<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People vs. Apes: Do Social Skills Give Us an Edge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theworld.org/2012/10/people-vs-apes-do-social-skills-give-us-an-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/10/people-vs-apes-do-social-skills-give-us-an-edge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=people-vs-apes-do-social-skills-give-us-an-edge</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives for an American Audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: r2t</title>
		<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/10/people-vs-apes-do-social-skills-give-us-an-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-26120</link>
		<dc:creator>r2t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworld.org/?p=141012#comment-26120</guid>
		<description>To complete the questionable part of the study, they should use a trained chimp and a trained bonobo to show the chimps or the bonobos the two pipes not fitting together.
Then after the animals&#039; reactions are compiled, they would have a more complete data set. Still, some would say they should also use the trained animals to present the problem to the 2-4 yr. old humans. A stronger result would perhaps be a consistent reaction by one or the other of the groups regardless of the species of the presenter. I say perhaps because the presenter is an active participant and must respond to the &quot;trainee&quot; and the non-verbal cues may not be shared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To complete the questionable part of the study, they should use a trained chimp and a trained bonobo to show the chimps or the bonobos the two pipes not fitting together.<br />
Then after the animals&#8217; reactions are compiled, they would have a more complete data set. Still, some would say they should also use the trained animals to present the problem to the 2-4 yr. old humans. A stronger result would perhaps be a consistent reaction by one or the other of the groups regardless of the species of the presenter. I say perhaps because the presenter is an active participant and must respond to the &#8220;trainee&#8221; and the non-verbal cues may not be shared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>