Patrick Cox

Patrick Cox

Patrick Cox runs The World's language desk. He reports and edits stories about the globalization of English, the bilingual brain, translation technology and more. He also hosts The World's podcast on language, The World in Words.

Beyond Class Part I: A Life’s Path Determined at Age Eleven

David Ward (Photo: Patrick Cox)

David Ward (Photo: Patrick Cox)

Lesley Ebbetts and David Ward were born in 1946 within a few days of each other and a few miles of each other, in similar social circumstances.

“I was the eldest of two daughters so I was their first born,” Ebbetts said. “They’d waited a long time for me because of the war.”

Ebbetts’ family was working class. Both her parents left school at fifteen, as soon as they could get factory jobs.

David Ward’s family background was also humble.

“My dad left at thirteen, and missed a lot of school because he didn’t have shoes because it was the Depression,” Ward said. “His dad was a piano tuner, and people were burning their pianos during the Depression, not hiring people to tune them.”

Ward and Ebbetts are both participants in a public health study of more than 5,000 Britons, all born in that same week in 1946.

They have much in common. They went to state-run elementary schools in or near London.

Ebbetts recalls those early years at school fondly.

“I was quite happy there. Very happy there,” she said. “I became quite good at reading because I remember instructing the others in groups. But it all came crashing round the ears at eleven.”

Pass or Fail

What came crashing round the ears was an exam, an exam that had recently been introduced by the British government.

It was called the Eleven Plus. (See a sample of the Eleven Plus Exam from the 1950s.)

If you passed it, you went to one type of school. If you failed, you went to another.

“The Eleven Plus came along, and it’s been the bane of my life,” Ebbetts said.

David Ward remembers the day he took the Eleven Plus exam.

“Looking back now it was certainly the biggest single determinant of my future,” he said.

He knew at the time that if he passed it, he’d be among the chosen few, plucked from the working classes to be enrolled in an elite government-run school—and likely college after that.

Ward says that’s what he was thinking about as he walked into a grand, unfamiliar building on the morning of the exam

“It’s a great classical fronted place with big steps and a colonnaded portico,” he recalled. “And there’s you in your eleven-year-old little shorts and funny shoes and shirt going in to take this exam at this place. And it was daunting. You knew that a lot was to happen on this day, and that a lot hung on what happened on that day.”

Britain’s Grammar Schools

David Ward, age 1, with his mother and sister in Clacton-on-Sea, England. (Photo courtesy of David Ward)

David Ward, age 1, with his mother and sister in Clacton-on-Sea, England. (Photo courtesy of David Ward)

Ward and three others in his class of sixty passed the exam. They had earned themselves places in what in Britain are called grammar schools.

At his new school, Ward was exposed to many new things and new people, including a teacher who drove a flashy car and lived in central London.

“We were going to see a play in Greek at a place near him so he invited us for ‘supper’,” Ward said. “And I didn’t know what ‘supper’ was. So we all turned up…and he was playing Handel sonatas on his stereo. And this supper included olives, which I’d never seen before. And so you were in this amazingly sophisticated atmosphere. And he gave me a glimpse of another world.”

Ward liked what he saw. He went to college, and then became a reporter. That turned into a career at the respected national paper, The Guardian.

A generation before, that path might not have been open to a working class kid. But now, the route from humble beginnings through the Eleven Plus, grammar school and on to college was laid out.

Many people took it. Among the most prominent: five British Prime Ministers, including Margaret Thatcher.

The Majority that Failed

For all the benefits of the few who passed the Eleven Plus, what about the others, the majority who failed?

They were sent to schools called Secondary Moderns. The British government tried to explain its new two-tiered school system in public service announcements:

“Well now Janet, you’ve come to the secondary school. Secondary modern school, you know that is what it is called don’t you?”

“Yes, we were rather sorry Janet failed the Eleven Plus.”

“Well, I hardly think that failed is the right word, Mrs. Kitchen. She would have failed the test had she been selected for the wrong school. And therefore if she’s been selected for the right school, then she’s really passed the test.”

