Part III: An Ounce of Prevention

A medical team at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India, poses with a woman who has just tested negative for cervical cancer, and her son who brought her in for screening. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

A medical team at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India, poses with a woman who has just tested negative for cervical cancer, and her son who brought her in for screening. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

This story is part of a special series, Cancer’s New Battleground — the Developing World.

Cervical cancer used to kill more women in the United States than any other cancer. Today, deaths in the US are almost unheard of thanks to a decades-old test called a Pap smear, which allows for early detection and treatment.

In India, however, tens of thousands of women still die each year from cervical cancer.

“It’s just not possible for us to provide [the Pap test] as frequently as it is done in the West,” says Dr. Surendra Shastri, a cancer specialist at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai.

The Pap test requires trained personnel and well-equipped labs, which many parts of India do not have.

“So what do we do?” Shastri asks. “We can’t let the women die.”

It turns out there may be a simple answer. It’s a cheap and easy test developed by scientists at Johns Hopkins University and other institutions. And it relies on something you probably have in your kitchen.

Acid Test

I came to the village of Dervan in the Indian state of Maharashtra to see how the test works.

Doctors had set up a temporary clinic in the shell of an empty store. A sheet hung from the ceiling to provide some privacy. There was no electricity—not even a light bulb—in the storefront.

About a dozen Muslim women in headscarves had come for the test. One was on the exam table, her long brown skirt pushed aside. With her friends sitting nearby, she looked calm and ready.

Dr. Surendra Shastri. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

Dr. Surendra Shastri, cancer specialist at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

Dr. Archana Saunke took a cotton swab and applied a clear liquid to the woman’s cervix.

“We wait for one minute, and we see if there is any patch—yellowish patch,” she explained.

If the liquid makes the normally pink cervix turn white or yellow, that means there are precancerous cells—cells that could become cancer.

Within a minute or two, the doctor had some good news for her patient.

“It’s normal,” Saunke said. The woman smiled broadly.

When tests yield bad news and show precancerous cells, those can be removed on the spot with a squirt of liquid nitrogen. No return trip is needed.

So what is this clear liquid Dr. Saunke applied?

“Acetic acid,” she says. Common household vinegar.

Overcoming Resistance

The tests being done here are part of a trial program being run by Tata Memorial Hospital and Walawalkar Hospital, where Dr. Suvarna Patil is medical director.

Patil says when the vinegar test was first brought to the villages, women were not interested, even though it was free.

“Whenever we used to go to their houses, they used to shut the doors. They would say, ‘No, we don’t want [it]. You go away.’”

Patil says many women found testing a bother. They were embarrassed to have a vaginal exam, and for what? They didn’t think cancer could be treated.

India being a country of high- and low-tech solutions, Patil sent out health workers with computers loaded with PowerPoint presentations. They put up posters around town and performed plays. They talked to students in schools and to village leaders.

Still, Patil says, the women wouldn’t come.

“Muslim ladies, they will never come because it’s their culture,” she says. “Even Indian ladies, they are very shy. So first what we did is we appointed [an] all-female staff.”

Dr. Suvarna Patil. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

Dr. Suvarna Patil, medical director at Walawalkar Hospital. (Photo: Joanne Silberner)

The staff got awareness training. They were taught to test not just for cervical cancer, but also for high blood pressure, dental problems, diabetes, and other diseases women were worried about. Men were also invited for those other screenings—and male support for the program was a key factor for the women.

All that got women in the door. Then it was a matter of time for attitudes to change.

Positive Results

Patil says it made a big difference when women saw other women actually beat cancer.

“Now they are seeing the results, because if the cancer is picked up in early condition, the patient is doing well,” she says. “People are coming to us and telling us, ‘Please arrange a cancer screening camp for our ladies.’ But it took eight years. It was so difficult.”

It is evident that those eight years have paid off.

Back at the temporary testing clinic, Sojata Sanjay Kapril said she was happy she underwent the screening. Her test result was negative, but she said if an abnormality had been found, “then we can cure it.”

