<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNA Confirms Excavated Bones are King Richard III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theworld.org/2013/02/dna-confirms-excavated-bones-are-king-richard-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theworld.org/2013/02/dna-confirms-excavated-bones-are-king-richard-iii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dna-confirms-excavated-bones-are-king-richard-iii</link>
	<description>Global Perspectives for an American Audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.theworld.org/2013/02/dna-confirms-excavated-bones-are-king-richard-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-27760</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworld.org/?p=159981#comment-27760</guid>
		<description> You are right the Rous/More description does not appear in Richard III, but more about his physique appears in Henry VI. Perhaps you will find this interesting: http://www.google.com.mx/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=9&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CGoQFjAI&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdialnet.unirioja.es%2Fdescarga%2Farticulo%2F1688017.pdf&amp;ei=okwQUa7-Do2A2AWT_4GYBg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFsgng4NgAQWaOz8jterUqcSgZajg&amp;bvm=bv.41867550,d.b2I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You are right the Rous/More description does not appear in Richard III, but more about his physique appears in Henry VI. Perhaps you will find this interesting: <a href="http://www.google.com.mx/url?sa=t&#038;rct=j&#038;q=&#038;esrc=s&#038;source=web&#038;cd=9&#038;sqi=2&#038;ved=0CGoQFjAI&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdialnet.unirioja.es%2Fdescarga%2Farticulo%2F1688017.pdf&#038;ei=okwQUa7-Do2A2AWT_4GYBg&#038;usg=AFQjCNFsgng4NgAQWaOz8jterUqcSgZajg&#038;bvm=bv.41867550,d.b2I" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com.mx/url?sa=t&#038;rct=j&#038;q=&#038;esrc=s&#038;source=web&#038;cd=9&#038;sqi=2&#038;ved=0CGoQFjAI&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdialnet.unirioja.es%2Fdescarga%2Farticulo%2F1688017.pdf&#038;ei=okwQUa7-Do2A2AWT_4GYBg&#038;usg=AFQjCNFsgng4NgAQWaOz8jterUqcSgZajg&#038;bvm=bv.41867550,d.b2I</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis Weiner</title>
		<link>http://www.theworld.org/2013/02/dna-confirms-excavated-bones-are-king-richard-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-27758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworld.org/?p=159981#comment-27758</guid>
		<description>Anne Easter Smith said in the interview that the myth of Richard included the contention that his mother carried him for two years, that he was born with a full head of hair and &quot;a full head of teeth,&quot; and that Shakespeare (&quot;writing for the Tudors&quot;) maintained this fiction in his play.

Not according to the opening soliloquy.  Behold:

But I,--that am not shap&#039;d for sportive tricks,

Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;

I, that am rudely stamp&#039;d, and want love&#039;s majesty

To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;

I, that am curtail&#039;d of this fair proportion,

Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,

Deform&#039;d, unfinish&#039;d, sent before my time

Into this breathing world scarce half made up,

And that so lamely and unfashionable

That dogs bark at me as I halt by them;--

Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,

Have no delight to pass away the time,

Unless to spy my shadow in the sun,

And descant on mine own deformity:
 
&quot;Sent before my time into this breathing world, half made up,&quot; or two years in the making?  Which is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Easter Smith said in the interview that the myth of Richard included the contention that his mother carried him for two years, that he was born with a full head of hair and &#8220;a full head of teeth,&#8221; and that Shakespeare (&#8220;writing for the Tudors&#8221;) maintained this fiction in his play.</p>
<p>Not according to the opening soliloquy.  Behold:</p>
<p>But I,&#8211;that am not shap&#8217;d for sportive tricks,</p>
<p>Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;</p>
<p>I, that am rudely stamp&#8217;d, and want love&#8217;s majesty</p>
<p>To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;</p>
<p>I, that am curtail&#8217;d of this fair proportion,</p>
<p>Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,</p>
<p>Deform&#8217;d, unfinish&#8217;d, sent before my time</p>
<p>Into this breathing world scarce half made up,</p>
<p>And that so lamely and unfashionable</p>
<p>That dogs bark at me as I halt by them;&#8211;</p>
<p>Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,</p>
<p>Have no delight to pass away the time,</p>
<p>Unless to spy my shadow in the sun,</p>
<p>And descant on mine own deformity:<br />
 <br />
&#8220;Sent before my time into this breathing world, half made up,&#8221; or two years in the making?  Which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>