Most parents didn’t buy that argument.

Secondary moderns quickly became viewed as places where ungifted children ended up, where they were housed until they were old enough to go to work.

That’s how Lesley Ebbetts saw it.

“We weren’t really educated to become anything more, whereas I think at grammar school you really were,” she said.

Ebbetts didn’t go onto university. Virtually no-one did from her school. But she did become successful. She got a foot in the fashion industry, and started writing articles for the popular press, and doing spots on the radio.

She’d visit boutiques frequented by celebrities.

Fashionable London, 1969. (Photo: Wiki Commons)

Fashionable London, 1969. (Photo: Wiki Commons)

“I found out where [Mick] Jagger was getting his boots or whatever it might be,” she said. Then she would talk about it on the radio.

“Everybody lapped it up,” she said.

Ebbetts got a job on a magazine called Rave, moved to fashionable Chelsea and bought an Orange Mini.

“It was two fingers to those who called me a failure at eleven,” she said.

“Two fingers” is the British version of the middle finger.

And yet, Ebbetts couldn’t shake the feeling that she’d been denied an education, and a certain type of life. She was making money, but in Britain, class is about more than money.

Ebbetts’ choice of profession wasn’t held in especially high esteem.

Had she passed the Eleven Plus, and gone on to grammar school and college, she thinks she would have risen to a more respectable career.

The Long Tail of the Eleven Plus

Lesley Ebbetts (Photo: Patrick Cox)

Lesley Ebbetts (Photo: Patrick Cox)

Even now, failing the Eleven Plus plagues Lesley Ebbetts.

“If one suffers a major rejection or a major bereavement, I’m back with it again,” she said. “I’m dealing with how to deal with failure again, with another therapist.

In the 1970s, long after Lesley Ebbetts and David Ward had left school, Britain stopped requiring students to take the Eleven Plus exam, and got rid of most grammar schools.

The two-tiered school had become unpopular.

The majority of kids were failing their exams and going to secondary modern schools. And many parents thought the system was unfair.

Compounding this was research showing that the Eleven Plus exam was culturally biased in favor of the middle and upper classes. The government responded to the public outcry and made the Eleven Plus optional.

But just when grammar schools were being phased out, social mobility began declining.

Social Mobility

Was it the Eleven Plus exam and grammar schools that made the difference?

Oxford University sociologist Adam Swift has studied this issue. He says that Britain was undoubtedly more socially mobile in the days of grammar schools.

“It is true that if you went to a grammar school, you’re certainly likely to have done better than to a secondary modern,” Swift said.

But he says when it comes to Britain’s poorest children, only a tiny fraction passed the Eleven Plus and went to grammar schools.

And even for those who did and climbed up the socio-economic ladder, they fell short of the very top.

“So there was no real kind of boost to mobility up into the top quarter although it did help you get into the top half a little bit,” he said.

But this is not the prevailing view among a new generation of politicians. Many now believe that the Eleven Plus and grammar schools were the key to Britain’s golden age of social mobility.

They believe that the smart working class kids of today no longer have a pathway to success. And so, the two-tiered system is gradually coming back.

Britain’s Conservative-led government has made it easier for Britain’s few remaining grammar schools to expand.

The Return of Grammar Schools?

In April 2012, the first grammar school campus to open in decades was approved.

That’s not something that Lesley Ebbetts welcomes. She says she’d hate to see the old system come back with many poorer kids denied a good education.

Fifty-five years after she failed the Eleven Plus, Ebbetts says she’s grateful only that she and a handful of others transcended that failure.

“So we made it in the end—some of us—but I think that an awful lot were completely wasted,” she said.

Surprisingly perhaps, David Ward feels the same way.

He knows he was one of the few beneficiaries of the system. But he doesn’t think it really worked.

Broadly speaking, he says, the rich have stayed rich and the poor have stayed poor, despite a school exam that was designed to change that.