The vinegar technique has been adopted in several countries now, and there’s another more expensive test for cervical cancer that some say may eventually prove to be even better.

These tests could save the lives of tens of thousands of women in India each year—as long as women continue to be convinced to use them.

(Graphic: Kim Ducharme)

Click on the image to view large version. (Graphic: Kim Ducharme)

This story was reported with assistance from Mahesh Savale. The series was produced with support from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.


Special Series
Cancer’s New Battleground — the Developing World



Health Reporter Joanne SilbernerJoanne Silberner is a freelance reporter and artist-in-residence at the University of Washington in Seattle. For 18 years, she covered health issues for NPR. Silberner has an undergraduate degree in biology from Johns Hopkins University and a master’s degree in journalism from Columbia University. She spent a year on a fellowship at the Harvard School of Public Health, and has also had fellowships from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Carter Center.






Discussion

5 comments for “Part III: An Ounce of Prevention”

  • grisberg2000

    I listened to the full report on the acetic acid test used for cervical cancer screening in India, but I could not get over the initial comment that deaths from cervical cancer were “near zero” in the US. Around 4,000 women die annually from cervical cancer in the US. Around 11 per day, one every few hours. Acetic acid is used in the US for screening as well, and last time I checked to tell someone that one treatment takes care of the problem for life is not accurate either.This report was full of the type of inaccurate information that is rampant about cervical cancer.

    • joanne silberner

      As the author of “near zero,” I take your point — 4,000 is not, on its own, near zero. And my characterization seems insensitive. I was trying to make the point that screening saves many many lives. Cervical cancer rates have gone done dramatically since the introduction of the Pap smear – cervical cancer used to be the number one cause of cancer death among women, it’s now about 14th. In retrospect, I should have just left it at that — that rates have gone down dramatically. As for your second point, that one check is enough – one check will, at least theoretically, get precancerous changes that have occurred, but of course there is a false-negative rate and some growths will be missed. And new cancers could grow after the test. In the U.S., testing is customarily repeated over time. For financial reasons, developing countries are wrestling with the issue of when and how often to test.–Joanne Silberner

      • grisberg2000

        Thank you so much for your prompt reply, Joanne. I really appreciate it. I also understand that you were reporting on a test that can give health care professionals immediate visualization of precancerous lesions which can be treated on the spot. Certainly this will save many lives. You reported on a really effective screening and treatment tool in areas where getting women to show up for a Pap is difficult, or the expense of running the cytology is prohibitive. Again, your focus on developing countries was really clear and thanks for your work. I wonder if you would be interested, for a future piece, in the new guidelines which are increasing the time intervals between screening and the age of screening in developed countries (namely Pap smears in the U.S and U.K., probably elsewhere too). The 70% reduction in cervical cancer deaths in the US is the result of 50 years of early detection and screening. Sadly, the deaths continue and new guidelines which appear to significantly roll back the screening seems risky. AGOG disagrees and thinks there will be little additional risk, but I worry. Finally, and thank your for your patience, part of the reason that deaths from cervical cancers are “unheard of”, is so many women, even in this modern century, in this modern world that I live in, are afraid to speak up. Thank you for bringing the issue of cervical cancer, in general, into the public eye and for replying to my post.

        • http://www.facebook.com/joanne.silberner Joanne Silberner

          Thank you too for the helpful information. I’d love to keep up-to-date with the status of the new guidelines, and if you want to message me via facebook that would be great. One thing that fascinates me is the geographical disparity in cervical cancer deaths in this country. Looking at an incidence map in the US http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/state.htm it looks like there’s a belt across the south. I wonder what that is about. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/mohammed.lardi Mohammed Lardi

    we  at UNFPA support early detection of cervical cancer in moroco using visual inspection  , we can share our experience if some one is intersted
    Dr Mohammed  Lardi   represetative Assistant health  UNFPA