Britain Named Most Prolific Invader

The British defeat at Isandhlwana during the First Zulu War, South Africa, 1879, by Charles Edwin Fripp

The British defeat at Isandhlwana during the First Zulu War, South Africa, 1879, by Charles Edwin Fripp

There have been dozens of US military interventions around the globe since America was founded.

It started even before we were fully independent — with an invasion of what’s now Canada in 1775, and a raid on the Bahamas in 1776.

But when it comes to sending troops to foreign lands, we’ve got nothing on the British.

A new book suggests Britain gets the dubious distinction of having invaded more countries than any other.

It’s called “All the Countries We’ve Ever Invaded: And the Few We Never Got Round To”. It’s by popular historian, Stuart Laycock.

The book claims there are only 22 nations in the world that have never suffered British military attack.

As The World’s resident history buff, I think, however, Britain has invaded even more countries.

Sweden leaps to mind, as an obvious omission. After all, who can forget the Gothenburg expedition of 1808?

That was when British forces were sent to bully the king of Sweden into opposing Britain’s enemy, Napoleon, Emperor of the French.

Then there the possibly of Guatemala. I’m pretty sure that when some British logwood cutters were trying to set the colony which became modern Belize, they raided the coast of Guatemala next door.

Here’s Stuart Laycock’s list of the 22 nations never invaded by Britain:

Andorra
Belarus
Bolivia
Burundi
Central African Republic
Chad
Congo (Republic of)
Guatemala
Ivory Coast
Kyrgyzstan
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Mali
Marshall Islands
Monaco
Mongolia
Paraguay
Sao Tome and Principe
Sweden
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
Vatican City

Read the Transcript
The text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI’s THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI’s THE WORLD is the program audio.

Aaron Schachter: There have been dozen of us interventions around the globe since our nation was founded. It started even before we were fully independent, with an invasion with what is now Canada, in 1775, and a raid on the Bahamas, in 1776, but when it comes to sending troupes to a foreign lands we’ve got nothing on the British. A new book suggests Britain gets the dubious distinction of having invaded more countries than any other. In fact the book claims that there are only 22 nations in the world that have never suffered British military attack, our resident history buff news editor Chris Woolf however thinks Britain has invaded even more countries. Chris what mistake did you spot?

Chris Woolf: Well the one that leaped out at me of course was Sweden cause who could forget the Gottenburg expedition of 1808.

Schachter: Shocking really

Woolf: When we sent a small force to go bully the king of Sweden to help us in the war against Napoleon, the French emperor, and then I was thinking also possibly the book, its a lovely book called, “All the Countries We Ever Invaded and the Few We Never Got Around To” by a British chap called Stuart Laycock; he also lists Guatemala as never having been, well, subject to state sanctioned military activity of a kind-of hostile nature. So for an example like Guatemala I’m pretty sure when British had a few logwood cutters trying to set up a colony in whats now Belize, also raided were the neighboring coastline of Guatemala, so that still leaves 20 countries not invaded.

Schachter: Now we’re using the word invaded but these are not all countries where Britain has gone in, like India, and set up shop.

Woolf: No its pretty much anywhere that the Brits have gone in, or even Brits that have been, in the days of freelance military state sanctioned military types who have gone off and done things in countries where they’re not welcome. You know, for example we licensed privateers, like Frances Drake, to go and singe the king of Spain’s beard wherever Spanish interest could be found… by raiding all places in the Caribbean, and even on the Pacific coast of the South America. And there was a little distance between the crown and these nasty people but they was still pursuing…

Schachter: Not much

Woolf: No, well, of course Frances Drake, when he got back. was knighted by the Queen from his great circumnavigations for all the loot he brought home and shared with Her Majesty.

Schachter: Ok so you fancy yourself as a history buff you’ve wowed us already, how about a test?

Woolf
: OK

Aaron Schachter: Alright one of the 180 countries that Britain has invaded… tell me when were how: Brazil.