“The whole history of this thing seems to me to prove that that gap never narrows, that every step that you make to improve the lot of the poor or the people who’ve missed out on education, nothing much has changed. Which is a bit chilling to think of really, after all that time,” Ward said.



Beyond Class: Societies in Flux


Part I: A Life’s Path Determined at Age Eleven
Part II: Tahrir Square: Revolution – the Struggle and Sacrifice for Middle Class
Part III: Class in the Shadow of Ukraine’s Orange Revolution
Part IV: India: Searching for Your Caste Online
Part V: Indians in America: Caste Adrift
Part VI: Class in Rural China: What Has Changed Since Mao Zedong Visited
Part VII: Britain’s Long Love Affair with Class, and Its Brief Fling with Classlessness
Full Series: Beyond Class

Discussion

10 comments for “Beyond Class Part I: A Life’s Path Determined at Age Eleven”

  • valvox

     

     When I was eleven I
    burst into tears when I heard the news from my mother that I had failed the
    eleven-plus exam. My hopes and dreams of becoming a dentist or astronomer or
    some other notable profession were over. I was now classed among those who
    would, ironically, be known as ‘the back bone of Britain’, the working class- laborers,
    factory workers, bus drivers, road sweepers, garbage men and the like. I was
    sent unceremoniously to a secondary school where all I learned was the art of
    survival.

    I left this school at fifteen, (then, the school leaving
    age) and began work as an apprentice at a photographic studio. Thanks to a
    great boss and mentor I was soon photographing, weddings, portraits and commercial
    items for advertising layouts.

     Free- lancing, I got
    one of my pictures published on the front cover of a national magazine before I
    reached 16.

    By the time I was 17, I had an impressive portfolio and yet
    when I went for another job in the south of England, the interviewer, instead
    of glancing through my album of impressive portraits, commercial shots and
    published works, asked me where I was born, what my father did for a living and
    if my mother was a housewife or was employed? This was Britain in the 1950’s

    Disgusted with the social class system I left for the new world
    at 19 where I found I would be judged by my abilities and not by my family
    background or the way I spoke.

    Now an American and in my seventies, my achievements are
    numerous -public speaker, broadcaster, producer, designer, author of several
    books including a best seller.

    Although the eleven –plus has long gone, Britain will forever
    be a class conscious society.  This was
    brought home to me when I returned to Britain during the 80’s after my first
    book was published by Heinemann’s. I was asked to be the presented on a program
    based on my book. During a break on the set, the director, who knew I did not
    have a university education, asked me in earnest, “Did you really write this
    book or was it ghost written.”

     

    Sincerely

    Valentine Vox

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x01oAJO-I-4

  • Joanna Vickery-Allen

    I was another story.   I passed the exam but as I was living with my father, his common law wife and her 3 children I wasn’t allowed to go to grammar school because it would ‘show up’ her children because they didn’t pass.   My stepmother advised the school it was because she was pregnant, could ill afford the uniform and wanted all ‘her’ children together.   I ‘left’ school at 15 and went to London where I managed to climb the ladder that led to my realization of a good life in America.   There were few opportunities for ones such as me and I am grateful for all the encouragement I got from the teachers in secondary school.   Thanks to them the dire predictions of my dismal future have failed to come to fruition.   Although I have not achieved the fame of Ms. Fox I am happily facing my seventies and writing a book too – thanks to Erma Bombeck who was the first writer to encourage me and to Lennon/McCartney for their song “When I’m 64″
    Well done Ms. Fox, I hope to meet you sometime.

  • Hewmum

    In 1961, my last year in the A stream of a suburban London junior school, there was a flu epidemic.  There was also a shortage of teachers and so I was asked to go and babysit one of the younger B stream classes.  One of the younger children remarked that I would soon be going to the local secondary modern school and I replied in horror “No, no I’m going to the Grammar School”.  However, this was a formative experience for me as I suddenly realized that these children had been labeled as failures by the age of 8 and that such labeling  couldn’t be right.  I found out years later that only 5 – 10% of us in my area passed the 11+.  In the A stream we were groomed for the test.  I remember much of that education as boring.  I certainly hope the 11+ is never reinstated.

