Guatemalan Peasants Sue Canadian Mining Company Hudbay

Rosa Elbira (Photo: chocversushudbay.com)

Rosa Elbira (Photo: chocversushudbay.com)

A small group of Guatemalans from remote villages has made a long trek to Toronto in search of justice. Five of them are suing a Canadian mining company.

They all claim Hudbay Minerals is liable for violence that left one man dead, another in a wheelchair and a group of women victims of gang rapes.

The company denies it is to blame.

After traveling for two days from their tiny villages, four Guatemalan women and one man arrived this week in Toronto. Their sandals suggested they were not prepared to face Toronto’s subzero temperatures.

But Angelica Choc said she’s ready to face those she blames for the death of her husband.

“When the plane landed I had a very sad feeling remembering him,” she said, “but I am here to find justice.”

Adolfo Ich was shot to death in 2009. He was a community leader fighting efforts to evict villagers from their land. Through tears, Choc recalls the moment her son broke the news.

“Mama,” she remembered him saying as he knelt before her. “They’ve killed my father.”

In court documents, Choc and the others claim security officers employed by Hudbay’s Guatemalan subsidiary are responsible for the violence. But they claim Hudbay is liable because it knew the officers weren’t licensed, were poorly trained and carried illegal weapons.

The company denies that and says it respects and protects human rights.

At San Lorenzo church in north Toronto, the mainly Latino congregation’s songs of praise carry a distinctive rhythm. Today, the worshipers are welcoming the Guatemalans who have come to share their stories.

Rosa Elbira slumped in her chair, choking back tears as she recounted the day in 2007 when she said she was repeatedly raped by nine men. Among them, she claimed, were police, soldiers and security officers for a mining company. Beside her, holding her hand in support, sat 23-year-old German Chub Choc.

He’s paralyzed from the waist down, a bullet still lodged near his spine. He admitted to moments despair since the day in 2009 when he said he was shot by the head of the mining company’s security detail.

“Look at me,” he said, pointing to his wheelchair. “Look at what I’ve become.”

HudBay argues the claims won’t hold up in a Canadian court. But its lawyers are trying to stop the case from even getting that far, arguing any case should be tried in Guatemala.

But the lawyer for the Guatemalans, Murray Klippenstein, said that’s unrealistic.

“Many organizations note the Guatemalan legal system is basically corrupt, it’s open to the intimidation and threatening of witnesses – you basically can’t get justice in Guatemala,” Klippenstein said.

Audrey Macklin, a professor at the University of Toronto law school, said the Guatemalans are facing significant but not insurmountable hurdles.

“Canadian judges have traditionally been reluctant to hear these kinds of cases, even when the plaintiffs argue that the justice system in their own nations are corrupt or ineffective,” she said.

American courts have also faced many cases involving multinational companies operating abroad. They’ve been more willing to let the plaintiffs be heard.

Retired Supreme Court of Canada justice Ian Binnie isn’t familiar with this case. But he said the time may be coming to rethink the issue in Canada.

“Eventually, the courts are going to have to face up to the fact that in any responsible legal system people have a right to a day in court. And if the only court available is in Canada then that’s where the problem should be faced,” Binnie said.

Taking comfort among those supporting them at the church, the Guatemalans know they’ve got a long hard fight ahead of them.

But they insist their only route to justice for what they claim happened in their villages – is through a Canadian courtroom.

Discussion

4 comments for “Guatemalan Peasants Sue Canadian Mining Company Hudbay”

  • mijanko

    At first I thought the Guatemalans and supporting groups, some of which are Canadian had their hearts in the right places, but to my horror, I now realize they are using the victim scenario to get money. (Probably the Guatemalans are unaware and being used.)

    Truth is, Hudbay did not even own the Guatemalan company back in 2007 when some of the crimes occurred and they did not employ the man who killed Ich. Hudbay also does not own the company now. Why chase after Hudbay? 

    What we have is a group of people who are using the victim scenario and collectivism to try to get money. They must see Hudbay as a big, fat turkey drumstick, ripe for the eating and they are admittedly hungry. Guatemala is unfortunately a very poor country and these crimes were allegedly perpetrated by Guatemalans to Guatemalans. A Canadian company in what they admit is a corrupt country is too easy a target as they and its people care.

    If these terrible things happened to these seemingly nice people, my heart goes out to them. But truly I tell you, Hudbay is not to blame.

  • Ms, Biz

    Canadian courts have no history of being overly willing to hear these types of international complaints, but this time it was put on the docket. It would seem there is a valid enough argument and sufficient evidence for the courts to entertain the allegations. I sincerely hope Angelica sees justice done and I also hope the judgement (if in her favour) acts as some impetus for First-World corporations and nations to be more vigilant in the protection from exploitation, and more nurturing of their Third-World work forces.

  • Upupuepops

     It is my observation from travelling in third world countries that Canadian mining companies (and oil companies) operate with a cleaner than clean image here at home for our consumption, but such is not the case in developing countries.  There are no laws that restrict their behaviour once they are outside of Canada, but our government doesn’t mind orchestrating free trade agreements in order to facilitate their easy access to third world countries.  I have seen this kind of despicable mode of operation time and time again and it makes me embarrassed to be a Canadian.

  • investright

    A very wise man once told me that “What you put up with, you condone.”  I find it doubtful that Hudbay was unaware of the conflict in the region. They entered Guatamala mining knowing full well of the corruption and abuse. It is pretty obvious that greed outweighs common sense. I think they knowingly bought into a situation that they believed they could control legally or otherwise. I owned shares in Hudbay when first news of the abuse story broke,and sold them without concern for loss or gain. When common people refuse to own stocks in Canadian companies who are in anyway involved in human rights violations things will be forced to change. Investors do control the purse strings of such companies, and there are certainly many international operations to invest in that have the social conscience to avoid developing in such areas and becoming involved in exsisting conflict.  Countries who want development, but abuse their people would certainly clean up their act if none of these companies would operate within their borders until they prove safe and humane conditions. This is a story of human greed and as usual the common person will pay the price because they lack the resources to do otherwise.