Alex Gallafent

Alex Gallafent

Alex Gallafent is the New York-based correspondent for The World. His reporting has taken him to Swaziland, Turkey, Chile, and India, among other places.

  • |
  • ALL POSTS

Delhi Rape Provokes Discussion Among Indian-born Women in the US

Aswini Anburajan. (Photo: Alex Gallafent)

Aswini Anburajan. (Photo: Alex Gallafent)

The horrific attack on the young woman and her companion in Delhi was the kind of news you couldn’t avoid talking about: it was simply too big for that, said Aswini Anburajan.

“It naturally arose, I think, in a lot of families,” she said, “and we were all just home for the holidays.”

In conversations with her family, Anburajan brought up an aspect of the story she’d found infuriating: comments from Indian lawmakers about the young rape victim. The comments reinforced her view of India as a thoroughbred patriarchy.

“Like, ‘why is she out at 10pm at night?’, ‘girls have to cover up more’, ‘the women are just party girls’. It really tied into something that I have been hearing my whole life.”

Anburajan moved to the US from India when she was four, but she says her parents carried with them a sensibility that women shouldn’t be free, sexually or even economically.

She recently wrote an opinion piece about the subject for the site Buzzfeed, where she works as the director of partner development.

“There’s an issue of gender equality,” she said, “and it’s subtle. It’s not about they don’t have the right to vote, or they have to cover up in public. It’s societal and it’s ingrained.”

Even among the men in her own family, Anburajan said, there was a sense that sexual violence simply happens and that women need to be better protected, by men.

“That’s what it comes down to, right? They need to be ‘in their proper place’, they need to be ‘protected’, and, when the time is right, that protection goes from the parents to the husband.”

To get a sense of whether Anbujaran’s view is a common one among Indian-Americans (or Indians currently living in the United States), I went to Jackson Heights. It’s a South Asian neighborhood in Queens, New York.

I stopped to talk with a woman named Kiran who has lived here with her son for more than 20 years. She also thought that India needs to find new ways to think about women, sex and relationships.

“They should give information about sex and everything,” she said.

“But there is some shyness and they can’t talk very freely with their children. It’s different here. Here it is free, everything. Boy[s] and girl[s], they go outside, what[ever] they do, [their parents] don’t care. If you are 16 years [old] you can do whatever you want with your girlfriend. It is not easy in India.”

But Aswini Anburajan countered that it’s not all free and easy here in the US either. She knows of Indian Americans completely unable to level with their parents about how they’re living their lives.

“How ludicrous is it that I know someone who is a psychiatrist who won’t admit to her parents that she’s living with her boyfriend? It’s crazy.”

Still, Anburajan is optimistic. Change in India comes slowly; it’s often chaotic. But, she said, it always comes from the ground up. Women are playing a central part in driving India’s economy forward. Many of them are moving back and forth between India and the US, picking up degrees at American colleges before returning home to find work.

A young Indian woman named Tuhina, walking in Jackson Heights with a friend, said that “in India they respect what is said in the West a lot; the influence is very high.”

Tuhina is a chemical engineer–she just completed her graduate degree in upstate New York. Yes, she said, the Indian government’s next steps are in the international spotlight. But for her the real shift in attitudes will come in a more organic way.

“The way I look at it is the bonds between bonds between sisters and family,” she said. “That’s much more influential than what you see on TV. So if I tell my sister something she’s going to be more influenced by it than [by] a friend who is living in India.”

Tuhina added that things are already different in her own home city, Mumbai.

“The relationship dynamics, it’s changing,” she said, “It’s changing a lot, and I’m very happy about that.”

Mumbai is a global city, more so than Delhi: It already gets a lot of cultural churn from all over the world. Tuhina and many of the other voices now speaking out come from educated, urban backgrounds. The larger challenge for India, then, will be to include all of the country’s women–and men–in whatever changes may be on the way.

Discussion

5 comments for “Delhi Rape Provokes Discussion Among Indian-born Women in the US”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1169990201 Barbara Jensen

    This was anxcellent segment. However, I was appalled that in the following segment both host and guest (a) assume that rape in India is
    suddenly a worse problem now than in decades before and (b) suggest that
    women have brought this situation upon themselves by becoming more
    independent.

    • Kmindopath

       

      Jan 11, 2013

      IN GOD WE TRUST.  IN
      DEVIL WE BELIEVE. 

      That is why even politicians will not change the pro-rape
      and pro-prostitution law to protect even their own
      mothers, daughters, and/or sisters because doing so  will reverse and correct the government-regulated sense
      of right and wrong as conscience of the people. 

      Conscience makes it legal for men to deny paternities of
      babies given back to them as fathers by the women (not their wives) they impregnated.  It makes it illegal for women to deny their
      maternities.  It makes babies instead of
      fathers the bastards.  It is causing the
      resulting royal Baby Bastard Curse (BBC) on the people
      in billions including you and
      me.  

