Alex Gallafent

Alex Gallafent

Alex Gallafent is the New York-based correspondent for The World. His reporting has taken him to Swaziland, Turkey, Chile, and India, among other places.

  • |
  • ALL POSTS

The Nazi ‘Titanic’

A scene from the Nazi propaganda film "Titanic".

A scene from the Nazi propaganda film "Titanic".

Watch a portion of Nazi propaganda film “Titanic”.

This weekend will mark 100 years since the sinking of the Titanic. There are countless events marking the anniversary, including an auction of artifacts from the ocean liner, a cruise to the ship’s final resting place in the north Atlantic, and the re-release in 3D of James Cameron’s 1997 blockbuster.

But there’s another Titanic movie that’s getting some renewed attention too. Like Cameron’s movie, this one’s simply titled “Titanic”. It features a love story and the sinking of the unsinkable ship. But there the similarities end.

This “Titanic” was a piece of Nazi propaganda, commissioned by Joseph Goebbels.

In this version of the story the ship sank as a result of British greed. The film opens in the London Stock Exchange, where the share price of Titanic’s parent company, White Star Line, is plunging. It’s no accident: the chairman of White Star, Bruce Ismay, is working to make it happen.

“And the way he’s going to do that is to suggest that the company is in trouble because of the huge expenses in building the Titanic,” said Randall Bytwerk, an expert in Nazi propaganda at Calvin College.

“That’ll drive shares down. Then when the ship has set sail he’ll announce that it’s setting a world’s record pace, and that’ll drive shares up and supposedly he’ll make his fortune.”

Ismay was a real man, and he was widely criticized after Titanic’s sinking for taking one of the few seats available on a lifeboat. But in the Nazi’s telling he’s simply an evil British plutocrat scheming to profit off the backs of everyone else.

During the film, Ismay urges the ship’s Captain Smith to go faster and faster, offering him a thousand dollars for each hour the ship arrives ahead of schedule.

Of course there’s also a voice of reason, someone pressing Captain Smith to follow a safer course. That’s a fictional first officer, a German by the name of Petersen who embodies all the qualities a Nazi member of the audience might find admirable.

Ian Garden, author of The Third Reich’s Celluloid War, described him as “the archetypal officer who keeps on warning the captain ‘you’re going too fast, we’ve not got enough life boats, we’re going to hit an iceberg’. And they refuse to listen to him.”

“You’d expect him to go down with the ship,” said Randall Bytwerk, “and he almost does, but he’s saved by doing a good deed. As he’s prowling around the sinking ship he hears a small child crying who’s been left by its plutocratic mother to die to save her own skin. He rescues the young girl, dives into the water, carries her to a waiting lifeboat–where, by the way his love interest is waiting–and both he and the young girl are saved. So the hero is a German.”

“Titanic” was an incredibly expensive film for its time: the special effects were state-of-the-art. It took a long time to make. Too long, as it turned out.

Work on the film began in 1940 when Germany’s military was conquering all. But by the time the film was ready for its premiere screening in Berlin, things weren’t going so well and Joseph Goebbels had second thoughts.

Randall Bytwerk said that the Nazi propaganda minister realized that scenes of panic and mass death wouldn’t play well to German audiences in the spring of 1943.

“British and American bombers [were] coming over day and night, the Stalingrad defeat [was] clear to everybody. So the film just [didn’t] look propagandistically good,” he said.

The Nazi’s “Titanic” was a piece of propaganda based on a tragedy, but the film seemed only to beget further tragedies.

Look what happened to the director, Herbert Selpin, said Ian Garden. “He was overheard one day complaining one day about the war getting in the way of the making of his film.”

Selpin’s complaints got back to Goebbels, who demanded an apology. “But Selpin was a very stubborn man, he refused to apologize,” said Garden. “He was put into a prison cell and the next day he was found hanged dead from his braces in that cell.”

Was it suicide, was it murder? Most think the latter. In any case, that was a single man. What happened later couldn’t be written, said Garden.

“The main tragedy is that the ship that they used to film the outside scenes on was a ship called the Cap Arcona. That ship, at the end of the war, was sunk by mistake by the Allies as it was carrying–of all people–5000 concentration camp prisoners. And they were all killed.”

Hitler had met his end days earlier; the remaining Nazi leaders were trying to cover up their crimes by removing people left in the camps. Some also think the Nazis disguised the ship as a troop carrier, almost inviting an attack.

“So there were far more people killed on that ship than were actually killed on the real Titanic. It’s a terribly sad story.”



Discussion

4 comments for “The Nazi ‘Titanic’”

  • aknman49

    The “Titanic” WAS setting a break-neck pace and her speed, despite several warnings about the considerable presence of ice, has been a puzzlement to mariners over the ages.   Nazis may have thought blaming unblanched western capitalism was a good propaganda tool for a storyline but the real reason may have been even more compelling — and embarrassing.

    A British coal mine workers strike may have been the reason.

    Not wanting a public-relations disaster stemming from lack of fuel for the voyage, the White Star Line hastily transferred stocks of coal from other ships, causing a case of spontaneous combustion in one or two of the “Titanic”s lower holds which burned unchecked the entire voyage.

    CBC television (Canada) recently aired a compelling segment on this theory on their flagship news program “The National” last week that’s worth viewing, if you’re interested:

    http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/TV_Shows/The_National/1233408557/ID=2220734069 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=735826132 Yoram Mlodik

      URBAN MYTH! “Titanic” was going regular speed for that time, most ships crossed the oceans at 20+ knots in the 1910s. Besides, “Titanic” had a top speed of 23 knots, as opposed to the “Lusitania,” which averaged 26 knots and the “Mauretania,” which could race at over 27 knots. “Titanic” was never the fastest ship and was never intended to break speed record. Her arriving one day early at the end of the 7 day trip would be  a non-event, considering that the Cunard rivals could travel from contingent to continent within 5-6 days.

  • Jake9011

    I would not trust any article that cites Randall Bytwerk. Simply not trustworthy.

  • saltyseadude

    The bombing of the Cap Arcona and the death of the concentration camp survivors she carried was a tragedy. Sad that this event took place at all. Sadder still that NPR/PRI did not tell the whole story.
    With Hitler already dead and the war only days away from ending, why did the British Fighter Command think it necessary to bomb what it thought was a ship full of German refugees fleeing the butchery of the Red Army? After sinking the ship the British planes strafed the survivors in the water and yet this article mentions none of this information nor does it mention the three other refugee ships sunk (Wilhelm Gustloff, General Steubon, Goya) by Soviet subs with enormous loss of life at around the same time. Are German civilian dead not worth acknowledging or remembering? Shouldn’t the shooting survivors in the water be considered a war crime? Avoiding the full telling of history is a disservice to NPR listeners and I am disturbed at this obvious deliberate omission.