  • SandyH58

    I went to a private school but did not pass the 11 plus exam. I desperately wanted to study Latin but was told I couldn’t and that there was no point anyway because I wouldn’t be going to university. I still shudder and prickle when I think about this, in spite of a graduate degree, three fluent languages plus two serviceable ones and two clinical texts to my name. Dreadful exam. Hurtful system at the time. Lots of money spent trying to undo the damage.

    Sandy Hirsch

  • donna izzi

    Hello from the” great U.S.A”. Eleven Plus reminds me of the way the children,mine included,were treated in the 1990′s, at the elementary school they attended.Disregard,comments by teachers that college was not really in their future..So many children from this school are now working menial jobs such as Wal Mart,Dollar Tree and Family Dollar,right in the same neighborhood. Ironically,upscale neighborhoods all of a mile away…college careers..I got divorced and moved out when my sons were in High School. They fared better..but,the comments by teachers have left a mark  on my younger son, who is almost 28…He still can recall comments made by so called educators..I wish I knew this back in the day.He teaches music,in two bands and received the Louis Armstrong Award in High School.This “splitting up” I wonder if it still exists??HEARTBREAKING Donna Izzi Rhode Island

  • davenkathryn

    I have lived in the US (San Diego) since 1981 but was born
    in the UK. I went through the English education system of the 1950’s – 1970’s
    and failed my 11+ in 1962. Like most children in my primary school at that age,
    we were herded off to the local ‘Victorian’ secondary modern schools, one for
    the boys and one for the girls.

    I remember on entering the secondary modern school at 11
    there was further education screening applied as they placed each child in
    either the “A” or “B” class, presumably based on your 11+ results. I remember
    primary school friends feeling quite distressed at ending up in the “B” class
    as they became further stigmatized.  

    I did end up in the “A” class and really excelled in
    mathematics. However, the resources did not exist at the school to go further
    with this as you had to leave school at 16 and there was certainly no transfer
    mechanism to the local Grammar school once you ended up at the secondary
    modern. No matter what educational aptitude you showed after age 11 you were
    trapped for 5 years until you could leave school. My parents did not have the financial
    resources to send me to public school for a private education that would at
    least come close to a Grammar School education.

    At 16, a career’s officer visited the school to offer ‘advice’
    to the kids about to leave. It was really down to whether you wanted an indoor
    job or outdoor job. Even though at 16 you took GCSE’s which at the Grade 1
    level were the secondary modern equivalent to the Grammar school GCE  “O” level , the stepping stone to continuing
    your education to “A” levels , a degree and career and social mobility.

    Interestingly, the secondary modern career advice didn’t
    even contemplate the possibility of continuing your education at the local
    technical college to study for your “A” levels and continue to an HND, the
    equivalent of a degree that was offered by technical colleges.   

    Through sheer luck, my mathematics teacher at the secondary
    modern and my mentor encouraged me to go to the local technical college to take
    “A” levels rather than settle for an indoor job or outdoor job, which might
    have been the case at 16. In 1967 they just started offering computational
    mathematics at “A” level and it was my first exposure to computers and computer
    programming.   I took to it immediately and went on to a
    degree in Maths, Stats and Computing and then studied for an MSc in Operational
    Research.

    Since moving to the US (San Diego) with my American wife in
    1981 I have had a successful career in the computer software industry from
    technical to sales management. The US has provided me tremendous opportunities
    for personal growth and a social (upward) mobility that I believe would have
    been far more difficult to attain had I remained in the UK.

