German Jews and Muslims Decry Circumcision Ruling

In Berlin's largely Turkish Kreuzberg neighborhood, a Muslim mother holds her six-month-old son. She plans to have him circumcised despite a court ruling that declares the procedure illegal for non-medical, religious purposes. (Photo: David Levitz)

In Berlin's largely Turkish Kreuzberg neighborhood, a Muslim mother holds her six-month-old son. She plans to have him circumcised despite a court ruling that declares the procedure illegal for non-medical, religious purposes. (Photo: David Levitz)

Over the past 250 years, Berlin’s Jewish Hospital has seen a lot, but Dr. Richard Stern never thought he’d see what’s happening now.

“We’ve already had to cancel four or five planned circumcisions,” he says. “The parents are disappointed. Some of them have no idea where to turn.”

Across Germany, doctors are refusing to perform circumcisions on young boys, except in cases of medical necessity. Doctors say they’re afraid of prosecution.

Late last month, a German court ruled that the circumcision of a four-year-old Muslim boy was illegal; it amounted to grievous bodily harm.

The court said that circumcision violated the boy’s constitutional right to bodily integrity and that it was the child’s right to decide, once he reaches adulthood, whether he wants to have his body irreversibly changed.

The ruling has outraged Germany’s Jewish and Muslim minorities. Circumcision of young boys is integral to both religious traditions.

“For Jews, circumcision is a Biblical commandment, and it’s supposed to be done on the eighth day,” says Dr. Stern. “We’re also talking about an ancient tradition that goes back over three thousand years.”

Germany has been plunged into a heated debate for three weeks now. After the court ruling, the country’s foreign minister immediately sided with Jews and Muslims in demanding that the practice of circumcision be protected, but the rest of the government remained silent. One poll showed the majority of Germans agreed with the judges that circumcision should be outlawed.

Late last week the discussion reached a boiling point when an emergency summit of European Orthodox rabbis declared the court’s decision “the worst attack on Jewish life in Germany since the Holocaust.”

The next day, the German government broke its silence.

“We want Muslim and we want Jewish religious life in Germany,” said government spokesman Steffen Seibert. “Responsibly performed circumcisions must be possible in this country, free from prosecution.”

But the legal situation remains confusing.

The court ruling last month only affects one jurisdiction directly, but experts say there’s no telling how much that one decision could influence other courts across Germany.

All major political parties are now calling for a law that expressly protects circumcision, but Parliament doesn’t get back from summer break until September, so the confusion will continue for some time.

At a Turkish market in Berlin, one Muslim mother who didn’t give her name tells me she and other families won’t wait for Parliament to act. She says, if parents have to, they will get their sons circumcised abroad.

“We weren’t sure at first whether we’d get it done here or in Turkey, but now it looks like it’s going to be Turkey,” she says. “Turkey does have doctors too, and at least they’ll let us say prayers.”

German Jews may have the option of relying on traditional circumcisers, known as mohels, but there are only a few in Germany.

Even if the government does pass a law to protect circumcision, legal experts say crafting legislation will be tricky.

“In the end, we’re talking about a collision between two fundamental constitutional rights,” says Hans Michael Heinig, a law professor at the University of Göttingen. “On the one hand, [there’s] the right of parents to give their children a religious upbringing, and on the other hand the right to bodily integrity, which is also quite important.”

These competing rights were written into Germany’s constitution after World War II in response to Nazi atrocities. They were intended to protect vulnerable populations.

Today, Germany’s Jewish population is small – around 100,000 – but the country has 4 million Muslims. One side effect of the court’s ruling has been to foster solidarity between Germany’s Jewish, Muslim, and Christian religious leaders, all of whom have come out against the decision.

Their concerns have been echoed by denouncements from the Turkish government and the Israeli Parliament.

Since the Holocaust, Germany has worked hard to build a reputation for religious tolerance. Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that the court ruling against circumcision threatens that reputation.

Discussion

7 comments for “German Jews and Muslims Decry Circumcision Ruling”

  • I-Kuan Lin

    Is the world coming to the end now because of circumcision?
    This is quintessential nonsense.

  • Yaseminiko

    It might be a tad exaggerated to say that it’s the worst thing that has happened since the Holocaust but it’s definitively an insult and will make Jewish life difficult in Germany. Jewish people have endured so much and shouldn’t have to change traditions that are thousands of years old, neither should Muslims.

  • Carla Slominski

    A parent can give their child a religious upbringing without irrevocably altering that child’s body. Why not leave the choice to the man the child becomes? We protect young girls from genital cutting; boys deserve the same protection. Genital cutting of both boys and girls is usually a deep cultural tradition. That doesn’t negate that it remains a human rights violation.

  • minorityview

    Last month a German court in Cologne ruled that circumcising young boys represents grievous “bodily harm.” Ronald Goldman, Ph.D., executive director of the Jewish Circumcision Resource Center, a nonprofit educational organization, notes that most of the subsequent discussion has been about “religious rights” and “parental rights” and suggests that we take a closer look at circumcision harm to the child. Dr. Goldman is the author of Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective and Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma. His books are endorsed by rabbis and dozens of professionals in mental health, medicine, and social science, and he has participated in over 200 media interviews with radio and television shows, newspapers, wire services, and periodicals.
    According to Dr. Goldman, “Studies show that circumcision causes significant pain and trauma, behavioral and neurological changes in infants, potential parental stress from persistent crying of infants, disrupted bonding between parent and child, and risk of surgical complications. Sometimes infants do not cry because they are in traumatic shock. Other consequences of circumcision include loss of a natural, healthy, functioning body part, reduced sexual pleasure, and unknown negative effects that have not been studied. Don’t believe men who say, ‘I’m circumcised and I’m fine.’ They do not know what they are missing. Emotional repression may also limit their awareness.”
    Dr. Goldman also says that long-term psychological problems connected with circumcision have been documented in clinical reports and surveys of men. “Some circumcised men who understand circumcision resent that they are circumcised. Sexual anxieties, reduced emotional expression, low self-esteem, avoidance of intimacy, and depression are also reported. Some doctors who are aware of the harm (most American doctors are not) refuse to perform circumcisions because of ethical reasons. Relying on presumed authorities is not sufficient because they may have personal, religious, financial, and political conflicts of interest.”
    A growing number of Jews are forgoing circumcision because of their increased awareness of the harm. The Jewish Circumcision Resource Center represents Jews around the world who question circumcision. The Center maintains a confidential list of several hundred names of Jews in the United States, Europe, South America, and Israel who did not circumcise a son.
    The majority of the world does not circumcise because of an instinctive awareness of the harm, analogous to cutting off any other healthy body part. JCRC hopes that the renewed discussion about circumcision includes this perspective and makes children’s interests the priority.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/BTW76TFGSHQORDX6YXAYU3RFNQ Auditi

    Worse human rights violations have occurred over the centuries citing tradition and religion. That does not mean change and wisdom should not change things for the better. Health and human rights should trump the “tradition” of circumcision causing pain and trauma to babies worldwide. Are we still in the dark ages? Let there be light.

  • Nyakairu

    No person or group of people should be allowed to maim babies in the name of religion.

  • Nyakairu

    Every time Jews are rightly criticized, some of them bring up the Holocaust in order to suppress debate. Banning a painful, primitive tradition should not be equated with the Holocaust – which was a crime against humanity.