Woolf: Brazil that’s a tough one.

Schachter: Ha stumped you

Woolf: Not quite because there was a campaign in 1762 between Spain and Portugal where the British sent some forces to go assist Portugal; Brazil and being a Portuguese colony and the fighting stretched a crossed what’s now Uruguay and southern Brazil.

Schachter: Obviously you can say anything and I would have no idea…

Woolf: Well if, listeners to this; can you can come up with any challenges- it would be great to hear them.

Schachter: How about South Africa?

Woolf: Well South Africa; several attacks when it was occupied by the Dutch. The Brits would try to take it, and finally succeeded in 1796 and then of course it was occupied as a British colony for over a hundred years, and there were several wars against the African people living there and then the white settlers, the Dutch white settlers, the Brits had three wars with the Boers, as they were called.

Schachter: So which country has Britain invaded the most?

Woolf: Well Ireland has probably suffered the longest continuous military occupation over 700 years, it certainly wasn’t welcome present for most of the people there, but the country that suffered the most repeated attacks is of course, France, our nearest continental neighbor and of course that’s probably the source of the traditional animosity between the Brits and the French

Schachter: Chris we are treating this a bit lightly in lieu of the book that came out but this is deadly serious business

Woolf: It is, and of course the Brits have a little pride in the accomplishments of their service personnel much in the same way Americans do and one always likes to think its a virtuous cause, but obviously that’s not always the same memory of the people on the other end have. just last year there was an investigation into the British canton urgency campaign in Kenya in the 1950′s that sadly documented all kinds of atrocities and abuses that sustain on any country so yes of course one shouldn’t take this too lightly.

Schachter: The worlds Chris Woolf, as you can tell from the accent, a member of the British Empire. Thank you

Woolf: You’re welcome.

Copyright ©2012 PRI’s THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI’s THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World’s Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.


Post your fact check challenges to me in the comments below.

Discussion

21 comments for “Britain Named Most Prolific Invader”

  • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

    OK folks, the gauntlet is down. Name a country and let’s see if I can recollect Britain’s military operations there!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=525562770 Neil Jory

      Kazakhstan

      • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

         This is a toughie. Without googling, I suspect there were peripheral operations along the Caspian coast in support of the occupation of Baku and Astrakhan in 1918/1919, as part of the intervention against the Bolsheviks in the old Russian empire.

    • http://www.facebook.com/djem18 David Evans

      Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean – Invasion or legal acquisition (or illegal acquisition)? and when?
      Britain gained Mauritius as a Colony after one of the “Treaty of Paris” events when Napoleon was defeated. 

      But did Britain ever “invade” (I know the term is being used loosely) or else what was the military operation there directly… if any?

      But the real trick is if you know Britain’s military involvement/operations with Chagos….

      • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

         Great question. The only operation I can imagine here was the forcible deportation of the inhabitants of the main island, Diego Garcia, which I recall happening either at the end of the 1950s or early 1960s, to make way for the big airbase leased to the United States.

        • http://www.facebook.com/djem18 David Evans

          Well done! Though they were removed and exiled in the early 1970′s. It is distressing and disturbing how few people in the United States know about the deported and exiled Chagossians, removed for the creation of the US Base on Diego Garcia. It is perplexing that no morally responsible media outlets will cover their story here in the States, though their reasoning is clear. Maybe ‘The World’ would cover it. It is very much a current story and not just “History.”