    I look back at my life and opportunities along the way and
    often wonder where I would be now if it hadn’t been for the encouragement of
    the mathematics teacher at the secondary modern who saw beyond the failings of
    the system and who took it upon himself to encourage me to continue with my
    education. There were no checks and balances and mechanisms in place back then
    to escape ‘your lot’ and better yourself along the way, once you ended up in a
    secondary modern.
    This is where the educational
    system failed me (& others) back then so anything remotely resembling this
    structure moving forward, I believe is doomed to failure.

  • Ilyamarina

    1946– what week?  I have a good friend born in Guildford in 1946, but don’t know if he was born the week you are looking at– probably not given the odds, but it would be interesting, none the less.

  • jmkusa

    Gosh, I vividly remember the discussions of the 11+..which I luckily avoided taking as my RAF father managed to scrape up enough to send me to private school.  My younger siblings took it in case he ran out of money, passed it and eventually got scholarships to university.  But in the 50′s if you could not pass Latin A level that was it for UK university entrance and me…..I enrolled in a technical college and eventually studied at the Sorbonne, emigrating to the US in 1960 where I really loved the fact that if you were interested, ambitious or had a good idea, someone would give you a chance to “go for it”!  I am now in my mid seventies and still working.
    Just for fun, I copied the sample exam in the article, and will take it together with my 12 year old granddaughter just to see how we both make out!  She would actually like to go to my old school in England for an exchange year, so perhaps this exercise would be good training.

    The biggest complaint I hear from teachers in the US is that they have to teach to all abilities, not to mention language barriers, in the classroom (to a certain age) which must be very challenging and tough on everyone-I imagine this is true of Britain today also.  So how does an education system handle the fact that different children bloom at different times and not all are as talented as some?…Yes, all should have a fair shot at the best education they can get as the tests in life itself will separate the sheep from the goats.

    Jenny K. 

  • Palmanova

    I am a twin. We were presented for the 11+ exam in 1960. I passed; my sister “failed.” Your report does not mention the crop of comprehensive schools that took over the nation at the time. These schools became the answer to the 11+ pass/fail dilemma. They had, perhaps, six entry levels at the 11 yr.old level. They catered to 30-35 children in each classroom and those who had ” failed” the exam were able to move up (or down) in the system. I stayed at the top and was proffered all the rights of passage for an academic education and university career. My twin rose up through the lowly ranks and opted for a medical career as a registered nurse.
    The system worked for us and my fellow students. We had Fine Arts and PE with a mix of pupils from all classes and were richer for it.

    Perhaps we should go back to those good old days.

  • squirreler

    It sounds so crazy when you hear about this test from decades ago.  Unfortunately the same type of thing happens all the time here in the USA now, just without any formal procedure.  As someone who moved around a lot (10 schools in 3 states to graduate High School), I saw huge differences in the quality of offerings at schools, mainly along socioeconomic lines.   At one public school I attended all 6th grade students took 3 foreign languages, one being Latin.  At other elementary or middle schools they had no foreign language, or maybe 1 for only 1 hour a week.  At some schools it was typical for students to have taken Algebra in 8th grade or earlier, while at other schools algebra wasn’t available to students until 9th grade.  Some high schools offered physics, philosophy, and two years of calculus, while others did not.  Some schools offered tons of ‘Honors’ classes, while other offered none or only a couple.   The schools in richer neighborhoods almost without fail had better classes, better labs, better field trips and projects, and expected more of the kids.  The middle school a friend of mine attended was in a neighborhood with two very different groups of kids- some of the richest and some of the poorest in the city went there.  My friend, a rich kid with a Latino last name, was put into the most basic, non-honors classes at the school, with no questions or discussion with him or his parents, while his friends from elementary school with non-Latino last names were put into the honors classes, also with no questions or discussion with the students or parents.  His parents, both college educated, questioned his classes, and he was switched.  But at that school a few years ago, the honors classes were still mostly white and Asian students, while the basic classes were mostly black or Latino students.  I also know from experience in two of the top undergraduate and graduate programs in the country, that mainly only rich students get there.  At least with the Eleven Plus they were upfront with what was going on, and had a consistent method to the madness.