      That is why on Nov 2, 1988, it made
      the Honorable US
      Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist rule
      that if “two policemen see a rape and watch it just for their own
      amusement, no violation of the Constitution [as the pro-rape and pro-prostitution law to
      keep promoting violation of women and prostitution].”  This ruling in his 1989 US Supreme Court new landmark case of DeShaney v Winnebago
      County that is reported at 489 US 189.  It helps to
      sell Governments of the predators, by the predators, for the predators as
      Governments of the people, by the people, for the people.  It insures that Governments shall not perish
      from the earth because when they do, the royal Baby Bastard Curse (BBC) will be lifted and people
      will begin to live good in heaven-on-earth without predators as politicians forced
      to make the change for good. 

      Justice Autopsy is a Devil-Daring
      and God-Fearing True Scripture helping me use
      my self-correcting brain in my self-healing body to understand, recognize,
      reverse, and correct my reversed sense of right and wrong, begin
      the new age to progress forwards, and end congressing backwards.  All brains are just like
      cars stuck in reverse gear going backwards to shift
      easily into forward gear to go forwards. This paradigm shift to correct the incorrect course of
      history (say his story) of evil sold as good is so easy. It’s a miracle.

      (K)mindopath.

  • DebbyBruck

    I discussed the issue of rape with my friends in India.  Rape in Society Today http://ning.it/UAEbY4

    • Kmindopath

       an 11, 2013

      IN GOD WE TRUST.  IN
      DEVIL WE BELIEVE. 

      That is why even politicians will not change the pro-rape
      and pro-prostitution law to protect even their own
      mothers, daughters, and/or sisters because doing so  will reverse and correct the government-regulated sense
      of right and wrong as conscience of the people. 

      Conscience makes it legal for men to deny paternities of
      babies given back to them as fathers by the women (not their wives) they impregnated.  It makes it illegal for women to deny their
      maternities.  It makes babies instead of
      fathers the bastards.  It is causing the
      resulting royal Baby Bastard Curse (BBC) on the people
      in billions including you and
      me.  

      That is why on Nov 2, 1988, it made
      the Honorable US
      Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist rule
      that if “two policemen see a rape and watch it just for their own
      amusement, no violation of the Constitution [as the pro-rape and pro-prostitution law to
      keep promoting violation of women and prostitution].”  This ruling in his 1989 US Supreme Court new landmark case of DeShaney v Winnebago
      County that is reported at 489 US 189.  It helps to
      sell Governments of the predators, by the predators, for the predators as
      Governments of the people, by the people, for the people.  It insures that Governments shall not perish
      from the earth because when they do, the royal Baby Bastard Curse (BBC) will be lifted and people
      will begin to live good in heaven-on-earth without predators as politicians forced
      to make the change for good. 

      Justice Autopsy is a Devil-Daring
      and God-Fearing True Scripture helping me use
      my self-correcting brain in my self-healing body to understand, recognize,
      reverse, and correct my reversed sense of right and wrong, begin
      the new age to progress forwards, and end congressing backwards.  All brains are just like
      cars stuck in reverse gear going backwards to shift
      easily into forward gear to go forwards. This paradigm shift to correct the incorrect course of
      history (say his story) of evil sold as good is so easy. It’s a miracle.

      (K)mindopath.

  • Kmindopath

     

    Jan 09, 2013

    “if two policemen see a rape and watch it just for
    their own amusement, no violation of the Constitution” is a PRO-RAPE LAW
    giving every one in every nation the legal right to rape, even gang rape,
    protected by policemen.  These are the famous judicial words of the now
    deceased Honorable US Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist.  These words, welcomed by judicial laughter in
    the US Supreme Court mocking the famous Lady Justice are from his 1989 landmark
    case of DeShaney v Winnebago County.   It
    is reported in US Supreme Court Reports as 489 US 189.  This is the basic law of the land made by men
    to please the Courts.  It makes lawmen and laymen, the two sides of the
    same human race, see no wrong in committing rapes for illicit sexual
    pleasure.   This predatory law will keep
    re-proving that each and every nation’s Constitution is a PRO-RAPE LAW. 
    It was made by the men, of the men, for the men, in retaliation against the
    women.  Men know that jurists will protect rapists under this PRO-RAPE
    LAW.  Every one talks everything.  No one does anything.  Why? 
    Because the law says: People, Presidents, even
    United Nations, have legal rights to punish those who fail to support
    the law to do wrongs, commit crimes, enjoy rape, even discriminate. It’s the
    law.  But why?  Just because

    IN GOD WE TRUST.  IN DEVIL WE
    BELIEVE.  SO HELP US GOD BELIEVE IN GOD, NOT IN DEVIL.  ENOUGH IS
    ENOUGH.  Thanks.

    (K)mindopath