William Troop

William Troop

William Troop is show editor for The World.

  • |
  • ALL POSTS

Will Uruguay Gay Marriage Law Change the Rules on Baby Names in Latin America?

“I love you, but my last name goes first.”

(Photo: George Eastman House/Flickr)

Uruguay made news recently when the lower house of its Congress passed a bill called the Marriage Equality Law. The legislation would allow same-sex marriages, and make all marriages equal under the law regardless of the gender of the two people involved.

The bill is expected to gain approval in Uruguay’s Senate as well, and President Jose Mujica says he’s planning to sign it into law. That would make Uruguay only the second Latin American country to officially make gay marriages legal under national law, after Argentina.

That’s a historic change in the making. But there’s another historic change included in that Uruguayan bill, one that hasn’t generated as much attention.

The proposed law would also alter the rules on how babies are named in Uruguay.

Currently, the law in Uruguay says a baby must have two last names, the first from the father’s side of the family and the second from the mother’s. Period, no room for discussion. It’s the way it’s done, by law, in much of Latin America.

The new rules in Uruguay still call for two last names, but would allow couples to change the order of the names. Mother’s could come first, followed by father’s. In the case of a same-sex couple, the partners can choose which last name to use first.

The change seems to be a very straightforward way to truly make all marriages equal, as the bill’s authors intended.

Things get less straightforward if the new parents disagree on the order. If a heterosexual couple can’t agree on which name to list first, it’s back to father’s followed by mother’s. If a gay couple can’t agree on the order, it’s literally down to the luck of the draw.

The proposed naming changes in Uruguay would, of course, only apply to Uruguay. But I have a feeling that they could also open the way for similar changes elsewhere in Latin America.

The “two last names” tradition comes from Spain, where it developed over centuries. The conquistadors spread it to Spain’s many far-flung colonies. And the tradition became law in Spain and other Spanish-speaking places in the 19th century.

But guess what? Spain changed its baby-naming laws back in 1999, allowing mother’s name to come first if both mother and father agree. Seems like lawmakers in Uruguay are just catching up with the old motherland!

Still, the “two last names” convention in Spanish-speaking Latin America is more than just law. It’s engrained in the region’s character. Always the two last names, and always father’s followed by mother’s. It gives each newborn baby a unique identity (most of the time, anyway) and it highlights both sides of the family tree for at least one generation.

The two last names thing is hard for outsiders to digest, though. To many non-Latino Americans, it can seem overly complicated. When they encounter a person with two last names, they never know which to use on second reference. And when should a double last name be hyphenated? Answer: it depends. But that’s for another blog post.

Also, some of Latin America’s children who, officially, have two last names don’t use them both in daily life. I’m one of them.

I was born in Mexico and my birth certificate lists my two last names, father’s followed by mother’s. But living and working in the English-speaking world, I only use my father’s last name. It’s simpler.

Although I did make an exception when I graduated from college. I had both last names put on my diploma as a tribute to my mother, who paid the tuition bills. Thanks Mom!


Discussion

6 comments for “Will Uruguay Gay Marriage Law Change the Rules on Baby Names in Latin America?”

  • hyhybt

    I guess this is as good a place to ask as any… how does this work, multigenerationally? What I mean is, if every generation, the baby gets the last name of both its father and its mother, how do you not wind up with a four-word last name the next generation, and then eight, etc.?

    • http://twitter.com/wmtroop William Troop

      Good question! It’s usually restricted to the first last name listed by the father, followed by the first last name listed by the mother.  Although in some cases, people try to preserve a cherished maternal last name by a hyphenating it onto a paternal name.

      • hyhybt

        Thanks. I suspected it would be something like that, but better to ask than to assume.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stanley-James/503792594 Stanley James

         my daugher never changed her last name, and her daughter has a hyphenated last name   – mother first, then Dad who happens to be Asian by birth.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Israel-Navas-Duran/100001788156762 Israel Navas Duran

    If I’m not wrong in Brazil (and Portugal) is the other way around, which turns out to be the ancestral way of both. I’m all for this other system of assigning surnames

    “both men and women should keep their premarital surnames for life, with sons taking their fathers’ surnames and daughters their mothers’.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_vos_Savant#Biography

    that in addition makes more sense from a genetic point of view since biological mothers transmit their mitochondrial DNA to their daughters (and their sons), and the daughters of their daughters (but not to the offspring of their sons), and so on along their matrilineal descendance, whereas biological fathers transmit their Y chromosome to their sons (but not their daughters), the sons of their sons and so on through the patrilineal descendants.

    Such system would be very useful to discover distant relatives, what could help evaluate the genetic predisposition to certain diseases or conditions, identify the alleles that contribute the most to those predispositions, etc.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stanley-James/503792594 Stanley James

    I’m sure that there is a good will solution to the situation  – let the couple decide which name comes firts

    But there is another benefit to doing the marriage bill for which will allow str8 couples to choose the name order

    Note that the fathers name now comes first.  Why – because it places the father over the mother in order of respect etc.  the history of htis goes way back to when women were property.

    And the catholic church still believes in this idea – thats why it   doesnt allow women as  religious leaders, who are seen as the channel  to God  / Heaven

    Not only does the church discriminate against gay people but it does the same re women.  Nuns and Sisters are basically cheap labor for the churh,.   Its segregation and less then equal religious citizenship.