<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Egypt to Ban Internet Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theworld.org/2012/11/egypt-internet-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/11/egypt-internet-porn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=egypt-internet-porn</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives for an American Audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisMike2856</title>
		<link>http://www.theworld.org/2012/11/egypt-internet-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-26417</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisMike2856</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworld.org/?p=146174#comment-26417</guid>
		<description>Banning Pornography is not just something for religious conservatives. It is good common sense. Granted it can never be totally screened out, but a policy against it will definitely reduce it drastically. Also it will let those using it at least feel that they are doing something wrong. Without any policy against it, it begins to actually appear as an acceptable practice.

Let&#039;s not kid ourselves. Pornography treats women as sex objects and only leads to the break down of the family, which only leads to so many other social ills that wreak havoc in society. A boy, a man are destroying their capacity to be a good loyal husband and father the more they view pornography.

Is free speech the ultimate goal of society at the expense of all reasonable limtis ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banning Pornography is not just something for religious conservatives. It is good common sense. Granted it can never be totally screened out, but a policy against it will definitely reduce it drastically. Also it will let those using it at least feel that they are doing something wrong. Without any policy against it, it begins to actually appear as an acceptable practice.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not kid ourselves. Pornography treats women as sex objects and only leads to the break down of the family, which only leads to so many other social ills that wreak havoc in society. A boy, a man are destroying their capacity to be a good loyal husband and father the more they view pornography.</p>
<p>Is free speech the ultimate goal of society at the expense of all reasonable limtis ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>