Norway’s Example of Oil and Gas Boom Done Right

Stavanger has grown wealthy on the proceeds of the oil industry and is now one of the most expensive cities in the world. (Photo: Laura Lynch)

Stavanger has grown wealthy on the proceeds of the oil industry and is now one of the most expensive cities in the world. (Photo: Laura Lynch)

In the pretty harbor city of Stavanger, on Norway’s North sea coast, the seagulls are screeching high above the town square adjacent to a sparkling blue fjord. Here, it’s easy to get a glimpse of the country’s hardscrabble economic past and its booming present day spectacular wealth.

This harbor used to be lined with herring canneries, dozens of them. Piers Croker, the curator of the Norway Canning Museum, says it was the lifeblood of Stavanger.

“Let’s put it like this,” he says. “Fifty percent of the working population was employed in the canneries; another 15 percent in the supply industries. And there was a newspaper headline in the 1920s ‘The City that Stands on One Leg’ and that leg was canning.”

Croker shows an old canning machine and says one employee set a record when he managed to seal a thousand cans a day. That man’s grandson still lives in the town. But the canneries were all gone by the early 1980s.

Almost everyone now works in the offshore oil industry that transformed the town. Croker says the change was stunning.


“There was a guy who had been in the in canning industry for 30 years. And his wages, when he retired from the canning industry, were less than his 18-year-old daughter [was making] beginning in the oil industry.”

The sleepy fishing town now boasts high-end fashion shops. The harbor is dotted with cranes and offshore oil platforms either in for maintenance or ready to float out to the North Sea drilling sites. It is evidence of good times. But it is also proof that Norway has avoided the so-called “Dutch disease.” Everywhere else in the world a boom in oil has led to a decline and sometimes devastation of other parts of the economy.

Norway’s success, some say, is largely down to one man. “Had [I not come] to Norway, I probably would have not done even anything with these ideas,” says Farouk al-Kasim. Al-Kasim, who is in his mid-seventies now, moved to the town with his Norwegian wife and family in the late 1960s from Iraq where he worked as a geologist for the state oil company.

Al-Kasim quickly found work just as one of the world’s largest oilfields was discovered off the coast of Norway. The government saw his background and hired him to help devise a strategy for managing the resource and the revenue. Al-Kasim says one of the first things Norway did right was to control its new found wealth.

“You don’t really benefit at all by allowing oil revenue to come onto you like a tsunami and flood everything that will completely destroy non-oil sectors of the economy,” he says. That’s what happened in the Netherlands in the 1970s. As oil exports boomed, the flood of money into the domestic economy inflated the currency, leading to price increases. The increases destroyed exports and led to joblessness and inequality.

By contrast, Norway has held on to almost all of the revenue it earns in a giant and ever-growing savings account, known as the “oil fund.” It now holds almost $600 billion and is one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world.

Petter Osmundsen, professor of petroleum economics at the University of Stavanger, says the small amount the government withdraws for spending each year — four percent — is more than enough. “We have been spending a lot of money so even this four percent is a very good increase in public budgets over the last years with good oil price and high oil production,” he says. “We are not starving.”

And the sovereign fund isn’t allowed to invest in Norway. That helps avoid inflation and makes non-oil companies more competitive globally.

But there are challenges. Osmundsen says the global financial crisis has made Norway almost too successful compared to its neighbors.

“We are having good times whereas the others are having bad times,” Osmundsen says. “So we keep getting pay rises whereas the other countries are getting pay cuts. If this lasts for a number of years the Norwegian competitiveness will be reduced in other industries than oil.” So earlier this month, Norway decided to cut its spending from oil income by a billion dollars to slow economic growth.

None of this seems to bother Norwegians, even though the fund holds more than one $100,000 for each citizen. They seem content to save for the future and continue to pay high taxes. Al-Kasim isn’t surprised by their attitude. He believes one of the reasons the Norwegian approach has worked is something he noticed when he first arrived more than 40 years ago.

Al-Kasim believes it was a legacy of the Second World War when Norwegians lived under Nazi occupation. “This sense of belonging together, being completely not only dependent on each other, but trusting each other, this solidarity in the nation was absolutely unique,” he says.

Across town from the simple structure that houses the canning museum, Stavanger’s oil museum is a much more modern, sleek building right on the waterfront. The almost spooky echo of a simulated depth sounder is one of the exhibits, along with scale models of drilling platforms meant to give an impression of what it’s like to drill for oil under the sea. But there’s also a digital clock showing the oil revenue climbing second by second. Another wing houses a gourmet restaurant with gourmet prices. Oil has been good to the town – it’s now one of the most expensive cities in the world. And to Norway.

Discussion

5 comments for “Norway’s Example of Oil and Gas Boom Done Right”

  • Lawashington

    Wonderful example! In US, when the budget was balanced with some extra money in the coffer, Instead of saving for raining days, a tax cut was proposed and welcomed. Now, same people want to cut budget because they do not want to leave the debt to our grandchildren. Why didn’t they think of their grandchildren when they enthusiastically receive the tax cut? Expire the Bush tax cut! The high incomers can afford that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000153681329 David Czuba

    Paul Ekins wrote in “The Gaia Atlas of Green Economics” (1992) about Norway’s fund, but this article makes mention of why Norway did it: because of values. Organizational theorist Geert Hofstede studied cultural values in the 1970s and found major differences between cultures in several dimensions. Two of those dimensions Norway scores high on: Individualism versus Collectivism, and Uncertainty Avoidance. These basically mean that Norwegians stick together, and they don’t like risk. Living in Bellingham, Washington State, with a large Norwegian heritage, it’s easy to see that. We, too, had a thriving cannery industry built mostly on Pacific salmon. So, Norway’s values make it one of the most sustainable countries in the world.

  • vejleanny

     The attitude of “enough” is not unique to Norway.  It is also found in Denmark – without the oil wealth to back it up -  but simply because the Danes know that paying adequate taxes will provide education and a good living for everyone today and in the future.

  • JudeBC

    In 1971, I visited Stavanger, the hometown of my Norwegian friend from Mc Gill University on our graduation.  I fell in love with Norway and the Norwegian people…very warm, kind and hospitable.  Your photo of early Stavanger brought back so many memories for me and I can’t imagine that it is now the most expensive city in the world!
    I wonder why we in Canada have not benefited individually and collectively  from our oil wealth, to the same extent.  We are faced with cutbacks in crucial  services like heath care, pensions, wages, unemployment insurance  benefits, elimination of vital coastguard services …all required to pay off the deficit.
    I think Norway must have maintained all rights to its assets while the oil provinces Alberta, Saskatchewan, and recently Nova Scotia and New Foundland may have sold its assets to foreign oil companies or negotiated agreements which failed to consider the long term needs of the entire country  as opposed to those living in its province.

    • Brendan Ward

      Hey Jude (sorry I couldn’t resist it),  Just to say that if we are looking at the same photo of the harbour, don’t be mis-led.  It’s not early Stavanger, it still looks like that now – and I guess that’s part of the story.  There has been no rush to knock everything down and put up modern office blocks.