          This is a moving musical treatment of Chagos history:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgM9jMK-qRM&feature=g-upl

          • jeb_sharp

            Here’s a link to a story we did a while back about the Chagossians:

            http://www.pri.org/theworld/node/26626

            and also a longer interview with anthropologist David Vine about his book Island of Shame.

            http://www.media.theworld.org/pod/history/history15.MP3

          • http://www.facebook.com/djem18 David Evans

            Thank you Jeb for that info and link. I’m very glad to hear you did do a story on Diego Garcia and the Chagossians. I’m only sorry the story doesn’t get heard at a higher profile. I’m sorry the story hasn’t been kept up with by the media here in the States. David Vine lamented that no one knew about it here and three years later, the story is still essentially unknown. NPR did a story on it in 2008, but did not follow up when the Chagossians’ fortunes were quickly reversed by special orders of the British Government. There has been no coverage (of substance) since the islands were declared the World’s Largest Marine Park in 2010. A very odd omission by the US media (Nat Geo may have had a very small blurb). Of course the lack of coverage is because of the Defense situation on Diego Garcia, but as a Nation, we need to have this event in our consciences. Not doing so makes any accusatory finger pointing at other Countries’ Human Rights violations a farce. Of course we should continue to stand for Human Rights around the world as best we can, but there is no excuse that the Chagossians’ plight is not a discussion we are having here. I worked at Diego Garcia in 2004 doing environmental surveys (my facebook/NPR icon photo was taken while working at DG).  http://refractum.blogspot.com/p/galleries.html 

            Now, the Chagossians’ case is coming up before the European Court of Human Rights and should be decided on soon. Will the US media cover it? 

            How can this story approach a level of awareness here in the United States? How can we afford not to have the chance to know about it?

            I’m a marine scientist, but I care about this issue and the Chagossians… and about what this says about us as a country.

            Thanks for your time, I always look forward to “The World” (and sometimes I even get the Geo-quiz).

            ~DJE

  • http://www.facebook.com/djem18 David Evans

    Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean – Invasion or legal acquisition (or illegal acquisition)? and when?

  • http://profiles.google.com/gallafent Alex Gallafent

    If ever there were a time to invade Monaco, surely this is it. 

    [PRI's The World is not responsible for any suggestions that Great Britain take military action against the Principality of Monaco in order to dig itself out of its fiscal crisis.]

    • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

       Come to think of it, I’m pretty sure Monaco would have been blockaded during the operations against the revolutionary French in that neck of the woods in 1799.  No-one should forget the horrors of the siege of Genoa.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7CTRGFHUITZ7RQIN2GUEX5T2WQ Kim

    Zimbabwe…

    • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

       The British South Africa Company fought successive wars against the country’s main peoples, the Shona and the Ndebele, in the 1890s.

  • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

     Mauritius of course captured from the French in 1810. As the French colony of Ile de Bourbon, Mauritius was a mainstay of French power in the Indian Ocean for over 100 years, and the source of much meddling in the affairs of British India.

  • Brenna Norris

    Is it true that Baronet William Norris had an affair with King Henry VIII’s wife Mary (Bloody Mary)? I am distantly related to him and had heard this.

    • http://twitter.com/CCWoolf Chris Woolf

       I’m stumped on this one.  However, Mary was not known for her beauty, but she was known for her devotion to her catholic faith, so that would reduce the likelihood.

      • GuyFlaneur

        ‘Bloody Mary’ was NOT the wife of Henry VIII.  She was his daughter, Mary I of England. She was the only surviving child born of the ill-fated marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife Catherine of Aragon.

      • GuyFlaneur

        ‘Bloody Mary’ was NOT the wife of Henry VIII.  She was his daughter, Mary I of England. She was the only surviving child born of the ill-fated marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife Catherine of Aragon.

      • GuyFlaneur

        ‘Bloody Mary’ was NOT the wife of Henry VIII.  She was his daughter, Mary I of England. She was the only surviving child born of the ill-fated marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife Catherine of Aragon.

    • GuyFlaneur

      ‘Bloody Mary’ was NOT the wife of Henry VIII.  She was his daughter, Mary I of England. She was the only surviving child born of the ill-fated marriage of Henry VIII and his first wife Catherine of Aragon.

  • Julia Czerwinski

    so do you think maybe that honduras was invaded?