the cleanup is venturing into almost completely uncharted territory. No one has any idea whether it will succeed.

Less than a mile from the plant, government contractors at one of 19 model cleanup sites shovel dirt into thick plastic bags after tearing up the driveway to an abandoned house. Across the road, tractors scrape soil from a contaminated rice field. But the most dangerous radiation levels at this site are in a tall stand of cedars. Standing amid the trees looking at the forest and rivers beyond, you get a sense how difficult it is to clean up this kind of landscape.

Cleanup workers have no experience with radiation

And that’s the crux of the challenge. The Japanese government says it wants to make the entire fallout area safe to live in again, all 8,000 square miles of it. But no one’s ever really tried something like this before. Even the contractors hired by the government have no experience with radiation cleanup. So the contractors and scientists are using sites like this one to try to see what works and what doesn’t.

They’re digging up soil, spraying chemical fixation agents, even blasting iron shot over paved surfaces. But the results so far have been uneven at best. In this stand of cedars, for instance, workers have removed branches, leaf debris, even some of the topsoil, exposing the tree’s roots, but now they may also have to remove the trees themselves, because radiation levels are still more than 600 times the government’s ultimate goal.

Shinichi Nakayama, a nuclear engineer with the Japan Atomic Energy Agency who’s overseeing this initial phase of the cleanup, says they’re finding that forests are the most challenging areas. That’s a problem, because Nakayama says 70 percent of the contaminated land consists of forested hills and mountains. And he says he doesn’t know if it’s even possible to clean up this kind of terrain.

But “no” is not an answer local officials are willing to accept.

The regional government in Fukushima City has set a cleanup target of one millisievert of radiation exposure per year, the low end of an internationally accepted range of safety. And Katsumasa Suzuk, who heads the government’s decontamination division, says he hopes the model cleanup projects will meet that target. He says that would pave the way for the larger decontamination effort and ultimately make it safe for the 80,000 evacuees to go home.


What to do with all the waste?

But even if the effort succeeds, it raises another problem: what to do with all the waste?

For now, bags of contaminated soil are being temporarily stored in makeshift facilities like the lined pit that now occupies a former sports field at an abandoned school. Overall, the cleanup is expected to generate at least three and a half billion cubic feet of radioactive waste—enough to fill the Dallas Cowboys stadium, the world’s largest, 34 times. The government still doesn’t know where all that waste will go.

And then there’s this question: once the cleanup is finally complete, what kind of place will the evacuees be going back to?

Shinichi Nakayama, the official overseeing the initial decontamination, says there are limits to how much cleaning the natural environment can take. That’s one of the biggest dilemmas here. The more radioactive material you remove to make the area safe for humans, the more damage you’re doing to the land, creating a whole new set of environmental problems like erosion, decreased soil fertility, and potentially throwing off the entire balance of the local ecosystem.

Kiyomi Yokota says he thinks it’s an impossible undertaking. Yokota is an environmentalist from Fukushima whom I met in Koriyama City, 37 miles west of the nuclear plant.

Yokota says if all the trees are removed, the still-radioactive soils would erode into the rivers or the fields, where the farmers grow their food, recontaminating areas even after they’ve been cleaned.

Instead of trying to clean up, create a “no-go” zone?

He says instead the government should do what the Soviet Union did after the Chernobyl disaster—create a permanent “no go” zone for the most contaminated areas, and then use some of the cleanup funds to help people relocate, especially those with small children, like himself.

These days Yokota is doing independent radiation testing for a Japanese television company, and he says he’s finding hotspots in places the government has declared safe, some with readings close to what I found inside the evacuation zone.

Yokota says he no longer lets his three-year-old daughter play outside. And he’s careful about the food they eat. He’d like to leave, he says, but he doesn’t have the means.

And even if the government did help people like Yokota relocate, Japan, unlike the Soviet Union, is already a very crowded country. Today, one year after the disaster, most of the evacuees live in compact, temporary housing. And there are very few places they could go to recreate the coastal farms many of them left behind.

Even if government gives the OK to return, farmers worry about public trust

I met a group of evacuated dairy farmers at a community center in Minamisoma, just north of the evacuation zone. They showed me pictures they took the first time they were allowed to go back to their farms. Nearly every one of their cows had died. One photograph shows a thick wooden beam that’s been chewed through by a starving animal.

Unlike Kiyomi Yokota, 62 year-old Ise Hangui says he wants to return to his hometown for good. He wonders, though—even if the government declares his farm safe, will consumers ever trust his milk again?

And, he asks, why should they? He and all the other farmers I talked to say they don’t trust the government anymore either.

Shinji Watanabe, who’s 53, says he still can’t decide whether or not he’ll return to his farm, even if he’s allowed to, because he can’t get enough information from the government to know whether or not it’s safe. He says it would be one thing for him and his wife to return, since they’ve already lived much of their lives. But his dreams of working with his son, and eventually his grandchildren, are gone. And he can’t imagine growing old without them.

And that raises yet another dilemma in the legacy of Fukushima. Even if the government spends tens, even hundreds of billions of dollars cleaning up the contaminated zone, no one knows if residents like Watanabe even want to go home.

Visualize tweets for this story: Click on the image below to see tweets

spot-fukushima


Discussion

2 comments for “Fukushima’s Hot Zone Cleanup: A Journey Into Uncharted Territory”

  • ccrew

    First, let me compliment you on researching and writing this story.  This story is the most important one coming out of the Fukushima disaster.  It’s even the most important story about energy choices I’ve ever seen.  I can’t believe no one else has commented.

    While we’re deciding how to generate the energy we need in the future, let’s look at the consequences each brings.  Are we really willing to have “no go’ zones speckle the countryside in order to use nuclear energy?  Who gets to decide if we are?  Right now it is the  nuclear industry deciding this for us. 

    But the industry will not become a refugee from family owned lands and the inheritance that would have been passed on to descendants.  In the name of common decency, it is those who will suffer the consequences of these choices who should be involved in making the decisions.

    On a planet of increasing population pressures, where global warming will be shrinking habitable land as it’s covered by water, we can’t afford to lose more because areas are permanently contaminated by radiation.  Don’t look to technology to fix this; instead, wait to use nuclear energy until the technology has already been invented.  Imaging that a technology will be developed someday is magical thinking and shouldn’t be used to make practical decisions.

    Thank you for allowing me to express these concerns.

    Cynthia Weehler

    Energía
    Mía

    San Antonio, TX

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.caligari Jeff Caligari

    People who sold them the technology and anyone involved in that technology should ultimately sit to work out how to safely store/remove/dispose of toxic waste or even stop producing it but what I will probably be looking up next is how uranium is radioactive to begin with and its in the ground so what if it goes back or doesn’t it work like that? Natural uranium and other elements are radioactive, people didn’t make them this way but brought them in a concentrated area where they can be big problems.