Jason Margolis

Jason Margolis

Jason Margolis is a Boston-based reporter who regularly files stories throughout the U.S. about politics, economics, immigration issues, and environmental matters.

  • |
  • ALL POSTS

Making the Case for Immigration Reform from Texas

Carlos Duarte with "Mi Familia Vota" spent last year trying to get Latino immigrants engaged in the political process through voting. Now, he and other organizers are concentrating their focus on passing immigration reform. (Photo: Jason Margolis)

Carlos Duarte with "Mi Familia Vota" spent last year trying to get Latino immigrants engaged in the political process through voting. Now, he and other organizers are concentrating their focus on passing immigration reform. (Photo: Jason Margolis)

At his inauguration on Monday, President Obama will surely present a wide-ranging laundry list of topics he’d like to tackle during his second term. He won’t be able to do them all. And that leaves special interest groups busy strategizing how to convince the president to put their issue atop his list.

Immigrant rights advocates want their issue addressed soon – establishing a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living and working in the United States. But standing in their way are many conservative lawmakers who regard this as a free pass, or amnesty, for rule breakers.

Down in Texas, I got to sit in on a meeting of grassroots immigrant rights activists in Houston. The meeting was led by Carlos Duarte with the group Mi Familia Vota, or My Family Votes. Duarte said they need to target four Republican Congressmen in Houston and two Republican US senators from Texas.

“Unless they understand that they will be without a job in the next election, unless they understand that, they are not going to sign an immigration reform that is really useful for the community as a whole,” said Duarte.

The people in the room nodded their heads. They see their time as now.

“The Latino voice has come out, we’ve made an impact, and people have to respond, right?” said Paloma Martinez with the Service Employees International Union. “And I think people will get fired up if we make that really clear, that it’s possible, it’s within reach. We have a vision and we can do it.”

Latinos flexed their muscle last November. Some 12 million voted, and they voted overwhelmingly, upwards of 75 percent, for President Obama. Immigration reform was a top issue for many of those Latino voters, and they rejected Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s focus on border enforcement and “so called” self-deportation.

Carlos Duarte said that Latinos must make politicians who sided with Romney know that they’ll lose their elections too if their position on immigration doesn’t change.

“We need to call members of Congress, we need to participate in rallies, we need to register to vote, and we need to vote. Because unless they understand that we are going to make them accountable through the vote, they are not going to be passing immigration reform.”

Immigrant rights activists in Houston putting together their political strategies. (Photo: Jason Margolis)


But that’s a strategy that’s been used for years now, with little to show in terms of significant progress on immigration reform. This time though, with the Latino vote proving strong, activists hope there’ll be a payoff.

After the meeting, I spoke with César Espinosa, who moved to Texas from Mexico City when he was 4. He’s been living in the US undocumented for the past 23 years and runs an organization called Immigrant Families and Students In The Struggle. Like many immigrant rights organizers, Espinosa himself can’t vote. But he can rally others to vote for his interests.

“We have people power. We can move thousands and thousands of people to rallies to marches and things like that. When you can’t vote, you vote with your feet, you march,” said Espinosa.

Immigrant rights advocates are planning to make their presence felt in Washington in the coming months. Espinosa said they also want politicians to feel their presence in the pocketbook.

“Obviously they have people that donate to them. And we just target everybody, we cast a wide open net,” said Espinosa. “We approach them, and we tell them this is what immigration reform is, this is who we are, we share our stories with them so that they know that we’re not ghosts, that we are actual people who are contributing, who have roots here, who have business interests here.”

But will all this, and the recent momentum, be enough to get immigration reform done? It depends on your timeline, said political scientist Mark Jones at Rice University in Houston.

“In the short-term, there is no real consequence for alienating Hispanics, at least outside of a few marginal swing districts. In the long-term though, the Republican Party’s failure to retain and win a large share of the Hispanic vote will spell doom for the party as a viable national force.”

That could be about 8 to 10 years from now, by Jones’ estimate. But are Republican party leaders willing to think that far ahead? Jones said it’s hard to make the case that the Party is in crisis mode, especially in red-state Texas.

Mark Jones at Rice University in Houston. (Photo: Jason Margolis)

“Because they look to see that they’re winning statewide elections by more than 10 points. They have close to two-thirds of the seats in the (Texas) Senate and State House. They really aren’t worried about the short-term.”

And on the national level, Jones said, “You’d be hard pressed to find more than a half-dozen Republican members of the US House who could possibly lose their seat due to Hispanics voting against them.”

On the flip side, consider the Republican politician who aligns with Democrats on immigration reform. They risk being challenged by a more conservative primary opponent come the mid-term elections.

But some Republicans are taking that risk. For instance, Senator Marco Rubio from Florida recently came forward with proposals that aren’t all that different from President Obama’s plans. Perhaps Rubio is thinking long-term because he has national aspirations. By many accounts, Rubio is interested in a run at the White House.

But immigrant activists I met, like Esther Reyes, executive director of the Austin Immigrant Rights Coalition, said they’re not focused on party lines.

“Our faith is not in any political party. Absolutely we can be used as pawns. Any community can be used as a pawn as far as politically, and for that reason, our strength is not in in a political party’s promises. Our strength is in our community.”

She said look at major social movement in history: No lawmaker just wakes up one day and says something like, you know what, today I’m going to give women the right to vote. Change will be through the groundswell, through constant pressure. The question is: Will immigrant rights activists be able to create enough of it?

Discussion

One comment for “Making the Case for Immigration Reform from Texas”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dave-Francis/100003689645540 Dave Francis

     

    FIRST OUR GUNS, AND MORE TAXES TO BE TAKEN TO
    SUPPORT ILLEGAL ALIENS.

     

    Everybody can have a say in this illegal immigration
    controversy, by calling their federal and state representatives? President
    Obama is determined to give people who have no respect for our laws, a path to citizenship;
    even low key criminals. Zero-in on your politicians and demand they vote for
    passage of Texas Republican Lamar Smith “(The Legal Workforce Act (H.R. 2885)” to
    remove unauthorized workers from nationwide business by implementing mandated
    E-Verify. Both businesses and the American people overwhelmingly support
    E-Verify. Nearly 360,000 American employers voluntarily use E-Verify and over
    2,700 new businesses sign up every week. The program quickly confirms 99.5% of
    work-eligible employees. It’s free, fast, and easy to use. With 23 million
    Americans unemployed or underemployed and seven million illegal immigrants
    working in the U.S., now is the time to increase E-Verify. Then also demand
    passage of the “Birthright Citizenship bill (Rep. Steve King, R-IA; H.R.140)”,
    which will collapse the intentional smuggling of the illegal unborn into the
    United States to collect hundreds of billions of dollars in entitlements from
    taxpayers by parents.

     

    Called “anchor babies,” the children of illegal
    immigrants born in the United States cannot actually prevent deportation of
    their parents. It is not until they attain the age of 21 that the children are
    able to file paperwork to sponsor their parents (CHAIN MIGRATION) for legal
    immigration status. The cost is unparalleled for the U.S. taxpayer who is
    charged with the free education, health care and low income shelter and cash
    payments.  The parents remain exposed
    until that point. A well regulated Guest Labor force could be provided for
    agriculture, but not permanent residency. Plus the STEM program for technical
    professionals who wish to immigrate, but not unlimited numbers. The
    impoverished should not apply, as America has millions of its own under privileged.
     All the facts, the shocking costs to
    federal and mainly states welfare benefits, which the Liberal Progressives
    press, does not wish to be known at NumbersUSA website.

     

    Are we about to lose our rights, our guns and a say
    on illegal immigration?